Skip to main content

1-20 of 645 results for subject:Prices

Legislation X
Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill 2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill 2005-06 (645)
More

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

moved Amendment No. 5:"Page 1, line 12, leave out subsection (4)." The noble Lord said: This amendment removes subsection (4) from the Bill which removes the requirement for subsequent revaluation in England on the 10th anniversary of the previous one. It does, however, retain such a provision for billing authorities in Wales, thereby separating...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c312GC
House
House of Lords

I would like to thank the noble Lord for that reply, but I do not feel that I can. He has concentrated on the second part of the amendment, which is to do with divergence, but nowhere in the amendment does it say that that would be the only criteria, and he has...

Member
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c311-2GC
House
House of Lords

I particularly raised the question of Wales, but the noble Lord has not talked about that at all. I notice that today he has not repeated the often-used phrase ““revenue-neutral””. We are absolutely convinced that all the evidence shows that in Wales the system has not been revenue-neutral. I was trying to make...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c314GC
House
House of Lords

The principles behind our approach may well be the same, but I do not think we should see Wales as a precedent for revaluation in England. If I am teasing the noble Lord, it is because what I enjoy most is seeing some consistency in Conservative Party thinking. The reasons for the Government...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c313-4GC
House
House of Lords

The amendment leaves me more confused about the Opposition’s real intentions with regard to revaluation and the need for it or not. As we highlighted in our response to Amendment No. 3, on the one hand we are told that they have changed their mind about their policy and no longer...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c313GC
House
House of Lords

But consultation is taking place and what I call the Miliband review on the future of local government.

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c318GC
House
House of Lords

I do not know whether I thank the Minister for his answer as I do not think he responded to my points fully. I do not usually get involved with many Welsh debates; we have other colleagues who normally do that for us. We were trying to get equal treatment for England and Wales...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c315-6GC
House
House of Lords

I will try to reassure noble Lords opposite. The general point was made by the noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, that there needs to be an opportunity for this House to debate anything that comes forward and follows from any of the current debates—they are generally not reviews. As I said in the House,...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c318GC
House
House of Lords

It is important that I make myself clear. Because of the timetable of revaluation—the way in which dates are set and brought forward—it was important to ensure that it was stopped at the point at which we would not only be saving money but also introducing clarity and certainty into the...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c300-2GC
House
House of Lords

We think it very unlikely that there will be a revaluation in the lifetime of this Parliament. A specific question raised on the back of the amendment was why the Secretary of State has this power. The options for the Secretary of State having this power are limited, if not...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c300GC
House
House of Lords

Much of what I wish to say on my amendment could also be said under this one, but I shall not say it now. I have a great deal of sympathy with the points raised by the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield. Can the Minister explain how it is foreseen that the Valuation Office Agency...

Member
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c296GC
House
House of Lords

In addition to the Sir Michael Lyons review.

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c318GC
House
House of Lords

I had a letter from David Miliband yesterday asking me to be part of the discussions about the future structure of local government.

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c319GC
House
House of Lords

It was an extremely useful exercise for us to work through both the original amendment and this one, so nothing has been lost. It is useful to put on the record the nature of the debate, even though we are constrained by the Short Title.

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c307GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. *3A:"Page 1, line 6, leave out from ““compiled”” to end of line 8 and insert ““on a date previous to the making of any order under section 5(4) and (4A) of this Act.””””" The noble Baroness said: I think that we all accept that this is an important piece of legislation, but...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c303-4GC
House
House of Lords

I recognise the experience that my noble friend brings to this debate and the reality of what he has described. I cannot comment on the possibility of an annual review. It may be one of the options to emerge in the debate. However, it would be a huge burden for the Valuation...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c302GC
House
House of Lords

Large numbers of people are engaged in a debate throughout local government at the moment, not least the Local Government Association.

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c318GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 6:"Page 1, line 17, at end insert—" ““(   )   In subsection (11), for ““the House of Commons”” substitute ““each House””.”” The noble Lord said: Amendment No. 6 would compel the future orders made by the Secretary of State under Section 22B to be subject to affirmative resolution by both Houses of Parliament. As the Bill...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c316GC
House
House of Lords

I do not know whether I am having a dense moment, but I am finding this difficult to understand. It seems that we are in a position where a decision was made that we would have revaluation, and a decision has subsequently been made that we will not have revaluation. Not revaluing would...

Member
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c318GC
House
House of Lords

Could the Minister answer a hypothetical question? The reason for postponing the revaluation is the Sir Michael Lyons interim report, and Sir Michael Lyons has now been charged with coming to other decisions. We know, and it is clear, that there are other reviews relating to local government. So if...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 February 2006
Reference
678 c317-8GC
House
House of Lords