Skip to main content

1-20 of 259 results for subject:Devolution

Legislation X
National Health Service Act 2006

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
National Health Service Act 2006 (259)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Last weekend my hon. Friend the Member for Spen Valley (Kim Leadbeater) posted on X a story of two older people who wanted to die together, and who had found doctors to sign off their assisted death. Is my hon. Friend concerned that this debate might be romanticising suicide pacts...

Member
Jess Asato (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1309
House
House of Commons

I think everyone in the House debates this issue in good faith, and in the courts there is a general view that one should be reluctant to attack otherwise. I am sure that question was meant on that basis. However, one must not lose sight of the fundamental point that...

Member
John Grady (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1309
House
House of Commons

Edmund Burke said:

“Bad laws are the worst sort of tyranny.”

Over time, I have seen many imperfect measures put before the House—under Governments of all persuasions, by the way—and usually, through scrutiny, they are improved. That is because the parliamentary process works when there is time available, and in particular when...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 cc1309-1310
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1310
House
House of Commons

I give way to the hon. Member for North Herefordshire as I cited her.

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1310
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that the right hon. Gentleman has misrepresented what I said. I was contributing an observation from somebody who has been deeply involved in palliative care practice, who reports that it is far more frequent that the dying person wishes to die, while it is their family who...

Member
Ellie Chowns (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1310
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that I disagree. There are numerous cases where people will be encouraged, and perhaps even forced, to take a decision, when they are coping with illness and at their most vulnerable—when they are frightened, doubtful and distressed, and may be unbalanced. Of course we have to protect...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1310
House
House of Commons

On that point, evidence from exit interviews shows that 35% of people choosing an assisted death in Canada and 47% in Oregon listed as their reason for doing so that they felt they were a burden to their family.

Member
Tim Farron (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1310
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman anticipated what I was about to say; I have cited exactly that evidence many times during the debate. We need to look at the experience elsewhere to inform what we do here. We always do that when we pass the right laws in this place.

There is worse...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 cc1310-1
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak to my amendment 27. The insufficiencies of clause 25 and new clause 13, and the mechanisms for substance approval, have attracted much criticism as they defy safe process. I have therefore undertaken extensive research with leading academics, toxicologists, anaesthetists, pharmacists and others to understand the safety...

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 cc1311-2
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Member
Lizzi Collinge (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1312
House
House of Commons

No time.

There is a lack of consistency of approach and data across jurisdictions on the substances used, how they are titrated and the dosages administered. While ingestion can be a factor, absorption varies according to frailty, metabolism, diagnosis, body mass index and drug reactions. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are complex.

However, it...

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1312
House
House of Commons

May I start by offering the condolences of His Majesty’s Opposition to all those affected by the Air India plane crash, including the families of the very many British citizens who, very sadly, lost their lives. Our thoughts are with all of them.

As is well understood now, the Opposition remain...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 cc1312-4
House
House of Commons

I associate the Government with the words of the Opposition spokesman regarding the tragic incident in India.

As Members will know, the Government remain neutral on the passage of the Bill and on the principle of assisted dying. We have always been clear that this is a decision for Parliament. However,...

Member
Stephen Kinnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 cc1314-5
House
House of Commons

One of the key things that the Bill’s sponsor, the hon. Member for Spen Valley (Kim Leadbeater), has said throughout is that four years, in the Bill as it currently is, would be a backstop. Can that be the case if the Minister is talking about a requirement of four...

Member
Tom Gordon (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1315
House
House of Commons

I can confirm that it is absolutely the policy intent of the sponsor for that to be a backstop. The Government are working on that basis to ensure that it is a backstop and not a target.

Amendment 42 seeks to remove the four-year backstop. Although that is a matter for...

Member
Stephen Kinnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 cc1315-6
House
House of Commons

The advocates of the Bill talk about the point of choice and autonomy in the decision about when and where a person will die. Can the Minister confirm whether we have enough doctors to provide a service for people to die at home at the time of their choosing?

Member
Caroline Johnson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1316
House
House of Commons

I refer the hon. Lady to the impact assessment, which is of course not a forecast but a set of scenarios. In it, detail is given on expected numbers and the capacity of the system to deal with the service.

Amendments 13 and 82 to 85 relate to the appointment of...

Member
Stephen Kinnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1316
House
House of Commons

claimed to move the closure (Standing Order No. 36).

Question put forthwith, That the Question be now put.

Question put and agreed to.

New clause 13 accordingly read a Second time, and added to the Bill.

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1316
House
House of Commons

Object.

The Deputy Speaker interrupted the business (Standing Order No. 11(2)).

Bill to be further considered on Friday 20 June.

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2025
Reference
768 c1324
House
House of Commons