Skip to main content

1-20 of 414 results for subject:Devolution

Legislation X
Northern Ireland (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2013-14

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Northern Ireland (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2013-14 (414)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c353
House
House of Commons

Lords amendment 1 is the first of a number of amendments made in another place at the Government’s behest following extensive discussions there. They follow changes we made to the draft Bill after discussions in this House’s Northern Ireland Affairs Committee. I hope that it can therefore be said that...

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c353
House
House of Commons

My colleagues and I are comfortable with Lords amendments 1 to 3, which we think are sensible, so we will not oppose them. Any reduction in the size of the Northern Ireland Assembly should quite rightly be a decision for that Assembly. As an MP who no longer sits in...

Member
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 cc353-4
House
House of Commons

Our party strongly supports reducing the size of government generally in Northern Ireland—and across the United Kingdom for that matter—including the number of Government Departments in Northern Ireland. We are also on record as wanting to see a reduction in the number of Assembly Members. We believe that Northern Ireland...

Member
Lord Dodds of Duncairn (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c354
House
House of Commons

Perhaps when he responds the Minister will say not only whether consultation was held, but with whom it was held and what information was given by the individual parties. That would allow us to see whether the results of the consultation are in line with what he proposes today.

Member
Lord McCrea of Magherafelt and Cookstown (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c355
House
House of Commons

I am sure the Minister will have heard the point that my hon. Friend makes.

Member
Lord Dodds of Duncairn (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c355
House
House of Commons

I will correct this if I am wrong—it was before my time—but my understanding is that as a result of the consultation with the parties in the Assembly, which I believe took some time, the intention was to reduce the size of the Assembly by one Member per constituency. The...

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c355
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for that clarification.

We certainly take on board the reasoning behind the amendment. What strikes me, though, is the Government’s concern about the Assembly passing legislation on a substantial reduction that could disproportionately affect the smaller parties. One of the things that was raised in the previous...

Member
Lord Dodds of Duncairn (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 cc355-6
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the Government on listening to their lordships and accepting these amendments.

Fifteen years on, I am a bit like the Good Friday agreement myself—that much older and that much greyer.

Member
Lord Murphy of Torfaen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c356
House
House of Commons

And wiser.

Member
Lord Robathan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c356
House
House of Commons

Not so much wiser, I think.

I vividly recall that we decided on the final number for the Assembly in the middle of the night on Maundy Thursday. There was an argument that the Assembly should be bigger than it turned out to be—some of the smaller parties thought it was...

Member
Lord Murphy of Torfaen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 cc356-7
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that a deal brokered and supported by one party for republican terrorists who are on the run from justice in Northern Ireland cannot be described as a “so-called” one-sided deal? It is a one-sided deal, and its secrecy makes it a dirty deal as...

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c357
House
House of Commons

Mr Deputy Speaker will stop me if we go into the details of what we discussed some weeks ago, but I will simply say that the principle of all parties agreeing a policy is critical to its success. The issue, as the hon. Gentleman has just said, is one that...

Member
Lord Murphy of Torfaen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c357
House
House of Commons

I also rise to support the Lords amendments. It is worth noting that my party agrees with the Democratic Unionist party on this occasion, because that has been a rather rare occurrence in recent years. We wish to see significant reform of the Assembly structures and the burden they place...

Member
Naomi Long (Alliance)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 cc357-8
House
House of Commons

I apologise for not being in the Chamber when the debate commenced on this very important Bill. Will the hon. Lady identify what the Alliance party believes to be the impediments that the Assembly’s current structures have resulted in?

Member
Lady Hermon (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c358
House
House of Commons

I appreciate the opportunity to do so, but I will not go too far, because Mr Deputy Speaker will be quick to reign me back in. In terms of what the AERC is looking at, we want a review of the question of an addition to the numbers of Members...

Member
Naomi Long (Alliance)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c358
House
House of Commons

I think that anyone listening to this debate would be surprised to hear that, while there appears to be a willingness to see the changes mentioned by the hon. Lady, there has been absolutely no move towards making them. Indeed, a properly structured, effective Opposition could be easily obtained if...

Member
Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c358
House
House of Commons

That is interesting, because it suggests that it might be the DUP’s plan for after the next elections. It, too, has called for a properly structured and funded Opposition at the Assembly, but I do not see it walking away from the post of First Minister and all its other...

Member
Naomi Long (Alliance)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c359
House
House of Commons

Is there any evidence to suggest that the general public in Northern Ireland wish to have an Opposition at Stormont or whether, in fact, they are in favour of power sharing between parties that, collectively do their very best for everyone in Northern Ireland?

Member
Lady Hermon (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c359
House
House of Commons

I think there is evidence that the public would like to see an Opposition, and that evidence is their frustration with the amount that can be delivered under the Executive and the structures as they stand. The most common complaint about the Assembly is its lack of delivery, and I...

Member
Naomi Long (Alliance)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2014
Reference
577 c359
House
House of Commons