Skip to main content

1-20 of 192 results for subject:Testing

Legislation X
Health Bill (HL) 2008-09

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Health Bill (HL) 2008-09 (192)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The hon. Lady is talking persuasively about the effect of packaging and how it influences people. Ann McNeill and others have said that it is precisely the "power wall" of display that influences people, yet the hon. Lady is against doing anything about that.

Member
Andy Slaughter (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c95
House
House of Commons

The difference is that tobacco is an adult product, so there is no reason not to display it. I shall come on to that issue later. There would not necessarily have to be a display ban here, as the new clause might make the display much less attractive by making...

Member
Sandra Gidley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c95
House
House of Commons

I am going to carry on as I have almost concluded my remarks. The argument against plain packs is that they make it easier to counterfeit tobacco products, but it is difficult to distinguish between counterfeits and existing packs in any case, and there are covert markings on most packs,...

Member
Sandra Gidley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c95-6
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Lady accept that a figure of between £1,850 and £5,000 is far too much for a small retailer to bear?

Member
Christopher Fraser (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c96
House
House of Commons

Roughly speaking, around half the people who smoke die, one way or another, as a result of being smokers. Then we have had the effort by the tobacco industry to get into what might be described as tobacco-branded accessories, which involves selling something that looks like Marlboro or Lucky Strike,...

Member
Frank Dobson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c90
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is making some excellent points. He mentioned that half the people who take up smoking will eventually die from it, but has he made any estimate of the number of children, who are now taking up smoking in far too great a number because of the...

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c90
House
House of Commons

No, I will not give way. Other people want to speak. Hardly anybody takes up smoking as an adult. Smoking is taken up by children or those in their late teens. Recently at the O2 Centre in Greenwich—as I understand it, O2 is not one of the oxygens, but it...

Member
Frank Dobson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c90
House
House of Commons

They were wrong then and they are wrong now.

Member
Frank Dobson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c91
House
House of Commons

Just to help my right hon. Friend with the figures, 120,000 people die each year from smoking-related diseases, which is about 400 a day—the equivalent of the number on a jumbo jet falling out of the sky. That is the number of young people whom the tobacco companies need to...

Member
Howard Stoate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c90-1;497 c91
House
House of Commons

I think that I was the first ever person in the House to point out that the tobacco industry needs to recruit 120,000 new smokers a year to make up for the ones it kills in that year. We have to remember that, because the tobacco companies will be standing...

Member
Frank Dobson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c91
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c91
House
House of Commons

The Smee report did say what the hon. Member for Hemel Hempstead (Mike Penning) said, but it also said that people smoke or not depending on whether they have positive or negative attitudes to cigarettes. Surely advertising gives them positive ones.

Member
Kevin Barron (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c91
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend. My new clause 6 would force the tobacco industry to disclose all the information about its scientific and market research. At present, the people with a duty to promote public health, which includes the Government—and, one would hope, the Opposition—as well as Parliament, are...

Member
Frank Dobson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c91
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman not accept that one person’s choice to smoke affects other people’s choice not to smoke? One person’s freedom stops at my nose when it comes to smoking. Although in this issue we are concerned particularly about young people, does he not accept that one person’s choice...

Member
Judy Mallaber (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c100
House
House of Commons

Well, I am glad that the right hon. Gentleman is happy with his position at the time on that issue. The point here is twofold. The right hon. Gentleman’s argument about the misery of tobacco contained one fatal flaw, which is that tobacco is bought by adults. It is a...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c100
House
House of Commons

Adding to that observant point, does the hon. Gentleman agree that, as the large retailers can afford to change their displays and small retailers cannot, those who are addicted to tobacco will be driven to larger shops not just for their cigarettes but for other things as well, therefore achieving...

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c100-1
House
House of Commons

No, I do not. We are getting slightly off the mark here, but the hon. Lady has the freedom to take her nose somewhere else if she does not like what she is smelling. That is the whole point of freedom and choice. We have heard from the right hon....

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c100
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman acknowledge that we banned advertising and promotion?

Member
Frank Dobson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c100
House
House of Commons

I intend to speak only briefly as I know that other Members want to contribute and time is limited. There are a few points I want to make however, largely in response to the points made by the right hon. Members for Holborn and St. Pancras (Frank Dobson) and for...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c99-100
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right, and I hope Labour Members will take that into account.

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c101
House
House of Commons