Skip to main content

1-20 of 47 results for subject:Roads

Legislation X
Lighter Evenings (Experiment) Bill (HL) 2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Lighter Evenings (Experiment) Bill (HL) 2005-06 (47)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

If the noble Lord will gave way, I thought I said at the start of dealing with first amendment that I did not propose to revisit every issue discussed at Second Reading. That issue was touched upon at Second Reading by a number of noble Lords, including my noble friend Lord Sainsbury.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1216
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for giving way. Portugal and Spain have different time zones.

Member
Lord Tanlaw (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1213
House
House of Lords

That is not exactly what I said. I said that I could not think of a state within the European Union where different zones are used within that state. We understand the necessity for different time zones in Russia and the United States, but to have different time zones in the United Kingdom...

Member
Lord Jopling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1213-4
House
House of Lords

I would be concerned if this Bill were passed without a major conundrum being resolved. On the one hand, if Scotland were to join England in advancing its clocks by one hour, it would mean that those at the western and northern extremes would spend a considerable part of the first...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1214
House
House of Lords

I, too, support this amendment. It would be ridiculous and inconvenient to have different time zones between England and Scotland or any other parts of the United Kingdom. As one who lived in the north of Scotland, in north-east Aberdeenshire, through the experimental period back in the 1970s, I can confirm what...

Member
Lady Saltoun of Abernethy (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1214
House
House of Lords

I will briefly make a comment here. I initially said at Second Reading that the real problem is the fact that geography dictates that you only have X amount of light hours in the day, and it is merely a matter of how we use them. I also pointed out at that time,...

Member
Lord Addington (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1215
House
House of Lords

The thrust of Amendment No. 4 is to seek to ensure that the experiment would take place only if each of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland set a date for participation, and one which would have to be before 25 October 2009, when the Act would expire. As the noble Lord, Lord Jopling, acknowledged, the wording...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1215
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for giving way. How on earth can children go from England to Scotland? How many schools go from England to Scotland in the course of a day to check their watches? I would be interested to know. The noble Lord makes it sound as though this happens right across...

Member
Lord Tanlaw (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1215
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for giving way. He is quite right, but he has failed to mention what was an emotional charge to that debate, owing to a tragic accident where a school bus ran over a crocodile of school children in Stornoway. That was the main reason for the objection...

Member
Lord Tanlaw (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1212
House
House of Lords

All I can say to the noble Lord is that that is not my recollection. All Members of the House had received a torrent of letters from people giving reasons quite different from the road safety aspect. I agree that that was a part of it, but it is my strong recollection that...

Member
Lord Jopling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1212-3
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 2:"Page 2, line 7, leave out paragraphs (c) and (d)." On Question, amendment agreed to. [Amendment No. 3 not moved.]

Member
Lord Tanlaw (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1211
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 4:"Page 2, line 13, at end insert—" ““( ) This Act shall come into force only if a commencement date has been appointed in all of the cases in paragraphs (a) to (d) of subsection (2).”” The noble Lord said: I apologise to the Committee that I was not able to be here...

Member
Lord Jopling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1211-2
House
House of Lords

It falls to me to set out the Government’s position on the amendments. Noble Lords will be aware of the history of the issue, which was reviewed by my noble friend Lord Sainsbury at Second Reading last month. He outlined on that occasion why the Government see no reason to change...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1209-10
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 1A:"Page 2, line 4, leave out ““2006”” and insert ““2008””" The noble Lord said: As I argued on Second Reading, if there are enough people in this country who want to sacrifice lighter mornings in favour of lighter evenings, in most cases there is nothing to stop them collectively in conjunction with...

Member
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1210-1
House
House of Lords

I also do not feel happy with the amendment. It may be worth saying that I have been advised by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents that it takes at least three years to accumulate data to find out which is the better—lighter evenings or lighter mornings. This is the...

Member
Lord Tanlaw (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1211
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Jopling, for his support. I see the merits in his amendments. It is better to try the voluntary route first rather than rushing into the compulsory one, as my noble friend Lord Tanlaw proposes. However, this is not my preferred amendment: I shall return to the matter...

Member
Lord Monson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1211
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord’s amendment is in many ways similar to my Amendment No. 3. All I will say at this stage is that I am particularly keen in a few moments to move Amendment No. 4, which is extremely important. I certainly support what the noble Lord said in moving the amendment. If we are to...

Member
Lord Jopling (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1211
House
House of Lords

I repeat that this amendment also does not give us any greater comfort on the Bill. I add that there is nothing at the moment to stop people experimenting with changed working arrangements and it does not require the Bill to facilitate that.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1211
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 1:"Page 1, line 18, leave out ““decision of whether to bring into force in Scotland”” and insert ““subject-matter of””" The noble Lord said: In speaking to Amendment No. 1, I shall speak also to Amendments No. 2 and 5. They are basically technical amendments suggested by the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee that has reported...

Member
Lord Tanlaw (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1209
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do now resolve itself into Committee on this Bill. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. House in Committee accordingly. [The DEPUTY CHAIRMAN OF COMMITTEES (Lord Haskel) in the Chair.] Clauses 1 to 3 agreed to. Clause 4 [Amendment of Scotland Act 1998]:

Member
Lord Tanlaw (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1209
House
House of Lords