Skip to main content

1-20 of 42 results for house:"House of Lords"

Legislation X
Investigatory Powers Bill 2015-16 to 2016-17
Member X
Lord Strasburger

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Strasburger, Lord (42)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Investigatory Powers Bill 2015-16 to 2016-17 (42)
More

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank the noble Earl for giving way. I would like to share with him a direct quotation from one of the six members of the Leveson inquiry—someone with whom I spoke this morning.

He said, “The consultation announced this week is just a shabby stunt, probably concocted by Paul...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2016
Reference
776 c653
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall rise to that opportunity. Amendment 251, in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Harris, and my noble friends Lord Paddick and Lady Hamwee, addresses one particular kind of encryption—namely end-to-end encryption—and it is very good as far as it goes, which is end-to-end encryption. My...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2016
Reference
774 cc2399-2401
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if the noble Earl is so confident that none of the unintended consequences listed in Amendment 252A can occur, and that the Government do not want them to occur, what is his objection to putting them into the Bill?

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2016
Reference
774 c2409
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak to Amendments 100C, 100D and 100E which have been very ably explained by my noble friend Lord Paddick.

When vague and non-specific legislation comes before us, it is perhaps because its authors are unable to be more precise because they have not thought it through...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2016
Reference
774 cc2132-3
House
House of Lords

Amendment 118A seeks to prevent the creation and collection of internet connection records. My noble friend Lord Paddick has explained why ICRs are of little security value, and that they would be very difficult and expensive to collect and make use of. The only democracy to try was Denmark, which...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2016
Reference
774 cc2149-2150
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had the privilege of sitting on the Joint Committee on the Bill and on the Joint Committee on its precursor, the Communications

Data Bill, three years earlier. That puts me in a position to inform the House about one example of how technology has come to this...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 September 2016
Reference
774 c1312
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would like to put three questions to the Government, which arise from Mr Anderson’s latest report. There are not many surprises in the report but one of them—certainly to me and most other people who follow these matters—was the revelation that bulk personal datasets are used by...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2016
Reference
774 c1052
House
House of Lords

The noble Earl spoke at some length about the utility of bulk personal datasets to the intelligence agencies, but he did not answer my question, which was generated by the revelation in Mr Anderson’s report that bodies other than the intelligence agencies have access to bulk personal datasets. Which other...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2016
Reference
774 c1056
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak briefly on the amendments on the request filter. Along with internet connection records, the request filter is another power that first appeared in the draft Communications Data Bill and which died along with that ill-fated Bill. The view of the pre-legislative Joint Committee on that...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2016
Reference
774 c548
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Strasburger

147A: After Clause 72, insert the following new Clause—

“Authorisation to obtain data from an internet connection record

An authorisation to obtain data from an internet connection record is not to have effect until such time (if any) as a Judicial Commissioner has approved it.”

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2016
Reference
774 c556
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak to Amendment 147A in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Paddick. My noble friend also has Amendment 156A in this group and he will speak to that amendment; I may have something to add on it after he has spoken.

Amendment 147A...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2016
Reference
774 cc556-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak to Amendment 156A and cite the simple facts about internet connection records. They do not currently exist, would be very difficult and costly to manufacture, have very limited usefulness and collecting and storing them, far from making us safer, would expose everyone in Britain...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2016
Reference
774 cc560-2
House
House of Lords

I assure my noble friend and the noble Lord, Lord King, that the report by the Joint Committee was not unanimous. We had something like 10 divisions, and for some peculiar reason I found myself on the wrong end of most of them.

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2016
Reference
774 c564
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the House for an interesting and lively debate, which this subject absolutely deserves. I am somewhat disconcerted by an assertion made by the Minister and one or two other noble Lords. Just because the Bill has been heavily scrutinised—I fully recognise that, and if it is...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2016
Reference
774 c573
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while my noble friend searches for his notes, would it be appropriate for me to make my short speech on this matter? No? I was just trying to help.

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2016
Reference
774 c584
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Committee will get a feeling of déjà vu.

I rise to speak to Amendment 159 and others, and start by acknowledging that equipment interference—hacking, in common parlance—with a person’s computer or phone can be justified by known or suspected threats or by an actual incidence of serious crime....

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2016
Reference
774 c585
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend is quite right: I feel the need to intervene on Amendment 176A. There seems to be a strong consensus among the bodies that considered the Bill in its draft stages and beforehand that there should be a commission rather than commissioners. The Joint Committee made...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2016
Reference
774 c624
House
House of Lords

I just wonder whether all the expenditure that the Minister is listing does not apply just as much to the commissioners as to any commission.

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2016
Reference
774 c625
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this debate on who should appoint the judicial commissioners was discussed at length in the Joint Committee, and we heard lots of

evidence on it. The conclusion was that the commissioners might be a little more independent if they were appointed by the Lord Chief Justice rather than...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 July 2016
Reference
774 c631
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak to Amendment 41, which seeks to remove the requirement for a judicial commissioner to apply judicial review principles when approving warrants. I do so with some trepidation as I am only the second noble Lord who is not a lawyer to venture into this...

Member
Lord Strasburger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
774 c225
House
House of Lords