Skip to main content

1-20 of 168 results for subject:Protection

Legislation X
Children and Social Work Bill (HL) 2016-17

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Children and Social Work Bill (HL) 2016-17 (168)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, the Government want all children to have access to age-appropriate relationships education, relationships and sex education—RSE—and personal, social, health and economic education that relate to the modern world. We believe this is vital to ensuring that pupils are taught the knowledge and skills they need to stay safe...

Member
Lord Nash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 April 2017
Reference
782 cc961-4
House
House of Lords

Can the Secretary of State explain her U-turn in signing Labour’s amendments to scrap her own innovation clauses in the Children and Social Work Bill? Since her Minister and chief social worker were the key protagonists of those strongly opposed and dangerous clauses, will she explain how she can possibly remain confident in their ability to protect our most vulnerable children?

Asked by
Emma Lewell (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2017
Reference
623 c637
House
House of Commons

I am very pleased to see the hon. Lady back in her place. I know she has not been able to be here for some time. It is very simple: we were unable

to build the consensus required to take forward the power to innovate. I remain absolutely committed to innovation and would welcome local authorities’ plans for how they can improve outcomes for children by redesigning their services and improving their outcomes in the process.

Answered by
Edward Timpson (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 March 2017
Reference
623 c637
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Edward Timpson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c695
House
House of Commons

I shall deal first with new clauses 15 and 16, which relate to relationships and sex education and personal, social, health and economic education. I shall then respond to key points raised in other new clauses and amendments. I shall ensure that they are covered within the time that is...

Member
Edward Timpson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c700
House
House of Commons

I warmly welcome these vital and long overdue new clauses, but it would be helpful if the Minister could provide some reassurance that relationship education in primary schools will not exclude key age-appropriate information that relates to physical health, wellbeing, and the safety of children, because that is an area...

Member
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c701
House
House of Commons

I can reassure the hon. Lady that the whole purpose of bringing relationships education into primary schools is to start creating the all-important building blocks that will make children resilient enough to deal with the pressures and risks that the modern world throws at them. The new clauses are intended...

Member
Edward Timpson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c701
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Barry Sheerman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c701
House
House of Commons

I will, but I should make it clear to Members that I do not want to curtail the opportunities for others to have their say, and I want to deal with other aspects of the Bill as well.

Member
Edward Timpson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c701
House
House of Commons

The Minister will remember what we discussed in those happy days when we served together on the Education Committee. It is all very well to have an obligation, and this is a real step forward, but the fact is that if we do not give the people in the schools...

Member
Barry Sheerman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c701
House
House of Commons

We served on that Committee such a while ago that it was then called the Children, Schools and Families Committee. In 2013, Ofsted acknowledged that the teaching of these subjects was still not as good as it should be. We shall be working with teachers and schools so that they...

Member
Edward Timpson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c701
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister include the Church of England in his list of organisations that support the Government’s proposals? Despite its support, the Church seeks reassurance that relationships education will be respectful of the ethos of the schools where it is taught.

Member
Caroline Spelman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c701
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for that clear indication of the Church of England’s support for the step that we are taking. Having engaged with the Church and with representatives of other faiths throughout the process, I am aware of that support. The religious faith that brings...

Member
Edward Timpson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c701
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend give way?

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c702
House
House of Commons

I will give way briefly, but then I want to try to make some progress.

Member
Edward Timpson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c702
House
House of Commons

New clause 15 draws a distinction between relationships education provided for primary school children and relationships and sex education provided for secondary school children. Can the Minister confirm that that does not mean that sex education will be smuggled into primary schools under the label “relationships education”?

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c702
House
House of Commons

A clear distinction is drawn by the very name of each of those subjects. The new clause makes plain that sex education will not be a statutory part of primary school teaching. Of course, if primary schools choose to teach sex education in an age-appropriate way, as they can now,...

Member
Edward Timpson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c702
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Dan Poulter (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c702
House
House of Commons

I will give way to my hon. Friend, but then I must make some more progress.

Member
Edward Timpson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c702
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend and the Secretary of State on new clause 15, which is long overdue, but may I ask a specific question about faith schools and other schools of that type? New clause 15(3)(b) states that it must be ensured that

“the education is appropriate having regard to...

Member
Dan Poulter (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2017
Reference
622 c702
House
House of Commons