Skip to main content

1-20 of 40 results for subject:Abuse

Legislation X
Digital Economy Bill 2016-17

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Digital Economy Bill 2016-17 (40)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I want again to start by saying that the Government accept and agree with the spirit of Lords Amendment 40, but, as drafted, it poses difficulties and risks unintended consequences. For example, it is not clear who would notify social media providers that content contravened existing legislation. The...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1491-2
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 1.

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
624 c1122
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I have it in command from Her Majesty the Queen and His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales to acquaint the House that they, having been informed of the purport of the Digital Economy Bill, have consented to place their interests, so far as they are affected by...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1088
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Stevenson of Balmacara

1: Clause 3, page 3, line 26, leave out “switch” and insert “roam”

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1088
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a technical amendment in the sense that it seeks to correct an error which seems to have been made

inadvertently in the run-up to Report. As a result— for no particular purpose, these things just happen— Clause 3(1)(b) states,

“allow the end-user to switch (at no extra...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1088-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have just been informed by my noble and learned friend that all amendments lead to Rome. We accept that a genuine mistake was made in tabling the original amendment. Therefore, we will accept this amendment today. However, the Government have set out the arguments against requiring network...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1089-1091
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to the Minister for that response. I sense that we may be seeing this issue again, so I will not delay the House further. I just want to put on the record that, if there has been a reduction in the number of not-spots, it must...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1091
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

2: Clause 10, leave out Clause 10

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1091
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a group of technical amendments to ensure that the legislation is as clear and consistent as possible.

Amendment 2 removes Clause 10, which creates a new power for the Secretary of State to set a statement of strategic priorities relating to the management of radio spectrum. On...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1091-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome these tidying-up amendments. I want to take the opportunity provided by this Third Reading debate to congratulate the Government once again on taking action to protect children from pornography on the internet through age verification. I shall be watching the implementation of Part 3 of the...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1092-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not wish to detain the House unduly on these amendments. I welcome, in particular, Amendment 9 as it is the fulfilment of a pledge made by the Minister on Report. I am delighted that Section 73 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act will be no...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1093
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the noble Lord, Lord Ashton, for tabling Amendment 12, which gives greater clarity to the BT and Openreach employees covered by the provisions of Clause 119. The Government have also made clear their intention to engage fully with the BT pension scheme trustee and for...

Member
Baroness Drake (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1093
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for those comments. I take the point of the noble Baroness,

Lady Howe, that there is still work to do. As she mentioned, the internet safety strategy Green Paper will be with us in June.

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1093
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

3: Clause 16, page 20, line 1, leave out paragraph (b)

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1094
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

4: Clause 19, page 23, line 10, leave out “the House of Commons and the House of Lords” and insert “each House of Parliament”

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1094
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

5: Clause 20, page 23, line 26, leave out “a” and insert “any other”

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1094
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

6: Clause 23, page 26, line 42, at end insert—

“(6) For the purposes of subsection (5)(b), a means of accessing the internet does not include a device or other equipment for doing so.”

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1094
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

9: Clause 37, page 36, line 8, leave out subsections (3) to (5)

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1095
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Ashton of Hyde

10: Clause 113, page 124, line 3, at end insert—

“( ) such representatives of persons likely to be affected by the regulations as the Secretary of State thinks appropriate, and

( ) such other persons as the Secretary of State thinks appropriate.”

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 c1095
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government’s Amendments 10 and 11 acknowledge the DPRRC’s recommendations in relation to improved safeguards for the proposed charging regulations for the Information Commissioner. I committed to making these amendments on Report.

Amendment 10 will make it a requirement for the Secretary of State to consult,

“such representatives of persons...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
782 cc1095-6
House
House of Lords