Letter dated 04/02/2019 from Lord Henley to Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted regarding the EU Exit Trade Marks Statutory Instrument [Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018] and the instrument's approach to pending EU trade mark applications. 2p.

Letter dated 04/02/2019 from Lord Henley to Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted regarding the EU Exit Trade Marks Statutory Instrument [Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018] and the instrument's approach to pending EU trade mark applications. 2p.

Letter dated 21/01/2019 from Lord Henley to Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted and others regarding issues raised during the Grand Committee debate on the Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018, the Patents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 and the Intellectual Property (Exhaustion of Rights) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018. 7p.

Letter dated 21/01/2019 from Lord Henley to Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted and others regarding issues raised during the Grand Committee debate on the Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018, the Patents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018 and the Intellectual Property (Exhaustion of Rights) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018. 7p.

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Not content.

Not content.

Not content.

Not content.

Not content.

Not content.

The noble Lord said that he will apologise; when will that happen?

The noble Lord said that he will apologise; when will that happen?

Paragraph 10.1 of the Explanatory Memorandum says:

“No formal consultation has been carried”.

Paragraph 10.1 of the Explanatory Memorandum says:

“No formal consultation has been carried”.

My Lords—

My Lords—

I am grateful. The Minister has just referred to consultation. Paragraph 10.1 of the Explanatory Notes merely says:

“The Intellectual Property Office has undertaken information gathering with stakeholders”—

we do not know who they are—and that:

“No formal consultation has been carried”.

Why has it not been done before?

I am grateful. The Minister has just referred to consultation. Paragraph 10.1 of the Explanatory Notes merely says:

“The Intellectual Property Office has undertaken information gathering with stakeholders”—

we do not know who they are—and that:

“No formal consultation has been carried”.

Why has it not been done before?

My Lords, I did not come to Grand Committee today expecting to speak on intellectual property. I am here to do financial services but, since I spent the best part of 40 years as a European patent attorney, it is hard not to intervene a little. I remember very well...

My Lords, I did not come to Grand Committee today expecting to speak on intellectual property. I am here to do financial services but, since I spent the best part of 40 years as a European patent attorney, it is hard not to intervene a little. I remember very well...

The issue is where something has come from. You could export it under the terms of a licence, but you might have got it from some third country. In the Wella case, it was the US. It became very difficult to determine where the precise shampoo in question had come...

The issue is where something has come from. You could export it under the terms of a licence, but you might have got it from some third country. In the Wella case, it was the US. It became very difficult to determine where the precise shampoo in question had come...

The point about the impact assessment concerns me. The noble Lord, Lord Bates, who is eagerly awaiting our later exchanges, knows that I have been here before. Forgive me if I am paraphrasing the Minister, but what seems to have been said is that, when the impact assessments are done,...

The point about the impact assessment concerns me. The noble Lord, Lord Bates, who is eagerly awaiting our later exchanges, knows that I have been here before. Forgive me if I am paraphrasing the Minister, but what seems to have been said is that, when the impact assessments are done,...

My Lords, if it is convenient, I shall speak also to the Patents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018—

My Lords, if it is convenient, I shall speak also to the Patents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018—

Will the noble Lord give way until I complete this sentence? I shall speak also to the Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018, which were laid before the House on 28 November. I shall give way to whichever noble Lord wishes to speak first.

Will the noble Lord give way until I complete this sentence? I shall speak also to the Trade Marks (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018, which were laid before the House on 28 November. I shall give way to whichever noble Lord wishes to speak first.

May I ask that these regulations be considered separately? Can the noble Lord also tell us whether they have been debated in the House of Commons? I could not find any reference to a Hansard account of such a debate in the Commons. If they have been, can he give...

May I ask that these regulations be considered separately? Can the noble Lord also tell us whether they have been debated in the House of Commons? I could not find any reference to a Hansard account of such a debate in the Commons. If they have been, can he give...

My Lords, I am not aware that these regulations have yet been through the Commons, but they will in the usual way in due course. It has been agreed, and it has been advertised on the Order Paper, that we would take these three regulations—

My Lords, I am not aware that these regulations have yet been through the Commons, but they will in the usual way in due course. It has been agreed, and it has been advertised on the Order Paper, that we would take these three regulations—

With respect, that is only if everyone agrees—and I for one do not agree.

With respect, that is only if everyone agrees—and I for one do not agree.

I notice that the noble Lord does not agree, but in line with the usual courtesies of the House, it would have been helpful if he had at least mentioned this to his noble friend the Opposition Chief Whip or even to my noble friend the Government Chief Whip.

I notice that the noble Lord does not agree, but in line with the usual courtesies of the House, it would have been helpful if he had at least mentioned this to his noble friend the Opposition Chief Whip or even to my noble friend the Government Chief Whip.