Skip to main content

1-20 of 522 results for subject:Dissolution

Legislation X
Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Bill 2021-22

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Bill 2021-22 (522)
More

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022 received Royal Assent on 24 March 2022. The Prime Minister is now able to request a dissolution at the time of their choosing.

Type
Briefing papers on bills
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
CBP-9308
Type
Public acts
Date
24 March 2022
Reference
2022 c. 11; CHAP 11 2022

This briefing paper sets out the elections that are scheduled for 2022 and future years up until 2026.The elections covered include General Elections to the House of Commons, for devolved legislatures (Senedd Cymru/Welsh Parliament, Scottish Parliament, Northern Ireland Assembly), London Assembly and Mayor of London, local authorities (in England, Wales,...

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
23 March 2022
Reference
CBP-9404

Moved by

Lord True

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c855
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with the leave of the House, I will briefly remind your Lordships of where we find ourselves. Your Lordships’ House amended the Bill, which had been passed by the other place, to give the Commons the right to a veto on dissolution and invited the other place to...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c856
House
House of Lords

My Lords, after a short debate in the other place, the amendment proposed by this House was disagreed, and here we are today. There is still an issue: we believe the Dissolution of Parliament should not be based on the revival of the prerogative, but the other place takes a...

Member
Lord Judge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc856-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope we are all agreed that we should not insist on the amendment that we passed on the previous occasion. However, we were right to ask the other place to think again. Indeed, even though it was a relatively short debate, and programmed as such, it was...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c857
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we should not let this moment pass without reminding ourselves of precisely what a bizarre set of circumstances we find ourselves in. I remind the House that the Lords amendment that we sent to the Commons says:

“The powers referred to in subsection (1)”

—that is, the power to dissolve...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc857-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have mixed feelings on this occasion. As the House may remember from my remarks on Report, I always thought that our amendment to the Bill that we passed back to the Commons was a second best. I also regret, as the noble Lord has just said, that...

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c858
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I fear that if we had removed Clause 3, although I was very sympathetic to that line of argument, as the noble Lord knows, we

would have had the same result. The Commons, whipped, would have sent back the Bill with Clause 3 reinserted. We should not delude...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc858-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I echo the sentiments of the noble Lord, Lord Grocott. This is a bizarre situation, in that we said to the House of Commons, “We think, O House of Commons, that you ought to have a bit more power on one of the most important acts of the...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c859
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we laugh, and in some ways, it is amusing. It is also extraordinary—I am not sure that it is amusing. The Fixed-term Parliaments Act was an Act of its time whose main purpose was to protect the coalition Government, and it succeeded in that to a degree. I...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc859-860
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken. I say to the noble Baroness that this Bill did receive detailed pre-legislative scrutiny; it was considered by a Joint Committee of both Houses and Ministers were scrutinised by committees in both Houses. Ministers in both Houses—I have had some...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c860
House
House of Lords

Just to help the Minister, that is exactly the point I was making about the Fixed-term Parliaments Act not having proper scrutiny and getting us into the position we are in now.

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c860
House
House of Lords

I was agreeing with the noble Baroness on that. The Fixed-term Parliaments Act was an aberration from 2011 to 2022. Some noble Lords have expressed shock that the House of Commons would wish to return to an arrangement which endured for generations. I do not share that shock.

The noble Lord,...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc860-1
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons reason for disagreeing to a Lords amendment. The Lords amendment not insisted on and the Commons reason agreed to.

Lead member
Lord True
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc855-861
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 1.

The Bill passed through the other place, where it was carefully scrutinised and amended in only one respect: to seek to retain a role for this honourable House in respect of Dissolution. The Lords amendment provided that the Prime...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons

I am hugely relieved to hear the Minister say that. I have stood in every election since 1997. Only when we saw the chaos caused by a Government who did not want to continue and an Opposition who did not want the chance to face an election could we see...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons

I agree with my right hon. Friend; there is of course a good reason why the 2017 to 2019 Parliament is referred to as the zombie Parliament.

I remind the House of the commitments that both parties made in 2019. The Conservatives committed to repealing the Fixed-term Parliaments Act.

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister confirm that, if we dismiss Lords amendment 1 today, the courts will not have a role in fixing the dates for elections, because, surely, that is matter for us, answerable to the electors?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons