Skip to main content

1-20 of 129 results for house:"House of Lords"

Legislation X
Public Order Bill 2022-23
Subject X
Accountability

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Public Order Bill 2022-23 (129)

Subject

More
Accountability (129)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords committee stage second day. Clauses 9 to 15 agreed to. Clause 16 agreed to as amended. Clauses 17 and 18 agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Davies of Gower; Lord Sharpe of Epsom; Lord Murray of Blidworth
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1289-1362
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Baroness Fox of Buckley

80: Clause 9, page 10, line 28, after first “who” insert “, without reasonable excuse,”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment provides for a defence where the person has a reasonable excuse for being within a buffer zone and has access to that defence prior to charge.

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1289
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak to a range of amendments associated with Clause 9: Amendments 80, 81, 82, 83, 86, 89, 92 and 94. I have also put my name to Amendments 88 and 90 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Beith, and have some sympathy with Amendments...

Member
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1289-1293
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 80A is in my name. I will also speak to the other amendments in this group. I welcome the Government’s commitment at Second Reading to introduce zones around all clinics in England and Wales to ensure that women are able to access their legal right to abortion...

Member
Baroness Sugg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1293-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendments 98 and 99, to which my noble friend Lady Sugg just referred. We need to stand back. Our constitutional responsibility in this House is to scrutinise, amend and, where necessary, push back on legislation that is unwise or uncompliant. We have particular leeway...

Member
Lord Farmer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1294-7
House
House of Lords

Would the noble Lord address the point that regulations are unamendable?

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1297
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Viscount for the intervention. I would have thought that regulations are amendable by a debate in this House.

Member
Lord Farmer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1297
House
House of Lords

They are not, and they never have been.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1297
House
House of Lords

These regulations would allow for sunset and review provisions to be included, so the legislation can cease to have effect if appropriate, as I said.

I was talking about how regulations that require consultation with key stakeholders and need approval by both Houses improve on the current public spaces protection order...

Member
Lord Farmer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1297-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to Amendment 98 in the name of Lord Farmer, and Amendments 88 and 90 in the names of the noble Lord, Lord Beith, the noble Baronesses, Lady Fox and Lady Hoey, and the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of St Albans.

Amendment 98 would correct one...

Member
Lord McAvoy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1298-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand that the Minister has already concluded that freedoms will be curtailed by an over-emphasis on the problems surrounding abortion clinics. Before we embark on legislation, it is essential to have accurate information about what people are complaining about. Clearly, people attending abortion clinics should not be...

Member
Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1299-1300
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak to my Amendments 85, 88 and 90 to this clause. I make it clear that, although I have regularly voted to secure more protection for the unborn child under abortion law, I am opposed to the kind of protest outside clinics and hospitals to which Clause...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1300-2
House
House of Lords

I rise to address Amendments 85 to 88, 90 and 92, to which my right reverend friend the Bishop of St Albans has added his name. He regrets that he is unable to be in his place today. I also have sympathy with a number of other amendments in this...

Member
Bishop of Manchester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1302-3
House
House of Lords

I have some difficulty in understanding the thinking behind this amendment. If a sermon was being preached in a church or mosque, which is what we are being asked to contemplate, that sermon would not in any way impact on the person visiting the abortion clinic some distance away.

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1303
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Viscount for his intervention. As the noble Lord, Lord Beith, said a few minutes ago, you might have a poster outside the church, mosque or temple saying that you are having a particular event on a particular day. It appears that would be caught by this...

Member
Bishop of Manchester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1303-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to support many of the people who have spoken today but in particular the amendments, which I have co-signed, in the name of the noble Baronesses, Lady Sugg and Lady Barker. However, having listened to the debate very thoroughly, and being a believer in free speech,...

Member
Baroness Watkins of Tavistock (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1304
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am in agreement with the Clause 9 amendments put forward by the noble Baroness, Lady Fox of Buckley, and the noble Lords, Lord Farmer and Lord Beith. As these amendments highlight, there are several severe problems with Clause 9, and it will take more than mere window...

Member
Baroness Eaton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1304-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, a lot of reference has been made to the 2018 Home Office review. Does my noble friend not recognise this 20% increase in clinics that have been targeted, or that over 50% of women have to attend clinics that have been targeted? I am not sure how many...

Member
Baroness Sugg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1305
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Baroness think that these women are lying about how they feel about the approaches they get outside those clinics?

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1305
House
House of Lords

No I am not, but it is a different thing than finding people guilty of allegedly interfering and charging them with criminal activity.

Amendment 86 is particularly important in light of the available evidence, which shows that buffer zones are not needed outside every abortion clinic. The 2018 review commissioned by...

Member
Baroness Eaton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1305
House
House of Lords