Skip to main content

1-20 of 60 results for member:"Lord Coaker"

Legislation X
National Security Bill 2022-23

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
National Security Bill 2022-23 (60)

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords consideration of Commons amendment and reason. Lords amendment 22B not insisted on. Lords amendment 122B not insisted on, Commons amendment 122C in lieu agreed to, and Lords amendment 122D to Commons amendment 122C disagreed to on division (201 to 210).

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Answering member
Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
4 July 2023
Reference
831 cc1121-1133
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by saying how much we support the amendments of the noble Lord, Lord Carlile. I am glad that the Government have listened and come to an amicable agreement with the noble Lord which takes us forward. I thank the Minister for the way he has done...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2023
Reference
831 cc1131-2
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons amendments and reasons. Lords amendment 22 not insisted on and amendment 22B in lieu agreed to on division (219 to 172). Commons amendments 26A and 26B to Lords amendment 26 agreed to. Lords amendment 122 not insisted on and Lords amendment 122B in lieu agreed to...

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Answering member
Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
21 June 2023
Reference
831 cc226-246
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak to my amendment in Motion C1. We very much support the amendment put forward by the noble Lord, Lord Carlile. Should he wish to press it, we will certainly support him in the Lobbies later.

I am grateful to the Minister for his comments and for...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2023
Reference
831 cc231-5
House
House of Lords

I take that point, and I apologise if I suggested it was the other way around. The point I am making is that the Prime Minister, according to the information here, used to go and speak with the Intelligence and Security Committee, and there was that two-way communication. My contention...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2023
Reference
831 cc233-6
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Coaker

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2023
Reference
831 c246
House
House of Lords

King's consent signified. Prince of Wales's consent signified. Lords third reading. Amendments 1 to 9 agreed to. Bill passed and returned to the Commons with amendments.

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Answering member
Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
13 March 2023
Reference
828 cc1089-1095
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking the Minister for his constructive engagement, along with his colleagues, the noble and learned Lord, Lord Bellamy, and the noble Lord, Lord Murray, and

others, including his Bill team. The Bill has had significant changes made to it, showing the way this Chamber can...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2023
Reference
828 cc1093-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope the Chamber will indulge me. I forgot to thank Ben Wood, who is our adviser. I apologise to him for that.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2023
Reference
828 c1095
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage second day. Amendments 87 to 90, 92 to 95, 97 to 104, 107 to 110A, 112 and 113, 115 to 120, 123 to 153, 154A to 166, 167, 169 to 173, 177 and 181 to 184 agreed to. Amendment 185 disagreed to on division (93 to 197)....

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom; Lord Bellamy
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office; Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Date
7 March 2023
Reference
828 cc693-766
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is the first opportunity I have had to join other noble Lords in thanking the Minister for the various significant changes the Government have made to the National Security Bill and the improvement they have brought.

I shall speak to my Amendments 192 and 193. Again, I thank...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2023
Reference
828 cc739-743
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Lord moves on to a different amendment, can he answer my question? How can Select Committee members, who do not have the necessary security clearance, possibly look at and scrutinise classified material on Parliament’s behalf?

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2023
Reference
828 c747
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Coaker

193: After Clause 91, insert the following new Clause—

“Duty to update the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament's memorandum of understanding

(1) The Prime Minister must ensure that the memorandum of understanding between the Prime Minister and the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament (the “ISC”) under section 2...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2023
Reference
828 c748
House
House of Lords

As I indicated, I would like to test the opinion of the House.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2023
Reference
828 c748
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Coaker

195: After Clause 91, insert the following new Clause—

“Proscription of organisations: hostile activity on behalf of another State

(1) Within six months of this Act receiving Royal Assent, the Secretary of State must publish draft legislation establishing a process for the proscription of actors engaged in hostile activity within...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2023
Reference
828 c748
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 195, I will not speak at great length. The amendment requires the Secretary of State to propose a new proscription process for actors engaged in hostile

state activity on behalf of other states, or indeed non- state organisations acting for a state or those who...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2023
Reference
828 cc748-753
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his response. Of course the Government are carefully considering this. I do not for one moment believe that they are not thinking about or carefully considering it—that would be an insult to the British Government. Of course they are concerned about national security and...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2023
Reference
828 cc758-760
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage first day. Amendment 1 agreed to. Amendment 4 disagreed to on division (79 to 226). Amendments 7, 9 to 11, 13, 16 and 17 agreed to. Amendment 18 disagreed to on division (82 to 212). Amendment 18A disagreed to on division (155 to 209). Amendments 19, 20,...

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom; Lord Murray of Blidworth
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 cc248-344
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to say that we very much support Amendment 51 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Carlile; were he to push it to a vote, we would certainly support him in that Division.

I do not want to repeat much of what has been said...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 cc297-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a really important debate. Government Amendment 66 is a considerable improvement on what we had before, with respect to Clause 30. We have heard from noble Lords about their belief in that and their pleasure that we now see Amendment 66 before us. As my noble...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2023
Reference
828 cc315-6
House
House of Lords