Skip to main content

1-20 of 26 results for house:"House of Lords"

Legislation X
Post Office (Horizon System) Compensation Bill 2023-24
Subject X
Accountability

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More
Post Office (Horizon System) Compensation Bill 2023-24 (26)

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords second reading. Committee negatived. Standing Order 44 having been dispensed with, Lords third reading. Bill passed.

Lead member
Lord Offord of Garvel
Answering member
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride
Department
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Debates on bills
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc379-413
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister; it is a pleasure to follow him. I am particularly grateful for the way that he dealt with matters last week, and the way that he has continued to deal with them today. I will attempt to emulate not just his tone but his...

Member
Baroness Chakrabarti (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc381-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too thank the Minister and the noble Baroness, Lady Chakrabarti, for their comments. I agree entirely with all that they said. We on these Benches support the Bill in its limited objectives. It simply provides financial power to the Secretary of State for expenditure on the compensation...

Member
Lord Palmer of Childs Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc383-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend the Minister for his opening remarks, not least for their tone, which this House has always got right. I am also grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Chakrabarti—except for her suggestion that this should be called the Arbuthnot Act. She made...

Member
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c384
House
House of Lords

No!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c384
House
House of Lords

I feel a little talked out. That too, your Lordships will be pleased to hear, will shorten this speech dramatically.

This Bill is with us at the request of the chairman of the public inquiry to ensure that the Government do not run out of time to pay compensation or, as...

Member
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc384-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a privilege and an honour to follow the noble Lord, Lord Arbuthnot, particularly on the Second Reading of a Bill which, whether he likes it or not, is already referred to as the Arbuthnot Bill, and if I have anything to do with it, will continue...

Member
Lord Browne of Ladyton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc386-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this Bill is welcome because we needed to see some action from the Government. It is very good, but of course there are a lot of questions that remain to be answered. I am curious about how many of these will get an answer over the next few...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc387-390
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thought for a dreadful moment that I was going to say, “I agree with everything the noble Baroness said”, but she

spoiled it with her party-political points at the end. She will forgive me if I do not pick up on them, but what she had to...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc390-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a huge pleasure to follow the noble Lord, who has probably spoken for those people watching and listening tonight. What he is saying is that there needs to be a real, deep-rooted look at how we work generally within

Government and in Parliament, and particularly with...

Member
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc393-5
House
House of Lords

I am glad to follow the noble Baroness, not least because I agree so passionately with what she and others have said about my noble friend Lord Arbuthnot. He has been exemplary in the way that he has behaved. He has been persistent, tenacious and, in the end, successful, but...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc395-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a rare occasion on which I agree with everything that has been said. No amount of compensation can compensate these people for the pain they have suffered—not only them but also their families and friends. I have a number of questions for the Minister, and I...

Member
Lord Sikka (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc397-400
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I enthusiastically support this legislation, which has received support from every corner of this House—even from the sober representation of the Democratic Unionists. I suspect that we are not responsible for very many of the bottles of champagne that the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, made reference to earlier.

This...

Member
Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc399-402
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had an extraordinary debate on compensation, exoneration and accountability, but this very short, two-clause paving legislation to grant the power to incur expenditure in relation to compensation for the victims—the postmasters and postmistresses—is absolutely vital. However, the detail that we have been discussing is not in...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc401-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome this Bill and am glad that the Government have accepted Sir Wyn Williams’s recommendations in his interim report that the current deadline for compensation must be extended. It is my hope, as has been said by many this evening, that the extra time the Bill provides...

Member
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc403-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is with great responsibility that I stand to conclude what has been a respectful debate. We have heard many insightful

and personal contributions from noble Lords across this House. I particularly echo the numerous and heartfelt tributes paid to my noble friend Lord Arbuthnot, who has been...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc406-8
House
House of Lords

I know my noble friend the Minister does not want to comment on the particular case of Lee Castleton, but the point I was making about him was there were £325,000 of court costs. First, normally when you win you do not pay costs. The effect of saying that he...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c409
House
House of Lords

I commend my colleague the Postal Minister Mr Hollinrake for pushing through hard on the £600,000 because it is not for us to judge what any individual has lost; it is up to that individual claimant to make the decision about whether they want to go through the due legal...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c409
House
House of Lords

I would not want anyone to be confused in an already confusing situation. The £600,000 is not actually relevant to Lee Castleton because it is a sum that applies only to those who have overturned convictions. Lee Castleton was sued rather than prosecuted. I am sure he will get a...

Member
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 c409
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for that clarification.

Moving onto another theme, there has obviously been a lot of comment on Fujitsu and we have all been horrified by the extent of what would appear to be its collusion in the matter. Again, we have to be very careful here to...

Member
Lord Offord of Garvel (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 January 2024
Reference
835 cc409-410
House
House of Lords