Skip to main content

1-5 of 5 results for subject:Subscriptions

Member X
David Anderson

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Anderson, David (5)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My hon. Friend is making a strong case. From his years of experience in the trade union movement, what does he think the change to the political funding relationship with the Labour party will do to help the people the Conservative party says the Bill is about—the people who want...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2015
Reference
599 c836
House
House of Commons

I am proud and delighted to point Members to my declaration of interests. I joined the National Union of Mineworkers on 3 April 1969. Since then I have been a branch, regional and national trade union representative, president of the biggest trade union in Britain and a member of the...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2015
Reference
599 cc844-5
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving way. He is being his normal, generous self. In his two jobs, how many people in Uxbridge did not vote for him and how many in London did not vote for him? How can he condemn anybody else?

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2015
Reference
599 c861
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend recall that throughout the 1980s the working people of this country were lectured about giving managers the right to manage? Management in this country has agreed with trade unions at a local level who should have facility time and what they should do with it. Why...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2015
Reference
599 c778
House
House of Commons

I have seriously tried to understand the rationale for what the Minister has announced. It appears that the management were not controlling the check-off arrangements properly, because the unions would have paid the costs willingly, but those costs were not paid. It also appears that the management could have monitored...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2015
Reference
594 c171
House
House of Commons