Skip to main content

1-20 of 90 results for subject:Discipline

Member X
Earl Attlee

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Attlee, Earl (90)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I was not going to intervene, but the noble Lord, Lord Empey, said something that worried me slightly. I think that annual renewal by order of the Armed Forces Act is an absolutely essential control on the operation of the Armed Forces and the Ministry of Defence.

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2016
Reference
771 c1532
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I share the concerns of the noble and gallant Lord, Lord Craig. I am particularly concerned about putting retired servicemen in the frame again after there has been a judicial inquiry. It might be that a subsequent judicial inquiry comes to a different conclusion, but once you have...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c149GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Earl Attlee

12: After Clause 14, insert the following new Clause—

“Operation of “pay as you dine” system

(1) Within 12 months of the coming into force of this Act, the Secretary of State shall lay a report before Parliament on the operation of the “pay as you dine” system of catering...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 cc153-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the past, servicepeople living in barracks or the equivalent were charged for their food whether they ate in or whether they ate out. It could be the case that they were taking most of their food outside the barracks. This caused some resentment and a new system...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c154GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the Minister and the Opposition Front Bench reply, the noble Baroness made a very important point about the ration packs, which was slightly outside the scope of my amendment, but I have spoken slightly outside the scope of other noble Lords’ amendments. One of the challenges of...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c155GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have contributed to this short debate. The thing that slightly worries me is that the Minister did not offer to give us any information from any reviews. He said that reviews had taken place, and presumably those review reports could...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c157GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that undertaking. The noble Lord, Lord Touhig, tempted me to table a suitable amendment relating to the Armed Forces covenant and the requirement to produce reports. My ration of unhelpful amendments is strictly limited, so I do not think I will be doing that. I...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c157GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, for raising the issue of inquests. He has raised some important issues.

For many years, I have not been able to give my counsel on this matter because sadly we were taking many casualties on operation and, therefore,...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 cc167-170GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope, talked about training fatalities. My view is that all training fatalities, wherever they arise, should be subject to an inquest. I think there is a far bigger problem with training accidents than with operational fatalities. Those occur where the enemy has...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c172GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the partial support from the noble Lord. I have read the Army’s casualty procedure and looked at the advice to the commanding

officer, and when I last looked at the document—I doubt it has changed that much—it said as little as possible. It certainly went nowhere...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 cc172-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the Minister’s response to my amendment. I have a wicked question to ask him, following the point made by the noble Lord, Lord West, about what happens if we start taking large numbers of casualties, especially if the circumstances of each casualty are different....

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c176GC
House
House of Lords

I do not really expect the Minister to give me a precise figure, but I am very grateful to him for saying that he will reflect on what I have suggested. I do not expect him to get particularly far, but I am grateful for his attitude to my speech.

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c177GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Earl Attlee

18: After Clause 14, insert the following new Clause—

“Guidance on definition of “on duty” for reservists

The Defence Council shall promulgate an instruction or notice giving clear guidance as to when a reservist is on duty and when he or she is not, and any such guidance must cover,...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c177GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendments 19 and 20. This group of amendments explores when a reservist and, in some cases, a regular is or is not on duty, is subject to military law and can be expected to be supported by the MoD. When the Minister has...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 cc177-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who contributed. The Minister gave me exactly the answer I would expect. The first part of his answer was particularly useful so I am grateful to him for that. I am a little surprised by the response of the noble Lord,...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c181GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Earl Attlee

20A: After Clause 14, insert the following new Clause—

“Career employment group

(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), no female member of the armed forces shall be allocated a “career employment group” whose primary role is to close with and then engage or destroy the enemy in close combat.

(2)...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c181GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a short probing amendment to explore where the Government are on the issue of allowing women to serve on the front line. I do not intend to return to it at a later stage.

There is a wide variety of important roles for women in our Armed...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 cc181-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I did touch on subsection (3), the purpose of which is to ensure that we do not prohibit females from being posted to Special Forces units. Perhaps that would not be suitable for the SAS or SBS but perhaps other roles could be caught by my amendment as...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c184GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my worry is that, if the Government decide that, yes, we can have females serve in the infantry, the fitness and strength standards

for a combat infantryman would have to be lowered. That would mean that we lower the capability of the infantry—they would not be as fit...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 c184GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have contributed to the debate. I am not surprised that the noble Lord, Lord Touhig, had a go at me. I went part of the way: I said that we could have women in the Royal Armoured Corps because there...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2016
Reference
769 cc187-8GC
House
House of Lords