Skip to main content

1-20 of 357 results for house:"House of Lords"

Member X
Lord Beecham
Session X
2012-13

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Beecham, Lord (357)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether the Department for Work and Pensions intends to advertise the availability to the public of short-term benefit advances to help bridge the period between making a new benefit claim and the first payment of that benefit, following the abolition of Social Fund crisis loans;...

Asked by
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2013
Reference
744 c441WA; HL6748
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what contributions they have made, or plan to make, to (1) the capital costs, and (2) the annual running costs, of each of the existing or proposed free schools in England.[HL6671]

Asked by
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2013
Reference
744 c463WA; HL6671
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what contributions they have made, or plan to make, to (1) the capital costs, and (2) the annual running costs, of each of the existing or proposed free schools in Newcastle upon Tyne.[HL6670]

Asked by
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c427WA; HL6670
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what is the Government’s estimate of the number of prisoners to whom the judgment in the European Court of Human Rights case of James, Wells and Lee v UK applies? Have the Government estimated the cost of providing sufficient resources to comply with the requirement to ensure that prisoners have an opportunity to progress and to be properly assessed for release on licence?

Asked by
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 April 2013
Reference
744 c1347
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister agree with the observation of the Master of the Rolls, Lord Dyson, that there is no principle more basic to our system of law than the maintenance of the rule of law itself and the constitutional protection afforded by judicial review? When will the Government publish their response to the consultation on their proposals, and can the Minister indicate whether the view of consultees that has emerged from the consultation on the question of shortening the time limits for procurement and planning cases has been noted?

Asked by
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 April 2013
Reference
744 c1349
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join others in welcoming the Government’s partial, if deathbed, conversion to doing something about these proposals. I certainly endorse many of the comments that have been made about the problems that remain apparently unresolved. I particularly join the noble Lord, Lord Deben, in strongly urging the Government...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
744 c1239
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am pleased to join my noble and learned friend Lady Scotland and the noble Baroness, Lady Grey-Thompson, in expressing concern and regret at the situation which potentially confronts so many people in both the categories to which these Motions refer. The Motion of the noble Baroness, Lady...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2013
Reference
744 cc1110-3
House
House of Lords

My suggestion was that a freephone system might be adopted. Have the Government considered that; if so, will they consider it again?

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2013
Reference
744 c1117
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this debate consists of two parts. The first is the regret Motion tabled by my noble friend Lord Bach, which deals with a particular decision. I do not want to say any more about that other than that I entirely support the magisterial rebuke that he administers not...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2013
Reference
744 cc1089-1092
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to speak to Amendment 6A as an amendment to Amendment 6.

During the Second Reading debate on the Bill I referred to the obvious difficulty that your Lordships faced in calibrating the balance between the two desiderata of justice and security. There were some then, as there...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 cc1023-8
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Beecham

6A: Line 2, at beginning insert “If the court considers that a fair determination of the proceedings is not possible by any other means,”

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c1054
House
House of Lords

My Lords, your Lordships will be at one with the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, in agreeing that it is the prime duty of

government to protect the national security. That is currently being achieved by a variety of means, including PII. It would continue to be...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c1054
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendments moved by the noble Lord, Lord Marks, and I am prepared to say at this stage that I will not be pressing my own amendment, which is on similar terms at least to the last amendment that the noble Lord has moved.

The noble Lord,...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2013
Reference
744 c1065
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I endorse what has been said by noble Lords, particularly the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd. We have here a situation that is uncomfortably analogous to that which applies to the Jobseekers (Back to Work Schemes) Bill, whereby these Commons amendments are, in effect, being treated as...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2013
Reference
744 c807
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will confine myself to two topics. Taken in reverse order of importance, the first is what has become known in common parlance as “bash the burglar” legislation. The Minister emphasised the need for bringing this measure into force as quickly as possible. Given the paucity of cases...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2013
Reference
744 cc836-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join the noble Baroness in welcoming the Government’s moves to tighten up the arrangements for bailiffs. Like her, however, I regret that they have failed to take the ultimate step of establishing a clear and relatively straightforward regulatory system. I am slightly puzzled by some aspects of...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2013
Reference
744 cc843-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Minister ensure that in addition to being environmentally sustainable, new prisons are located in places that are not too far removed from the places whence the prisoners have come and where they might find jobs after their release?

Asked by
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2013
Reference
744 c588
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will take steps to end the routine strip-searching of children in custodial institutions; and, if so, what steps.[HL5901]

Asked by
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 2013
Reference
744 c126WA; HL5901
House
House of Lords

My Lords, yesterday in this Committee we debated a report from the noble Lord, Lord Goodlad, in relation to the Government’s procedures for consultation. Considerable concern was expressed by the committee that he chairs, shared by those of us who spoke in the debate, who were either members of the...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2013
Reference
744 c80GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will. I was making the point that this case exemplified the arguments that are being made about the Government’s defective consultation procedure, but that is a preliminary point and does not go to the substance of the matter, and I do not expect the Minister to accept...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2013
Reference
744 cc80-1GC
House
House of Lords