Skip to main content

1-20 of 180 results for subject:Security

Member X
Lord Callanan

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Callanan, Lord (180)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords private notice question on what recent discussions they have had, if any, with (1) the Government of Argentina and (2) the Government of the United States pertaining to the future of the Falkland Islands; and what steps they are taking to ensure the security of those islands.

Lead member
Lord Callanan
Answering member
Baroness Winterton of Doncaster
Department
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Private notice questions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 cc443-7
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for her reply and, indeed, welcome her to the Dispatch Box and her new job. I look forward to many happy exchanges with her in the future.

The Falkland Islands are British. We fought to defend them in 1982 and there should be no doubt of...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 September 2026
Reference
859 c444
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the importance of free and fair presidential elections in Nigeria in 2027 to (1) Nigeria's democratic stability, (2) regional security in West Africa, and (3) the UK's strategic and economic interests; and what steps they are taking with the government...

Asked by
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 March 2026
Reference
HL15466
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we begin our proceedings on Report, let me reiterate our view, as the Official Opposition, that the treaty that the Government have agreed with Mauritius puts the interests of the British people last. It is an abject surrender that we would never have agreed to. It was...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 cc961-957
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Callanan

2: Clause 1, page 1, line 7, at end insert

“, subject to subsection (2A).

(2A) Section 4 comes into force only when the Secretary of State has undertaken a consultation of the Chagossian community and laid a report of that consultation before both Houses of Parliament.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 cc963-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, throughout our debates on the Bill, we have heard time and again from noble Lords across your Lordships’ House that the Chagossian people have not been properly consulted by the Government. That is a view with which I heartily agree. They should be formally consulted on the whole...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 cc964-970
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will briefly move Amendment 3 in my name. I will also speak about the other amendments in my name in this group, but I will not seek to pre-empt the arguments of the noble Lord, Lord Faulks, when he gets around to proposing his amendments.

The ocean around...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 c996
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister’s remark to the noble Baroness, Lady Cash, was a little uncalled for.

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 c1003
House
House of Lords

The Minister may say that she was joking, but it was not a very good joke.

I thank all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate. In Committee, noble Lords across the Chamber set out their profound concerns about the practical ability of the Mauritian Government to deliver on their...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 c1003
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Callanan

7: Clause 1, page 1, line 7, at end insert

“, subject to subsection (2A).

(2A) Sections 2 to 4 of this Act come into force only when the duties outlined in section (Cost of the Treaty) have been discharged.”

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 c1003
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had lengthy debates on the cost of the treaty. The Government have consistently told us that their estimates tell us that the treaty will cost only £3.4 billion, with payments averaging £101 million per annum over the 99-year life of the treaty. We fundamentally disagree with...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1003-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been brief but fruitful debate and I am grateful to all who have contributed. I am particularly grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Purvis of Tweed, for his Amendment 50, which expresses our shared concerns about the unacceptable uncertainty over the costs of the commitments made...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 c1007
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Callanan

8: Clause 1, page 1, line 7, at end insert

“, subject to subsection (2A).

(2A) Sections 2 to 4 of this Act come into force only when the Secretary of State has published a statement setting out that the Secretary of State is satisfied that—

(a) the government of Mauritius...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1008-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment seeks to require the Government to publish a statement stating that they are satisfied that the state of Mauritius is not unduly influenced by hostile state actors and that those actors will not interfere with the operation of the military base. In our increasingly unstable world,...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 c1009
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for his comprehensive response. I know that my noble friend Lady Goldie would like to thank him for agreeing to write. We await this letter with interest. He has tremendous respect from across the House for the view he takes on defence; I...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 c1017
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the argument that the treaty was necessary because of the advisory judgment of international courts is something that we have debated at length. But, as my noble friend Lord Lilley has consistently demonstrated, the reality is that the Government had a political choice and they could have not...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 c1019
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend Lord Lansley for the amendments in this group. Throughout the passage of the Bill, we have had some interesting debates on the future of the prerogative. The Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee has made its recommendations on this point, and I understand why my...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 c1028
House
House of Lords

I wish to test the opinion of the House.

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 c1031
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am pleased that the noble Lord, Lord Purvis, has chosen to re-table amendments on an inter-parliamentary committee to monitor and assess the implementation and operation of the treaty. We have been seriously concerned about the ongoing assessment of the success of the treaty, and this is just...

Member
Lord Callanan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 c1037
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage. Amendment 1 agreed to on division (132 to 124). Amendment 19 agreed to on division (210 to 131). Amendment 32 disagreed to on division (168 to 178). Amendment 33 agreed to. Amendment 47 agreed to on division (194 to 130). Amendment 50 agreed to on division (131...

Lead member
Lord Coaker; Baroness Chapman of Darlington
Answering member
Baroness Goldie; Lord Callanan
Department
Ministry of Defence; Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
5 January 2026
Reference
851 cc952-1040
House
House of Lords