Skip to main content

1-20 of 24 results for subject:Iraq

Member X
Lord Campbell of Alloway

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, on the simple question of ““when””, as it is apparent that these operations are going to continue for a considerable time, what can ““when”” mean?
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 March 2008
Reference
700 c445
House
House of Lords

My Lords, following the noble Lord, I wish to say that, across the House, this is assuredly not a political debate. It is a pleasure to be able to agree with everything that he said. Indeed, there was only one speech that I did not understand and with which I...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 January 2008
Reference
698 c372-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there was no reference in the gracious Speech to a Bill to ratify the EU treaty. I totally support what my noble friend Lord Howell of Guildford said about the Commonwealth and what the noble Lord, Lord Luce, has just said. I do not apologise to the House...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2007
Reference
696 c79-80
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is it not better to leave undiscussed arrangements for the retreat of our Armed Forces?
Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 November 2006
Reference
687 c103
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to say in the Chamber that there was a fear of a military cover-up by the chain of command is a very serious allegation. That was the mistaken basis on which resort was taken to have this matter tried at the Old Bailey.

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
681 c274
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it not now apparent that one and a half years’ delay was occasioned by the decision of the noble and learned Lord to ordain that this trial should ensue under the civil jurisdiction? Was not that decision taken on a wholly mistaken premise that the chain of command...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
681 c273
House
House of Lords

rose to call attention to the advice and guidance given to the Director of Army Legal Services and the Army Prosecuting Authority by the Attorney-General under his supervisory function; and to move for Papers. The noble Lord said: My Lords, this Motion affords, noble Lords may think, a much-needed opportunity for...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2006
Reference
678 c1264-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I saw the noble and learned Lord the Attorney-General smiling. If the noble Lord, Lord Corbett, would be good enough to look in Hansard at the debate that took place on 14 July 2005, he will see that it was made perfectly plain, long before I introduced this, that there is no criticism of the...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2006
Reference
678 c1281
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on a question of this sort, it is very important that no one should think that this is in any sense related to matters extraneous to justice. This was dealt with on 14 July. I made it perfectly plain that it was not suggested that, at the element on which it...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2006
Reference
678 c1281-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, very sincerely I thank all noble Lords who have contributed to this debate, which has been good-humoured and very constructive. Certain parts of the construction would not appeal to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Goldsmith, but one or two building blocks are left standing and there is one, of...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 February 2006
Reference
678 c1298-9
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the advice and guidance given to the Director of Army Legal Services and the Army Prosecuting Authority by the Attorney-General under his supervisory function. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Campbell of Alloway
Answering member
Lord Goldsmith
Department
Attorney General
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
16 February 2006
Reference
678 c1264-99
House
House of Lords

My Lords, like other noble Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Rodgers of Quarry Bank, for introducing the debate. I agree with everything that has been said by noble and learned Lords on both sides of the House. In particular, I agree that this is not an occasion to impugn the integrity of...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 December 2005
Reference
676 c1388-90
House
House of Lords

Why in the case of Trooper Williams resort was sought to the concurrent jurisdiction by the Director of Armed Legal Services, after the charge had been dismissed by the commanding officer on the Ministry of Defence Senior Legal Adviser Branch’s advice that there was no case to answer.

Asked by
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2005
Reference
1936; 675 c61WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken, in particular the noble and gallant Lords, without whose contribution the perspective could not have been put. The noble Lord, Lord Drayson, gave an inkling of an understanding, when he said that the Government had learnt a lesson. Fair enough,...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
673 c1264-5
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the case for upholding the integrity and legal authority of the armed forces chain of command. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Campbell of Alloway
Answering member
Lord Drayson
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
673 c1220-65
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can I ask the House’s permission to finish reading what is relevant to the other letter—one minute?

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
673 c1222
House
House of Lords

May I claim one minute to deal with the letter? I was given 15 minutes.

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
673 c1222
House
House of Lords

rose to call attention to the case for upholding the integrity and legal authority of the Armed Forces chain of command; and to move for Papers. The noble Lord said: My Lords, the object of this speech, devoid of political motivation, is to seek to   persuade the Government and the noble...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
673 c1220-22
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am obliged. On 31 March, the DALS wrote to the Attorney-General requesting in that letter a reference on whether to institute proceedings for murder or manslaughter. In that letter no reference whatever was made to the extraneous reason. All that there was was a series of prejudicial...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
673 c1222-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am allowed—

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2005
Reference
673 c1222
House
House of Lords