Skip to main content

1-20 of 46 results for subject:Injunctions

Member X
Alan Campbell

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Campbell, Alan (46)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Local authorities, licensing authorities and the police express an interest in using a full range of powers. The hon. Member for Hornchurch criticises the work that Home Office officials and the police do, day in day out, throughout the country in the areas worst affected by alcohol-related disorder, to decide...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c84-5
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman should talk to his Front-Bench team about that, because that is precisely what they are seeking to do—to introduce subjectivity, whereas currently, if one seeks to introduce a measure that has such an effect in an area, the need for it must be demonstrated in the...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c86
House
House of Commons

I give way one last time.

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c86
House
House of Commons

It is entirely up to local authorities. If they want to hold it in abeyance while they consider other powers and discuss them with licensed premises, that is entirely a matter for them. I should have thought, from the comments that the hon. Gentleman has made in these debates and...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c85-6
House
House of Commons

I apologise. Clearly I have not explained to the right hon. Gentleman exactly what I am saying. I am not saying that that is the only purpose of alcohol disorder zones. If anyone said, "We intend to set up an alcohol disorder zone because we believe it's necessary to deal...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c84
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for making that point, because progress is being made. One of the issues that is being addressed right across the country, particularly in crime and disorder partnerships and particularly where the Home Office and the police are working closely with local authorities and...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c82-3
House
House of Commons

There have been discussions precisely on that point to ensure that some of the criticisms about bureaucracy made earlier in the debate do not apply. Let me be frank: as the hon. Member for Hornchurch (James Brokenshire) said, local authorities are not seeking to stigmatise their area, and they are...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c83-4
House
House of Commons

This has been an informative, if short, debate, in which there has been some agreement and some disagreement about whether these proposals deserve the support of the House. First, may I pay tribute to the work of and comments made by my hon. Friend the Member for Stoke-on-Trent, South (Mr....

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c81-2
House
House of Commons

Let me say in response to the hon. Member for Chesterfield (Paul Holmes) that we had an extensive debate in Committee, and our proposals were subjected to extensive consultation. A variety of suggestions were made, including the banning of wheel-clamping. In Committee we discussed ticketing systems, and I made it...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c111-3
House
House of Commons

The amendments were supported by the Government in the other place and are the result of listening to the debates that have taken place in this House and in Committees of both Houses, including the Joint Committee on Human Rights and the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee. Over the...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c411
House
House of Commons

We have brought forward measures that were not only debated in Parliament, but subject to considerable debate outside Parliament. There has been a long consultation with the public on the measures, and over that time scale additional research has been undertaken, so we cannot be accused of seeking a blank...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c415-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 40.

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c411
House
House of Commons

By removing clause 27, I hope we are not sending out the message that the offence in question is not a serious matter. People should not assume that because we are not seeking to escalate the fine, this is not serious. The police have a range of powers and we...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c405-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 25.

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c400
House
House of Commons

The Government have made a number of amendments to the alcohol provisions in response to the concerns that were expressed in both this House and in the other place. Amendment 25 removes clause 27 because the current maximum fine has never been imposed. We therefore accept that the clause is...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c400
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the House, I would like to respond briefly to colleagues' comments. First, I share the view of my right hon. Friend the Member for Rotherham (Mr. MacShane) that this is an important measure, but it has been a learning experience for us all. Even today, we...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c399-400
House
House of Commons

Amendments 6 to 15 respond to the concerns raised during the debates in this House about the potential scope of clause 13. Broadly, the amendments mean that it will be an offence to pay for sex with someone who has been subject to exploitative conduct of a kind likely to...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c390
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, that this House agrees with Lords amendment 6.

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c390
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1397
House
House of Commons

I think that we have to take one step back from those circumstances. We heard in Committee, and in the evidence sessions, about men who had come forward to say that they believed that women had been trafficked, or were being controlled for gain. They had alerted the women about...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1409-10
House
House of Commons