Skip to main content

1-20 of 406 results for subject:Scotland

Member X
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell of Pittenweem, Lord (406)

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by the Minister for Science, Research and Innovation on 21 November (HCWS376), what proportion of the funding announced for the UK R&D sector they expect will be allocated to universities in Scotland; and what steps they are taking to ensure...

Asked by
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 December 2022
Reference
HL3964
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is Minister reinforced in his view that an independence referendum is not required by fact that the Lord Advocate —Scotland’s senior law officer—has ruled that an independence referendum would not be within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament?

Asked by
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 July 2022
Reference
823 c1963
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendment 3 and have added my name to it. I have the advantage of having heard the last two contributions to this debate, which is, to some extent, a rehearsal of that which we held in Committee. I will take issue with the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 April 2021
Reference
811 cc1193-4
House
House of Lords

I begin by saying to the noble Lord, Lord Moylan, that I spend a lot of my time defending the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and I fear that the task is made more difficult on an almost daily, or perhaps weekly, basis by the fact that...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
807 cc899-901
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am tempted to say: “Follow that!” The noble Lord has given us something that is not just elegant and eloquent but very firmly researched. To avoid the risk of being accused of being repetitive or even repetitious, I propose to adopt the contribution not only of the...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2020
Reference
805 c175GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the new farming environment there will be many challenges, which undoubtedly will affect some, if not all, of the four nations of the United Kingdom. In these circumstances, co-operation is not just desirable but necessary; that is why I support Amendment 66. Looking around us, we see...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2020
Reference
804 c1028
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there is no dispute that this legislation, in the form of a statutory instrument, should pass. What is more surprising, as has just been pointed out by the noble Lord, Lord McConnell, is that it has taken so long to come before us. I associate myself with his...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2020
Reference
803 cc1374-5
House
House of Lords
Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2020
Reference
801 c935
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can be very brief. The circumstances we are discussing are entirely of the Government’s making. They may now reflect on the fact that they opposed the amendment proposed by the noble Duke, the Duke of Wellington, which would have given them more flexibility in this matter. It...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2019
Reference
795 c512
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it would be a brave tribe that took on the noble Lord. The noble Baroness the Leader, in introducing the debate, made a point of saying that this was a technical Bill. However, she has since had the experience of listening to the forensic dissection of the Bill...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2018
Reference
788 cc1404-6
House
House of Lords

Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg; one Rees-Mogg is very much like another. Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg has threatened us, and my answer to these threats is this: I am not here to thwart the will of the House of Commons. Like the noble Lord who has just spoken, I spent 28 years at...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2018
Reference
788 c1406
House
House of Lords

Her Majesty's Government how many Army units are stationed in Scotland; and where those units are located.

Asked by
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 July 2017
Reference
HL866
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in view of the unexpected taciturnity of the noble Lord, Lord West, would the Minister care to hazard a guess as to the consequences for warship building on the Clyde in the event of independence?

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2017
Reference
779 c1749
House
House of Lords

The noble Earl is quite right to say that the Black Watch traditionally came from north of the Tay—and south, as well—because it has traditionally recruited in Angus, Perthshire and Fife. My question is whether any impact on Reserve units in all three services arises from the Statement he has...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2016
Reference
776 c948
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is always a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Radice, whose commitment to the European cause is long-standing and equivalent to that of any other. The temptation simply to say that I adopt the speeches of my noble and learned friend Lord Wallace and that of...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2016
Reference
773 cc1864-6
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether the Base Optimisation Programme in Scotland has been completed.

Asked by
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 April 2016
Reference
HL7405
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what progress has been made towards realising receipts through the disposal of high-value Ministry of Defence estate in Scotland since the 2011 Basing Review.

Asked by
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 April 2016
Reference
HL7545
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it may be stretching the tolerance of the House for a fifth Scottish lawyer to join in this discussion, so I will confine myself to two issues. The first is Pepper v Hart. It is well worth understanding just how limited the application of that doctrine may be....

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 March 2016
Reference
769 c2077
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have been provoked to make a contribution arising out of the nature of the debate. I hope it is not a question of piling Pelion upon Ossa for yet another lawyer to offer what may be an obstacle. The right of judicial review may apply in circumstances...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 February 2016
Reference
769 c651
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what recent discussions they have had with the Scottish Government about the future electrification of the East Coast Main Line between Edinburgh and Aberdeen.

Asked by
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2016
Reference
HL5567
House
House of Lords