Skip to main content

1-20 of 39 results for subject:Trident

Member X
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell of Pittenweem, Lord (39)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the resilience of the UK nuclear deterrent, particularly in relation to cyber threats.

Asked by
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 May 2020
Reference
HL3947
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what progress has been made on the programme to replace the UK nuclear deterrent.

Asked by
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 2018
Reference
HL4459
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Jowell, on her maiden speech. I see that she is no longer in her place, but outside the protocols and confines of the Chamber,

I am very glad to acknowledge her as a close friend. In particular, I congratulate her yet again...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2016
Reference
773 cc187-9
House
House of Lords

In assessing the contribution of President Obama to this debate, will my right hon. Friend take into account the fact that the United States is intending to reduce its fleet of submarines carrying Trident missiles from 18 to 12,

and that the Berlin speech was the second time that President...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
566 c1223
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right that not all parties have been entirely consistent on this matter, but may I remind him that, prior to the 1992 election, the Labour party refused to commit to a fourth submarine, but suggested that one way of maintaining employment at Barrow-in-Furness would be to...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
566 c1228
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
566 c1229
House
House of Commons

This is a serious subject.

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2013
Reference
566 c1233
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman knows that my views are rather different from his, but I applaud his call for an open debate. On whether the funding should come from the defence budget as presently constituted or from some other source in Government, which does he believe to be the correct...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2010
Reference
515 c1047
House
House of Commons

I apologise to the House and to the Chairman of the Select Committee on Defence for not being present when the debate began. I was taken aback by the speed with which the previous business was completed. I hope that I do not sound too censorious when I say that...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2010
Reference
515 c1059
House
House of Commons

We must agree about that. That takes me to the points that the Chairman of the Defence Committee made with great directness. I think that I am the last member of the 1997 Defence Committee still to be in the House. As the right hon. Member for North East Hampshire...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2010
Reference
515 c1060-1
House
House of Commons

I hope that the hon. Gentleman will excuse me if I make a little progress first. I listened to my hon. Friend the Minister for the Armed Forces, who, with characteristic elegance, endeavoured to say that it was simply a matter of accounting. It is not a matter of accounting...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 September 2010
Reference
515 c1059
House
House of Commons

Indeed. During earlier exchanges, the thought occurred to me that, if there were any Treasury Ministers looking in on the debate, they certainly were not getting any encouragement about a willingness on the part of anyone in any part of the House to give up any capability or programme, or...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
512 c69
House
House of Commons

The defence review inevitably involves, as we have heard this afternoon, the consideration of abstracts and concepts, but the 300th death in Afghanistan is eloquent reality. As the shadow Defence Secretary indicated a moment ago, for every one of those people, 300 families are in mourning. We have a brief...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
512 c68-9
House
House of Commons

It is all a question of flexibility and adaptability; the hon. Lady will find that in the Green Paper. Take, for example, Afghanistan. We enjoy aerial supremacy there. There is no challenge in the air. That has been enormously important in the provision of close air support or interdiction, in...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
512 c70-1
House
House of Commons

No, I will not, because I will deal with the hon. Gentleman in a moment. The central question is: what role do we want Britain to play, and how much, as a nation, are we prepared to pay for that? On this occasion, the question is: how much can the...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
512 c69-70
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State began this passage of his speech by talking about returning to first principles. That allows me to take up an issue that he dealt with a moment or two ago, which is this: in determining the structure of our armed forces, in determining the location of...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
512 c55
House
House of Commons

Happily I am not paying for it.

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 June 2010
Reference
512 c126
House
House of Commons

I am sure that my hon. Friend has not forgotten the important issue of continuous at-sea deterrence and whether four submarines are necessary. Has he noticed that the Prime Minister has floated the idea of having three instead? That rather suggests that the unqualified enthusiasm for the project on the...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c682
House
House of Commons

Perhaps I can reverse the usual circumstances and say that I will write to the Minister.

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c44
House
House of Commons

My constituents, particularly those who live close to RAF Leuchars, understand well and truly that the Eurofighter Typhoon is a new fighter aircraft. They are particularly pleased that the Government have yet again committed themselves to the deployment of three squadrons to replace the two squadrons of Tornado that are...

Member
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c44
House
House of Commons