Skip to main content

1-20 of 72 results for house:"House of Lords"

Member X
Lord Campbell-Savours
Subject X
Candidates

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell-Savours, Lord (72)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Candidates (72)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, for my contribution, I wish to place on record a statement by Councillor Lisa Hinton, deputy leader of Cumbria—one of Cumbria’s finest councillors—on the scale of abuse that she has been receiving:

“The abuse I receive online is not abstract—it is personal, relentless, and at times shocking. I have...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2026
Reference
856 c36GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the noble Lord to his place. I have watched him on the Back Benches over a number of years and wondered when his day would come; it has finally come and I congratulate him.

Article 2(3) of the order

“adds to that list of matters reasonably incurred expenditure...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2020
Reference
802 c265
House
House of Lords

Her Majesty's Government what evidence they will require of disability of persons standing as Police and Crime Commissioners who have disability-related expenses which are not to be included under rules governing candidate spending limits in their proposed secondary legislation.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 February 2020
Reference
HL623
House
House of Lords

I will be very brief, so do not worry. Paragraph 14.3 of the Explanatory Memorandum refers to the EnAble Fund for Elected Office having,

“robust checks and balances in place to ensure that grants are allocated to eligible applicants”.

It then sets out the process to ensure that happens, because, obviously, public...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2019
Reference
795 cc2002-3
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Baroness accept that it is extremely difficult to prove that a person is not capable in many circumstances?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2010
Reference
716 c1426
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I oppose the amendment, which I regard more as a probing amendment at this stage, and support the review. While I would not wish to appear reactionary, I wish to comment on the practical difficulties that should be firmly considered in the review. I recall debates on these...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2010
Reference
716 c1423-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hesitate to dissent from a view expressed by the noble Lord, Lord Neill of Bladen, but I would say the following to him on the question of state funding. If you put state funding directly to the British people, as against a system that in part almost...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2009
Reference
711 c1074-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to speak on this amendment, because I think it is an important issue. The reality is that we were in Committee prior to the last round of elections. It seems to me that this is an escalating level of abuse: if we allow it to develop...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2009
Reference
711 c1120
House
House of Lords

Communications.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2009
Reference
711 c1080
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, will know that unfortunately I dissent from the position that he has taken. I ask him to forgive me because we work together very well in a number of areas of the Bill. I did not move my amendment because I wanted to...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2009
Reference
711 c1112-3
House
House of Lords

But the noble Lord has suggested it. He has made an accusation that we wish to defer the measure for electoral considerations. He should spell out exactly what he means, because it brings me to the heart of my case. He should not duck the question that I am asking.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
710 c388GC
House
House of Lords

I know that the noble Lord is not doing that, but others have. Something else came out when I looked into this. I looked into the famous "brown book", where all the election results of Members of Parliament are, and I looked up the Northern Ireland seats. Something struck me...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
710 c410GC
House
House of Lords

Does that not completely misunderstand the nature of the debate that is going on in these communities? In the areas where these problems have arisen over ethnic minority, basically, vote-rigging, it dominates the local press. People everywhere say, "What are we going to do about it?". They do not say,...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
710 c413GC
House
House of Lords

I do not expect my noble friend to answer directly now my two questions. Is it true that EROs are paid on the numbers of persons registered? If so, will that arise under this new arrangement? In other words, are they paid on the numbers that they manage and the...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
710 c415GC
House
House of Lords

My noble friend said that confusion might be caused. Would that be because some people might find themselves removed from the electoral register? In what circumstances would that happen?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
710 c412GC
House
House of Lords

I think that the noble Lord has a case. However, if an electoral registration officer within the local authority is dissatisfied with the response of the local authority, and he or she maintains that there is a problem with corruption of the electoral system, they can go to the Electoral...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
710 c396-9GC
House
House of Lords

I am glad the noble Lord has raised that valid point because it draws further attention to the invalidity of the statistics that were published on those three authorities. However, 439th, Belfast; 438th, Camden in London, which has the same characteristic foreign population; 437th, Antrim; 436th, Limavady in Northern Ireland—they...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
710 c393-4GC
House
House of Lords

On that matter, no one has given us those assurances. The official Opposition have not said that they are prepared to ring-fence those resources, which is absolutely critical. If they are not ring-fenced, they will be absorbed elsewhere and there will be cuts in budgets.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
710 c407GC
House
House of Lords

The problem essentially, as the noble Lord, Lord Henley, said, is fraud in the postal vote system. We are introducing a system of national rollout to deal with a problem of fraud which exists in very few parts of the country. The most recent case, if I remember rightly, was...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
710 c395-6GC
House
House of Lords

I cannot understand why the noble Lord wants to publish a Member’s address but not their source of employment.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2009
Reference
710 c427GC
House
House of Lords