Skip to main content

1-20 of 37 results for subject:"Climate Change Committee"

Member X
Lord Campbell-Savours

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell-Savours, Lord (37)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

moved Amendment No. 133: 133: Schedule 1, page 40, line 38, at end insert ““apart from the taking of decisions on behalf of the Committee on Climate Change”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I shall be very brief. The Bill states: "““The Committee may authorise a sub-committee, member or...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2008
Reference
699 c1449
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment was essentially a probing one to establish whether the Government had any concerns about how the committee would carry out its functions. My noble friend said that it is unlikely that the committee would delegate a core function. The question is whether that is sufficient to...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2008
Reference
699 c1451
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am indebted to my noble friend for his comprehensive response. I am sure that it will be pored over by those in the other place who will want to consider this issue further on the back of amendments moved there. I recognise what my noble friend said...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2008
Reference
699 c1461-2
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 139: 139: Clause 27, page 14, line 11, leave out ““advise the Secretary of State”” and insert ““decide upon”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I have kept my powder dry throughout the proceedings this evening so that I can concentrate on this amendment. My noble friend...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2008
Reference
699 c1454-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on that very matter, Parliament would have the right to the affirmative procedure, but it would not be in a position to consider and vote on the recommendation of the climate change committee if it wanted to support that as against the Government’s position.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2008
Reference
699 c1460
House
House of Lords

I briefly intervene only to follow up on a statement which I think my noble friend made at Second Reading when, on behalf of UNISON, which has taken a particular interest in the Bill, I suggested that there may be a role for trade unions in sub-committee work for the...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2008
Reference
697 c1110
House
House of Lords

I intervene briefly to ask my noble friend to reconsider some words he used in response to a previous amendment. I think I heard the noble Lord correctly when he talked about the ability of members of the committee to relate to a parliamentary committee, in the sense of being...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2008
Reference
697 c1112
House
House of Lords

I find this amendment rather curious. The noble Earl, Lord Cathcart, keeps drawing the long straw in moving all the amendments to which I object while his noble friend Lord Taylor of Holbeach moves the amendments that I support. I do not understand what is going on. However, if the...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2008
Reference
697 c1115
House
House of Lords

What about a Cross-Bencher in the House of Lords?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2008
Reference
697 c1115
House
House of Lords

I think I heard my noble friend say that, while Members of the House of Lords could be members of the committee, they would have to drop their political affiliation. They would not be able to remain members of a political party. Is that not what my noble friend said?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2008
Reference
697 c1116
House
House of Lords

What, in principle, is wrong with the requirement that the committee agrees a report on facts, findings and recommendations of the Committee on Climate Change?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2008
Reference
697 c1072
House
House of Lords

I support this amendment because it takes forward a discussion in which I have participated on two previous occasions. I refer to the whole question of the triangular balance between the three organisations to which the noble Lord, Lord Taylor of Holbeach, referred. At the weekend I watched our debates...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2008
Reference
697 c1064-6
House
House of Lords

Briefly, on the amendment that deals with a committee of the House of Commons, which committee is that? I have already identified six committees that would want to influence events, including the Transport Committee; the Trade and Industry Committee, with its responsibilities for energy; the Agriculture Committee; the Science and...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2008
Reference
697 c1079
House
House of Lords

The language used by the noble Lord is, if I may say so delicately, a little unreasonable. The Government have absolutely no intention whatever of stuffing this committee with anyone at all. I think he knows that.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2008
Reference
697 c1102
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may join this little party. I am sorry to ask my noble friend if he remembers that at Second Reading I raised the issue of tonnes. I have asked a lot of people and no one can give me a good explanation. Will he tell us whether, under...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2008
Reference
697 c859
House
House of Lords

I shall intervene briefly to speak tangentially to the amendment, as this offers me a peg to put a thought into my noble friend’s mind. A very interesting committee, the Quadripartite Committee, has been established in the other place. It draws on the Foreign Affairs Committee, the Defence Committee and...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
697 c773-4
House
House of Lords

I shall intervene only briefly on this amendment to return to the issue raised by the noble Lord, Lord Teverson, in his amendment. My noble friend intervened to draw the noble Lord’s attention to the existence of legislation on these matters, but what I want to emphasise about this amendment...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
697 c766
House
House of Lords

If you want to concentrate the committee’s mind on the need to act responsibly, you have to give it real power. The danger of a committee that does not feel that it has power is that it will act irresponsibly. It may well come up with conclusions that are simply...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
697 c746-8
House
House of Lords

I am concerned about this amendment; it worries me. The noble Earl will know that I have sought to be objective throughout the Bill’s proceedings, but he referred to ““regard to””. The amendment refers specifically to ““damage to””. I wonder whether the lawyers might make more than a few bob...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
697 c781-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I would like to intervene on my noble friend again on the word ““method””. They may well choose a method which is disputed by the Government. My noble friend says that there are international norms in the methods that might be used. The facts are that there are...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2008
Reference
697 c795
House
House of Lords