Skip to main content

1-20 of 153 results for subject:Security

Member X
Lord Campbell-Savours

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell-Savours, Lord (153)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, for my contribution, I wish to place on record a statement by Councillor Lisa Hinton, deputy leader of Cumbria—one of Cumbria’s finest councillors—on the scale of abuse that she has been receiving:

“The abuse I receive online is not abstract—it is personal, relentless, and at times shocking. I have...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 June 2026
Reference
856 c36GC
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what discussions they have had with the government of Ukraine about proposals for the United Kingdom to provide a security guarantee to that country.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
5 June 2025
Reference
846 cc842-5
House
House of Lords

While recognising the sheer bravado of those who executed Operation Spider Web, we have to accept that action has undermined Trump’s wider initiative, jeopardised his offer on the provision of security guarantees and hardened Russia’s attitude to conflict resolution. How can we ever secure a settlement and avoid substantial defence costs being imposed on European taxpayers if Zelensky is allowed to run amok with unilateral actions, thereby scuppering any prospect of an early settlement? With our long experience in diplomacy, why can we not think outside the box and engage with Trump’s people in discussions with Russia over measures to end this war? We cannot rely on Zelensky—he is out of control.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
5 June 2025
Reference
846 c842
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with undersea internet cable interference presenting only the latest challenge to security, along with threats to energy supply, banking, telecommunications, shipping and other potential use of viruses, should traditional defence chief responses, based on naval and military interventions, remain the main strategies in response? Should we not be reprofiling our expenditure towards nuclear deployments, defence satellite communications, selective sanctions enforcement, political exchange through dialogue and old-fashioned negotiations in conflict zones? The military option, costing billions in Ukraine, has hardly been a success.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 2025
Reference
842 c1256
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have heard a very powerful case from the previous speaker. I see no reason for me to detain the House unreasonably and will speak briefly, principally to Amendment 15. My concerns in Committee centred on what I saw as the need to isolate potentially irresponsible non-commercial users...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2021
Reference
809 cc1333-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to speak briefly on Part 3 of the Bill, entitled “Unmanned Aircraft”.

I understand that the Bill makes new provisions

“for constables to allow them to better enforce UA provisions in the ANO 2016”

and includes

“powers to require an unmanned aircraft to be grounded, powers to stop and search...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2020
Reference
801 c1287
House
House of Lords

On confiscation, will the Minister discuss it with her officials so that we are informed prior to Committee?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2020
Reference
801 c1295
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is my 12th intervention in the Brexit debate and since the day of the referendum I have argued a consistent case in this Chamber. I was on the doorstep and worked for Common Market entry in the 1970s campaign. I have supported the institutional changes brought about...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 January 2019
Reference
794 cc2303-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it not strangely ironic that we can send a man to the moon and around the moon and we can send starships into outer galaxies but we cannot knock out a little bit of equipment not much bigger than a football which is run by four propellers?...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2108
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I go back to the question of netting. I cannot see the point in an exclusion zone being widened if the resources are not there to enforce it. We know that these zones are already being breached, as was shown in this latest incident. There are airport workers...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2111
House
House of Lords

The drone’s flight was some 14 minutes. I understand that the maximum speed of these drones is about 50 miles per hour; helicopters can travel at 200 miles per hour, so what was the problem? I still think that the Minister is not getting the right answers from her officials.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 January 2019
Reference
794 c2112
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord’s amendment does not refer to what he described in his speech as the “other uses”. Of course, it is the other uses that make this proposition more saleable. The amendment in its current form, as I read it, would require a national database to be...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2018
Reference
793 c1747
House
House of Lords

The Minister referred to some terror attacks early on in his contribution. Would he accept that, if the United States Government had held DNA material at the time of 9/11, it would have been flagged up when those criminals embarked on the planes, which led to the disaster? If it...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2018
Reference
793 c1748
House
House of Lords

I understand that two of the terrorists were known to the American authorities: at the time they were identified following the incidents.

6.45 pm

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2018
Reference
793 c1749
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does not the chaos and division preceding the publication of this White Paper point once again to the approach that I have argued for in this House over the last two years? The people, by majority, voted leave because a majority of them wanted reform of free movement...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 July 2018
Reference
792 c1004
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister will recall a debate before Christmas in which his attention was drawn to the availability of drone-jamming signal equipment which could be used to an operational distance of 2,000 feet. It would be avoided by drone users because they would be likely to lose their drones. Why cannot we order and use this equipment to cover our airports?

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 2017
Reference
779 c709
House
House of Lords

Does this Question not take us straight back to the issue of authenticity of information in national identity documentation? Do Ministers realise that once an amateur takes a photograph, we could end up with civil servants arguing about whether that photograph is an exact image, whether it is dark, whether it was taken at the right angle, and whether it presents an image of the quality necessary to be put into an official document, with the result that they may end up having to return it to the sender for the sender to resubmit it? Is that not a waste of Civil Service time? It will cost the state money.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 January 2017
Reference
778 c210
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord did not address the issue of forensics that was raised by my noble friend directly. The subtext to his Statement is that the evidence of a device on board is not forensic; otherwise, the Government would probably have placed the information in the public domain....

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 November 2015
Reference
765 c1807
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the event of the Italian authorities giving temporary residency to boat people coming in from north Africa and landing on Italian shores, what would the position be at Calais? Would be we able turn those people back?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 June 2015
Reference
762 c1594
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chairman of Committees what information has been made available to members regarding the purpose of the visitor QR scanner and all associated equipment installed at Peers’ Entrance to the House of Lords.

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
18 July 2013
Reference
747 cc874-5
House
House of Lords