Skip to main content

1-20 of 23 results for subject:Shops

Member X
Lord Campbell-Savours

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Campbell-Savours, Lord (23)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, this is the 15th occasion since 9 March on which I have spoken on face masks, and I do not want to repeat much of what I have said in the past. We have made some gains over recent months, and I sense that the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2020
Reference
806 cc911-2
House
House of Lords

[Inaudible.]—but on four separate occasions, on 8, 24 and 29 July, and again on 14 September, I raised the issue of valves on masks. I have argued consistently throughout that the only people who should wear valve masks are medics working in a clinical setting. Therefore, for the fifth time...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 September 2020
Reference
805 cc1575-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank Ministers for the progress to date on masks, which are tangential to these regs. Last week, I gave notice of an Oral Question on masks. Unfortunately, another Minister was unable to respond, so I ask again: can the Minister rule out N95s and other valved masks,...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2020
Reference
804 c2486
House
House of Lords

My issue with these regulations is the policy on masks. Under the heading “Restrictions on movement”, Regulation 6 states that

“no person may leave the place where they are living without reasonable excuse”.

I propose that when the Government next review these regulations, they should add the following words: “Where a person...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2020
Reference
803 cc607-8
House
House of Lords

The questioner specifically asked about a turnover tax on online trading. What is the Government’s response to that suggestion?

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
10 May 2016
Reference
771 c1642
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chairman of Committees what was the total net cost of House of Lords catering and retail services in (1) 2009–10, (2) 2010–11, and (3) 2011–12; and what is that sum as a proportion of the resource budget of the House of Lords.[HL4529]

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 January 2013
Reference
742 c277WA; HL4529
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chairman of Committees what are the end of year House of Lords catering and retail services outturn figures on (1) turnover, (2) profit, and (3) cost of subsidy, for (a) the Peers' Dining Room, (b) the Home Room, (c) the River Restaurant, (d) the Bishops' Bar, (e)...

Asked by
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 January 2013
Reference
742 c277WA; HL4532
House
House of Lords

I shall be very brief. If a dog owner needs a licence, I cannot see why a retail tobacconist should not have one. I shall make one comment in one sentence—

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2009
Reference
708 c454GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is pulling everybody’s leg.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2009
Reference
708 c465GC
House
House of Lords

Can we establish that the clause does not say "have to", but "may", following consultation?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2009
Reference
708 c446GC
House
House of Lords

We are really out of knockabout territory on this issue. In my view, this is a very serious amendment because it requires greater transparency. I congratulate the noble Lord. I had originally intended to table something similar on Report, and I am pleased that he has helped us with his...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2009
Reference
708 c486GC
House
House of Lords

I think this is a cracking amendment. I hope that those who tabled it will move it on the Floor of the House on Report so the House has the opportunity to vote on it. This should be in the legislation. I am convinced it would have the support of...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2009
Reference
708 c443-4GC
House
House of Lords

Yes, selling alcohol. My main point is that a single-coloured pack and a licensing system would cut back on smuggled products being sold in retail shops in the United Kingdom. Could my noble friend comment on that proposition?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2009
Reference
708 c455GC
House
House of Lords

My adviser has corrected my statement, which was wrong. But I am sure that there is something for which we need a licence that is quite mundane.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2009
Reference
708 c455GC
House
House of Lords

I shall when I have finished the sentence. A single-coloured pack for all tobacco manufacturers within a licensing system would stop the sale of smuggled products in retail shops.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2009
Reference
708 c454GC
House
House of Lords

At the same time, they usually had a function going on somewhere in the Palace of Westminster to help people along with a drink or two.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2009
Reference
708 c461GC
House
House of Lords

I cannot understand what my noble friend means by "under review". Surely, if proposed new subsection (2A) were inserted into the law, a person would know they were committing an offence if they walked into a shop and attempted to buy tobacco on behalf of an individual under the age...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2009
Reference
708 c408GC
House
House of Lords

I wish I could convince my sister of that. She has had them and they have not worked. There are a lot of people out there who have found that they do not work. Maybe they do work but, again, where is the assessment; where is the leaflet which sets...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2009
Reference
708 c427GC
House
House of Lords

I shall speak to proposed new subsection (2) in Amendment 104 when we reach Amendment 105, because I think that there is a direct link between plain packaging and smuggling tobacco. I return to my experience in the early 1990s when I was trying to stop smoking. I wanted information...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2009
Reference
708 c426-7GC
House
House of Lords

I want to argue a very different case, which has little to do with children and a lot more to do with adults and vending machines. I had my last cigarette 24 hours before I went into Saint Bartholomew's Hospital in London with a tumour on the lung in 1996....

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 March 2009
Reference
708 c414-5GC
House
House of Lords