Skip to main content

1-20 of 38 results for subject:Jobcentres

Member X
James Clappison

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Clappison, James (38)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what guidance is provided for jobseekers at Jobcentre Plus offices on the availability of computers for carrying out job searches.

Asked by
James Clappison (Conservative)
Answering body
Jobcentre Plus
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
508 c714-5W; 321642
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what jobcentres she has visited since her appointment.

Asked by
James Clappison (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 November 2009
Reference
501 c77-8W; 300300
House
House of Commons

I support a great deal of what the right hon. Gentleman is saying, but does he think that it would help the debate if we clarified that we are not necessarily talking about the unemployed? We are talking about people who are economically inactive, and have been on economically inactive...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c827
House
House of Commons

I have made it clear, I hope, that we will not support the proposals made by the hon. Member for Birmingham, Selly Oak (Lynne Jones), but Liberal Democrat Members' comments suggest that they might do so, which would add that to the already-long list of Liberal Democrat spending commitments. We...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c789-90
House
House of Commons

I give way to the hon. Gentleman, although I think that I know what he is going to say.

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c790
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Lady, although I do not agree with the substance of her amendments. I congratulate her on the elegant—I mean eloquent—way in which she presented her case. Although she was eloquent, as well as elegant, I must advise my hon. Friends to vote...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c788-9
House
House of Commons

I was going to turn to that point, but as the hon. Gentleman is there already I will deal with it now. If he studies the Green Paper that we issued last January, he will see that it mentions the age limit of five and that there is no age...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c790-1
House
House of Commons

To be fair to the Government, they have said that they foresee that there will be discussions and interviews. Behind those interviews, however, there will be requirements and the possibility of sanctions and of directions from advisers to single parents. The Government have to face the fact that, under this...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c792
House
House of Commons

Such places may be available, but the Minister for Employment and Welfare Reform conceded in Committee that such places were not available throughout the whole country. The Government looked into the issue themselves and published a Green Paper, which I adverted to earlier following a helpful intervention. In that Green...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c792-3
House
House of Commons

Yes, I will. Perhaps the hon. Lady is going to tell us that they will not face such sanctions.

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c792
House
House of Commons

I give Ministers the credit of thinking that they want to listen to the debate. They may want to hear what I have to say; they may want to listen to what their hon. Friends say. What I am saying is that if the Government press ahead with this provision,...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2009
Reference
489 c793
House
House of Commons

Unemployment. Seventh Opposition Day debate (part 1). Main question negatived on division (161 votes to 349). Amendment agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness May of Maidenhead
Answering member
James Purnell
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Opposition days
Date
10 March 2009
Reference
489 c165-219
House
House of Commons

So the hon. Gentleman says, but one of Labour's key pledges was:""We will get 250,000 young unemployed off benefit and into work"." Today, as my hon. Friends have reminded the House, there are 140,000 more 16 to 24-year-olds unemployed than there were in 1997. That is the scale of the...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2009
Reference
489 c210-1
House
House of Commons

Yes. The Government have broken another promise. They said that they would ensure that the vacancies were advertised in the jobcentres, but they failed. I think that the Secretary of State would do better to keep quiet rather than intervening from a sedentary position. What he fails to face up...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2009
Reference
489 c211-2
House
House of Commons

This has been a good debate with thoughtful contributions that remind us how, in the words of my hon. Friend the Member for North-East Hertfordshire (Mr. Heald), unemployment is a searing experience for so many of our constituents, many of whom are experiencing it for the first time, or for...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2009
Reference
489 c209-10
House
House of Commons

I will not give way to the hon. Gentleman, because he has not been present throughout the debate. The final line of the Government amendment states, somewhat unbelievably, that the House""further believes that the Government should increase the support offered to people trapped on benefits by previous recessions."" So now...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 March 2009
Reference
489 c210
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c253
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Lady. We also think that it is good for lone parents to work, and the evidence is that work is beneficial to them and to their children. However, there is a balance to be struck between the care of young children and the work of...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c265-6
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is making a considered and well informed speech, but he refers to that idea as a canard. The canard actually comes from the Government's own consultation paper, the back of which refers to charging interest on social fund recipients. It sets out the impact of that and...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c253
House
House of Commons

This has been a very good debate, with some powerful personal accounts, including the last two contributions. I do not have time to mention all the speeches made, but I commend my hon. Friend the Member for Bournemouth, West (Sir John Butterfill), who made a powerful speech on behalf of...

Member
James Clappison (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2009
Reference
487 c263-5
House
House of Commons