Skip to main content

1-18 of 18 results for member:"Lord Coaker"

Member X
Lord Coaker
Subject X
Public bodies

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Coaker, Lord (18)
More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to reduce duplication and simplify (1) management structures in the Ministry of Defence, and (2) the organisation of public bodies and agencies that work with the Ministry of Defence.

Asked by
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 July 2025
Reference
HL9498
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons amendments. Commons amendments 1 to 17 agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Answering member
Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
23 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1377-1383
House
House of Lords

My Lords, once again, I thank those in the intelligence community who defend our country. I thank all MPs and Peers from both Houses for their dedicated scrutiny of the Bill, which we fully support. As the noble Lord outlined, it is a good Bill that has been improved by...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1379-1380
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage. Amendment 1 disagreed to on division (201 to 227). Amendments 4, 8 to 14, 26, 32 to 34, 39, 41, 43, 44 and 46 agreed to. Bill, as amended, ordered to be printed (HL Bill 42).

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Notes
Scottish legislative consent sought.
Date
23 January 2024
Reference
835 cc681-732
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not have much to add to the debate. From these Benches, we fully support the amendments proposed by the noble Lord, Lord West, and the excellent way in which he presented them. They have the support of the whole ISC, which in this respect has done...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 January 2024
Reference
835 cc726-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his continued engagement with us on all aspects of this important Bill. I would be grateful if he could pass that on to his officials as well. I wish the noble Baroness, Lady Manningham-Buller, well with her knee, and I hope she will...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 January 2024
Reference
835 cc687-9
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for giving way, because this is an extremely important point. He mentioned with respect to my Amendment 5 that somebody will formally reach out. Does that mean that the Prime Minister will formally reach out to the ISC and meet with it, so that we get...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 January 2024
Reference
835 c691
House
House of Lords

Lords committee stage first day. Clauses 1 to 13 agreed to. Schedule agreed to. Clauses 14 to 19 agreed to. Clause 20, as amended, agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Sharpe of Epsom
Answering member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede; Lord Coaker
Department
Home Office
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Notes
Scottish legislative consent sought.
Date
11 December 2023
Reference
834 cc1724-1774
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Coaker

1: Clause 2, page 3, leave out lines 24 to 27 and insert—

“(b) the extent to which information contained within the personal data has been made public as a result of steps deliberately taken by the data subject;”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would ensure the definition of a low...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2023
Reference
834 c1725
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I get to the specifics of my Amendment 1, I will make some general remarks. I thank the Minister and all his officials for their very helpful briefing and the collaborative way in which they have approached the Bill. As he knows, we support the Bill, but...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2023
Reference
834 cc1725-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that was an extremely helpful response from the Minister and shows the importance of tabling probing amendment sometimes: to get things read into Hansard that can be referred to.

With respect to the point around children, I would be grateful for the letter to be made available to other...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 December 2023
Reference
834 cc1747-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Grantchester’s comments were memorable and moving. I associate myself with his tributes and praise to various elected representatives, the families of the victims and the supporters from all of Merseyside, both Liverpool and Everton and no doubt many others throughout the region. I thought...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 December 2023
Reference
834 cc1556-7
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government why they announced that they are no longer going to create a single enforcement body overseeing conditions in the labour market.

Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 January 2023
Reference
HL4710
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall start with my noble friend Lord Jones’s remarks. He mentioned the reserves and the covenant affecting military families. My son-in-law is an active member of 4 Mercian reserve. He was recently in eastern Europe and will be away again in a couple of weeks’ time. Given...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 cc204-5GC
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Goldie
Answering member
Lord Coaker
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
18 October 2022
Reference
824 cc199-210GC
House
House of Lords

That this House notes with great concern the high levels of income and particularly wealth inequality in our society; further notes the recommendation in the 2016 Concluding Observations of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights to bring into force the outstanding provisions of the Equality Act 2010;...

Primary sponsor
Baroness Harman (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
23 November 2017
Reference
591
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps for redress are available to people who believe they have suffered from an abuse of intrusive surveillance powers by (a) local authorities and (b) central Government-controlled bodies; and if she will make a statement.

Asked by
Bob Spink (UK Independence Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2008
Reference
480 c1282W;480 c1272W; 225224
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many cases involving alleged abuse of intrusive surveillance powers by (a) local councils and (b) central Government-controlled bodies were investigated by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal in each year since it was established; and if she will make a statement.

Asked by
Bob Spink (UK Independence Party)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2008
Reference
480 c1281-2W;480 c1271-2W; 225189
House
House of Commons