Skip to main content

1-20 of 20 results for subject:Trident

Member X
Lord Coaker

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Coaker, Lord (20)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House recognises the sacrifice made by the submariners of Her Majesty’s Royal Navy and the dedication of shipwrights and craftsmen across the United Kingdom in constructing and maintaining the Royal Navy submarines in which they serve; commemorates the fiftieth anniversary of UK continuous at-sea deterrence, known as Operation...

Primary sponsor
Lord Walney (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Early day motions
Date
10 April 2019
Reference
2290
House
House of Commons

Will the right hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c583
House
House of Commons

It is a privilege to follow the hon. Member for Tonbridge and Malling (Tom Tugendhat). I am proud to stand here as someone who upholds a position that the Labour party has always stood for—proud to recognise our international responsibilities and proud to recognise that a strong defence is essential...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 cc599-600
House
House of Commons

I am pleased that the hon. Gentleman has asked that question. Having set out the reason for the uncertainty of the future we face, I want in my remaining minutes to dispel some of the myths that are mentioned when nuclear weapons are debated. Nobody here believes that nuclear weapons...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c600
House
House of Commons

That is a legitimate point and we have to make a legitimate choice. I support the Government’s choice because in an uncertain world as we look forward, it is a price worth paying for the defence and security of our nation. The hon. Gentleman and I know each other, so...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 cc600-1
House
House of Commons

Of course I am aware of it. Is the hon. and learned Lady aware of the fact that NATO has something called the nuclear planning group, and that every single person in NATO has to be a member of that group and they have to agree to certain things, including...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c601
House
House of Commons

I cannot give way anymore.

Jobs are, of course, another crucial aspect. Tens of thousands of jobs across this country are dependent on the nuclear deterrent and the continuation of this programme. Although the continuation cannot be based solely on jobs, they are an important consideration—whether the jobs be in Scotland,...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
613 c601
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c103
House
House of Commons

The Defence Secretary read out our policy, and my hon. Friend the Member for Barrow and Furness (John Woodcock) reiterated it. Our policy is quite clear: we want a minimum independent credible

deterrent based on continuous at-sea deterrence, and of course we want to provide it in the most cost-effective...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c103
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for New Forest East (Dr Lewis) for the contribution he has made, and often makes, in his speeches on this issue in the House of Commons. I do not mean to question the other parts of his speech, but may I tell him that its...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c144
House
House of Commons

I will make some progress first. I have only just started my speech, so let me have a minute or two.

I am grateful for the opportunity to outline clearly our position on nuclear deterrence and multilateral disarmament. The Labour party is an internationalist, multilateralist party, and proud to be so....

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 cc144-5
House
House of Commons

All I can say is that I am espousing the UK position, and what I am saying is consistent with the leader of the Scottish Labour party. Clearly, there is much more to do. The non-proliferation treaty conference later this year will be a key moment for a future Labour...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c145
House
House of Commons

To try to be fair to the hon. Gentleman, this is about replacement and maintenance of our deterrent. He does not believe in us having a nuclear deterrent. Labour’s position is the policy I have espoused, which is that we must look at replacing our deterrent. He disagrees and that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c146
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman tempts me to respond. We will vote for the policy we believe in. That is the policy I am laying out before the House, and we will vote accordingly.

Multilateral disarmament works only if all parties feel more secure. Were the UK to abandon its nuclear deterrent on...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c146
House
House of Commons

I very much agree on the need for us to recognise our international obligations.

On the subject of NATO, I would like to return to a point that others have made. Is it not time for the Scottish Nationalists to be frank and open with us all? NATO is a nuclear...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 cc146-7
House
House of Commons

As I have said, the evidence before us is that the continuous at-sea deterrent requires the current posture. What we have said is that, as part of the strategic defence and security review, we will consider whether a continuous at-sea deterrent can be delivered in a more cost-effective way. That...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 cc147-8
House
House of Commons

We should not be playing party politics with an issue like this, but if we are, does the hon. Gentleman agree with the right hon. Member for North Somerset (Dr Fox), who said,

“At the moment the assessment is we need four…So at the moment the technology says four. That’s something...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 January 2015
Reference
591 c182
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps his Department takes to monitor the safety and performance of the UK's nuclear deterrent and weapons programme.

Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 November 2014
Reference
215481
House
House of Commons

I had to look twice at today’s date. Reading The Guardian this morning, I thought that it must be April the first. Apparently the Defence Secretary is the champion of the shipyards and the workers, the insider on shadow Cabinet discussions, and the man in the know on Labour party policy.

Labour’s position is in favour of the minimum credible independent continuous-at-sea deterrent, and I have told the Defence Secretary that directly and recently. Will he now tell the House why he is playing party politics with an issue of such national importance?

Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c17
House
House of Commons

Having been to Barrow after a few days in post to see the successor programme and having met Keep our Future Afloat and the trade unions regularly since then, my and our position is clear. Perhaps the Secretary of State is a little confused. Are these whispers he says he has heard about the Opposition in fact about those he serves alongside in government, namely the Liberal Democrats? Is it not his coalition partners, not Labour, where the opposition comes from when it comes to retaining a nuclear deterrent?

Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 February 2014
Reference
575 c17
House
House of Commons