Skip to main content

1-20 of 24 results for subject:Intimidation

Member X
Lord Cormack

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Cormack, Lord (24)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I am sure that we are all grateful to my noble friend for bringing his customary thoroughness to the answers he has just given. I declare an interest in that I led the last CPA delegation to Hong Kong before the handover, and two of my grandchildren were...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2023
Reference
831 c1953
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have often said in this House that the first question we should ask when confronted with a new Bill is: “Is this necessary?” This point was touched on by the noble Baroness, Lady Hoey, a few minutes ago. I do not believe that this Bill is necessary...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2023
Reference
827 cc520-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we need a little calm in this situation. I thought that the noble Lord, Lord Beith, made a very wise, temperate speech, and we would all benefit from reflecting upon what he said.

There is an extraordinary irony behind this. As this Bill goes through your Lordships’ House, we...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1309-1310
House
House of Lords

I am delighted to tell the noble Baroness what my opinion is. My opinion is based on real sadness that, since 1997, the other place has progressively ceased to be a House of scrutiny. MPs devoted just two hours to the Report stage of this Bill. What happened in 1997...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1310
House
House of Lords

They might have voted for all sorts of reasons. We have already heard that Stella Creasy refused vote for the Bill because it had gone wrong as far as she was concerned. Of course I will give way.

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1310
House
House of Lords

I was a constituency MP for 40 years, so I have a bit of knowledge of it. We must make sure we do not inadvertently criminalise large

numbers of people. As for the large majority in the other place, I have talked about the scrutiny and that is all entirely...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 cc1310-1
House
House of Lords

May I remind my noble friend that he and I cast many votes during the debates on Brexit, regardless of what the House of Commons was doing, because we thought we were right?

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 November 2022
Reference
825 c1314
House
House of Lords

Well, I am sure we are very grateful to the noble Baroness for that moving conclusion to her very interesting speech. Listening to every speech this afternoon, there has been one subject on which every Member has spoken and agreed: the excellence of the maiden speech of the noble Lord,...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 February 2022
Reference
819 cc277-8
House
House of Lords

I completely understand the general drift of the hon. Lady's argument and do not quarrel with it. However, I understand that the House of Lords will have two days for the Bill and we have only one. Surely the elected House should have at least as much time as the...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1288-9
House
House of Commons

May I infer from what my hon. and learned Friend says that there was an attempt to negotiate a better timetable through the usual channels, and that those negotiations failed?

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1292
House
House of Commons

I, too, was somewhat reassured by what the Minister said about the sunset clause. I was partly reassured by what I took to be an indication that there will be no pressure on the House when that major piece of legislation is introduced in the next parliamentary Session. She is...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1299
House
House of Commons

I shall not do that, Mr. Speaker, save to say that I accept what the hon. Member for East Antrim says. We are, indeed, discussing the timing, and although I accept the need for urgency and—unlike my right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Sleaford and North Hykeham—the need...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1299-300
House
House of Commons

Yes, but the circumstances were very different, as my right hon. and learned Friend knows far better than I do.

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1299
House
House of Commons

I understand the Minister’s sense of relief and delight at the announcement, but it is by their fruits that we shall know them. I hope that he will not allow himself to indulge in any false euphoria merely because certain people who have broken the law innumerable times in the...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 February 2007
Reference
456 c718
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman reaffirms his point. I hope that that message will go to Sinn Fein because it is the one vital step that must be taken before devolution can be restored in Northern Ireland. I do not agree with everything that the Democratic Unionist party or any other party...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c927-8
House
House of Commons

We will have to wait to see whether they will affect my constituency or not. I did not say that I supported the Bill unreservedly; the hon. Lady takes my words a step too far. I said that I was content to support it. I am particularly concerned about the...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c929
House
House of Commons

I will be rather briefer, I hope, than the hon. Member for Foyle (Mark Durkan), although of course he took several lengthy interventions. I give my broad support to the Bill, but as the Under-Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, the hon. Member for Wythenshawe and Sale, East (Paul Goggins),...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c926-7
House
House of Commons

Perhaps I could come to the right hon. Gentleman’s aid by saying that it was the unanimous, if reluctant, view of the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee that something like this was necessary.

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c898
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman must not go too far. The Committee was not unanimous in every particular, as I shall make plain in my speech, but it was unanimous on the general principle that there should be provision for non-jury trials, as it was on organised crime in its report...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c898
House
House of Commons

While I have sympathy with the point that the hon. Gentleman makes, the Government have now on three separate occasions scheduled Northern Ireland business to clash with the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, and we have had to abandon our sittings.

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2006
Reference
454 c913
House
House of Commons