1-4 of 4 results for subject:Forgery
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.191 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Forgery
- We searched for
- subject_t:Forgery OR subject_ses:91337
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
That this House condemns the reported activities of Mr Abdullah Azad of the Welfare Centre in Manchester as set out in The Observer of 22nd November, which alleges that Mr Azad offered to supply forged United Kingdom passports for the payment of a fee and urged persons whose immigration status was in question to apply for asylum, thereby lengthening the queue for legitimate applicants; believes in the absence of any indication from Mr Azad that he intends to sue for defamation, that the newspaper report is true; calls on the police to investigate the matter fully with a view to bringing charges; considers that immigration and asylum advisers and solicitors who act unlawfully should be brought to book; and urges the Government to take urgent action to regulate immigration advisers.
That this House condemns the reported activities of Mr Abdullah Azad of the Welfare Centre in Manchester as set out in The Observer of 22nd November, which alleges that Mr Azad offered to supply forged United Kingdom passports for the payment of a fee and urged persons whose immigration status...
That this House calls on the Government to restore confidence to shops and businesses which are refusing to accept ??50 and ??20 notes due to the flood of forgeries taking place in the United Kingdom, as the refusal to accept these legal notes is causing terrible embarrassment to customers.
That this House calls on the Government to restore confidence to shops and businesses which are refusing to accept ??50 and ??20 notes due to the flood of forgeries taking place in the United Kingdom, as the refusal to accept these legal notes is causing terrible embarrassment to customers.
That this House notes that following a detailed investigation by the honourable Member for Workington, fraudulent diplomas and documents issued by JHP have been identified; believes that this documentation forms only part of a large volume of similar material held by the company nationally; believes that a detailed enquiry into JHP operations will reveal, the extensive forgery of trainee and trainer signatures, the theft of public money, the submission of falsified documentation and attendance records to TEC officials, unreasonable pressure having been exerted on employees, the deliberate misleading of the national examination boards, the alteration of trainee work records prior to assessment and verification, the pursuit of training targets for the purpose of maximising profit, the use of questionable activities with regard to verification procedures, the creation of phantom trainees for the purpose of cheating the taxpayer, the generation of fictional trainee timesheets, the holding of award certification prior to the completion of training, and the premature departure of trainees in disgust over the quality of training; believes that JHP local, regional and national personnel have been made aware of these practices in internal reports and meetings; believes that the indifference of the company to such allegations, apart from the discreet termination of a few employee contracts, only serves to indicate how widespread has been the fraud; and expreses thanks to Cumbria TEC for being helpful and open during the course of the honourable Member for Workington's enquiry and for the recent work carried out on quality standards in relation to JHP.
That this House notes that following a detailed investigation by the honourable Member for Workington, fraudulent diplomas and documents issued by JHP have been identified; believes that this documentation forms only part of a large volume of similar material held by the company nationally; believes that a detailed enquiry into...
That this House calls for a full inquiry by the National Audit Office under section 9 of the National Audit Act 1938, and by the Runcorn-based Internal Audit Unit at the Employment Department into the activities of JHP Training Limited, of Foleshill, Coventry, associate company of Pitman Personnel and Pitman Sumlock; notes that JHP has a national network of 65 training centres; notes that in July 1993 JHP fraudulently misled the Pitman's Examination Institute into issuing an NVQ business administration level 2 diploma certificate number PE13046 in the name of Mr Gareth Marshall, a constituent of the honourable Member for Workington; notes that Mr Marshall, who never received the award, and who was never made aware of its existence, strongly objected to his name being used in the committing of this criminal offence; believes that the Pitman's Examination Institute is an innocent victim of this fraud carried out by senior JHP personnel; advises Martin Cross, the Chief Executive of the RSA examination board, that his organisation has also been used in similar circumstances by JHP; believes that such actions totally undermine the NVQ awards system in the United Kingdom; calls upon the PEI and RSA, in defence of their high reputations to consider bringing civil proceedings for damages against JHP and for the Crown Prosecution Service to prosecute those involved at the highest level under the criminal law; and notes that the papers in the possession of the honourable Member for Workington are available to the investigating bodies.
That this House calls for a full inquiry by the National Audit Office under section 9 of the National Audit Act 1938, and by the Runcorn-based Internal Audit Unit at the Employment Department into the activities of JHP Training Limited, of Foleshill, Coventry, associate company of Pitman Personnel and Pitman...