Skip to main content

1-20 of 63 results for subject:Iraq

Member X
Ian Davidson

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

rose—

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 September 2014
Reference
585 c1274
House
House of Commons

That this House is aware of the plight of the 3,000 residents of Camp Liberty in Iraq who have been promised United Nations protection but who instead regularly face violence, assaults, physical torture and intimidation; understands also that the Iraqi authority frequently denies relatives visas to visit their loved ones;...

Primary sponsor
Alan Meale (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
7 January 2014
Reference
912
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of the total cost to the public purse of UK military operations in Iraq since 2003; what factors he took into account in making this estimate; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 October 2010
Reference
14723; 515 c1316W
House
House of Commons

That this House recalls the near liquidation of a once strong and non-sectarian trade union movement by the dictatorial regime of Saddam Hussein; salutes those who have devoted themselves to rebuilding a labour movement in Iraq before and since his overthrow with important moral and material support from the Trades...

Primary sponsor
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
20 July 2010
Reference
559
House
House of Commons

That this House supports the work of the new and independent trade union movement in Iraq; deplores the barbaric terrorist attack on a textile factory in Hilla in May 2010 which killed 40 workers and injured dozens of other people; agrees with the Trades Union Congress that this is a...

Primary sponsor
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
9 June 2010
Reference
192
House
House of Commons

The former shadow Minister is speaking in a fascinating way about Afghanistan. However, now that he has the freedom of the Back Benches—and I congratulate on being prepared to lay down his official position for his allies—may I ask whether he still has the same view of aircraft carriers as...

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 May 2010
Reference
510 c211
House
House of Commons

That this House recognises the bravery, dedication and sacrifice of members of the armed forces in Afghanistan and Iraq; applauds the review and enhancement of the Armed Forces' Compensation Scheme; and calls on the Government to amend the qualifying date of 6 April 2005 to 1 January 2001, which marks...

Primary sponsor
Bob Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
25 May 2010
Reference
56
House
House of Commons

That this House recognises the bravery, dedication and sacrifice of members of the armed forces in Afghanistan and Iraq; applauds the recent review and enhancement of the Armed Forces' Compensation Scheme; and calls on the Government to amend the qualifying date of 6 April 2005 to 1 January 2001, which...

Primary sponsor
Bob Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
1022
House
House of Commons

That this House notes the deeply disturbing report of BBC correspondent John Simpson indicating the high numbers of children being born with serious defects in the Iraqi town of Fallujah; further notes that the report says that those born with congenital heart defects is 13 times the rate found in...

Primary sponsor
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
1020; 1020A1; 1020A2
House
House of Commons

Defence is one of the most important areas of politics, and it ought to be debated fiercely, so I am astonished that the Opposition seem to have run out of steam. There seems to be no passion, fire, drive or urge for government, and we are only—what?—two months away from...

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c702-3
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c664
House
House of Commons

May I go back to the point that the hon. Gentleman was making when I sought to intervene on him? He was speaking movingly about the shortfalls affecting the Navy. Is it true that the first act of a Conservative Government would be, as he said to the convenors of...

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c665
House
House of Commons

Surely my hon. Friend was wrong when he said that there was very little difference between the two sides on many defence issues, because we can clearly see that the carriers and the Royal Navy are safe with Labour and sunk with the Conservatives.

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c714
House
House of Commons

That was my next point, because I want to consider the Government's position. Unlike the Opposition, when we look to the crystal ball, with the Government we can read the book and see what they have done. If the Government intended to cancel the aircraft carriers, they would have done...

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c703
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister—that was very clear. Even the Liberals would agree that it was clear, because we find ourselves in agreement with them on this matter in seeking coalition support, and there is no point in trying to find arguments where none exist. We are therefore in a position...

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c703-4
House
House of Commons

Yes?

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c680
House
House of Commons

I thought that the hon. Gentleman was going to say more about the aircraft carriers. Does he agree with his colleague the hon. Member for North Devon (Nick Harvey), who, when he met the convenors of the shipyard unions last week, indicated that the aircraft carriers were safe with the...

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2010
Reference
506 c680
House
House of Commons

That is a hard question. I do not find it particularly surprising—it simply demonstrates the Liberal spokesman's confusion or possibly lack of local knowledge. The Conservatives have not said unequivocally that they would like the aircraft carriers. They have pushed the matter into the middle distance, presumably hoping that something...

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2009
Reference
497 c506-7
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman speaks of the excellence of the Royal Navy, and we must obviously consider its future. Would any future Conservative Government guarantee the contract to build two aircraft carriers—yes or no?

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2009
Reference
497 c481
House
House of Commons

Clarity in procurement is important. Can we be clear about what the Liberal Democrat policy is in terms of procuring two aircraft carriers? Are the Liberal Democrats in favour of that? I deserve an answer because I am the only person listening.

Member
Ian Davidson (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2009
Reference
497 c487
House
House of Commons