Skip to main content

1-20 of 129 results for subject:Protection

Member X
Lord De Mauley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
De Mauley, Lord (129)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I shall speak to Amendments 13 and 25 in this group. Amendment 13 seeks to introduce a provision for exemptions to public protection procedures under the Bill. While I fully support the legislation’s intent to enhance security and preparedness in the face of the ongoing terrorist threat, I...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2025
Reference
844 cc170-1
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord De Mauley

5: Clause 2, page 2, line 18, leave out “800” and insert “1000”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment would raise the minimum threshold for a premises to be an “enhanced duty premises” from 800 to 1000.

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2025
Reference
844 c159
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I prevail upon the patience of your Lordships, if I may, in speaking to my Amendments 5 and 5A. These seek to increase the threshold for enhanced duty premises for qualifying events from 800 people to 1,000 people. The matter of thresholds was discussed at some length in...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2025
Reference
844 cc159-163
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for what he said, but I respectfully point out that a threshold of 1,000 would catch events at the Wembley arena. His position on 800 will catch the event we discussed in Committee and that I talked to him about, which cannot possibly afford...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2025
Reference
844 c164
House
House of Lords

It is impossible to know the answer. I think the Minister knows that and I do. Let us not waste any more time. I beg leave to test the opinion of the House.

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2025
Reference
844 c164
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord De Mauley

13: After Clause 5, insert the following new Clause—

“Exemption from public protection procedures

(1) The person responsible for qualifying premises or events may apply to the Secretary of State, or the Security Industry Authority, for exemption from one or all of the public protection procedures.

(2) Exemption from the...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2025
Reference
844 c177
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to all noble Lords for their contributions. I am grateful to the Minister for his patience, but I go back to what I said earlier, which is to quote him, actually. He exhorted us to rely on the

“so far as is reasonably practicable”

wording. The problem with that...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2025
Reference
844 cc177-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 22 is in my name. I am sure we all recognise the threat that the Bill seeks to address and do not underestimate its importance. The attack on the Manchester Arena was, frankly, awful and we must do everything we can to prevent such things happening in...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2025
Reference
843 cc786-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will. Thirdly, as regards the requirement in Clause 6(3)(d) relating to security of information about the event that may assist in planning acts of terrorism, given that most large events are pre-advertised and many are pre-sold, how practical will this requirement be and how does the Minister...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 February 2025
Reference
843 c789
House
House of Lords

My Lords, despite supporting the Bill in general, I strongly support Amendment 11, which I will speak to. An assessment of risk, which is generally agreed to be appropriate in all aspects of modern life, seems to be absent from the Bill. Any premises or event, regardless of the real...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2025
Reference
843 cc529-530
House
House of Lords

So, is once a year “from time to time”?

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2025
Reference
843 c533
House
House of Lords

I understand the difficulty that the Minister is in, but the point I am trying to make is that it is important that those operating the premises know what they are required to do. Unless they know what “from time to time” means, it is very difficult for them to...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2025
Reference
843 c530
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at the risk of incurring the ire of the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, while we are on the subject of nickel-and-diming over numbers, how did the Minister settle on a figure of 800 attendees, above which an event becomes a qualifying event and compliance becomes significantly more expensive?...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2025
Reference
843 c542
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in respect of Amendment 14, which is in my name, I have to say that Schedule 2 is rather tortuous. Having considered it carefully, I am not sure that my amendment, combined with Amendment 19, achieves what I want it to in light of paragraph 3(5)(b) of Schedule...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2025
Reference
843 c574
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will also speak to Amendments 52, 54, 56, 57 and 58 in this group. Many antiques, regardless of the materials used in their construction, can be fragile and need to be handled with care. For example, ivory is sometimes incorporated into bronze sculptures. To the uninitiated, bronze...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 September 2018
Reference
792 cc2347-8
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what recent action they have taken to protect fisheries in United Kingdom waters; whether they are calling for an end to bottom-trawling and the practice of discards; and which countries' fleets are fishing in British territorial waters.[HL4066]

Asked by
Lord Eden of Winton (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 January 2014
Reference
HL4066; 750 cc258-9WA
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what are the duties of Ofwat with respect to (1) water industry consumers, and (2) the regulation of the financial health and structure of water companies with respect to their ability to finance enhancements to their infrastructure.[HL6506]

Asked by
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
744 cc392-3WA; HL6506
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this group of amendments is concerned with the information provided to consumers, so that they are able to make empowered choices and decisions. Amendment 104C seeks to add a new ‘have regard’ subsection to the list of matters that the FCA must consider in advancing its consumer protection...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 c262
House
House of Lords

That is right, my Lords. In fact, when we debated the previous group of amendments I spoke about the deliberations that the Department for Education is going through on that exact point, so I thank my noble friend for that.

The FCA will set the conduct-of-business regime within which firms will...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2012
Reference
739 cc262-3
House
House of Lords

Draft Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Carrying on Regulated Activities by Way of Business) (Amendment) Order 2011 (SI 2011/2304). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room. [Relevant document: 27th report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments]

Lead member
Lord De Mauley
Answering member
Lord Davies of Oldham
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
7 September 2011
Reference
730 c59-64GC
House
House of Lords