Skip to main content

1-20 of 46 results for subject:Incitement

Member X
John Denham

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Denham, John (46)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

While the guidance is important in terms of avoiding frivolous complaints and pointless investigations, the Minister does need to rely on it to support the Bill. Is it not the case that every single piece of legislation enacted by this Parliament to deal with issues relating to discrimination and incitement...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
31 January 2006
Reference
442 c204
House
House of Commons

I will not give way to the hon. Gentleman, because I hope that other Members may get in. We need not be in this situation. If Ministers had told the police in August when the ACPO press release arrived, ““We will give your ideas a fair hearing, but do the...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2005
Reference
439 c376
House
House of Commons

I said that it is my view. I believe that we would have been doing this with none of the controversy or damage. I hope that the lesson is learned. The energy that has been put into this parliamentary debate should be directed out there in communities winning hearts and...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2005
Reference
439 c376
House
House of Commons

: In many ways, this debate is very sad. This Bill will have a marginal effect on our overall security and the balance sheet is depressing. The truth is that the Prime Minister and Ministers have expended more effort on winning the votes of MPs than they have on winning...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2005
Reference
439 c375-6
House
House of Commons

I will not give way, as I want to make progress. If the Government and police between them could not produce a proper assessment, the House should do that in the months to come. I intend to consult members of my Select Committee on requesting that we should carry out...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2005
Reference
439 c376
House
House of Commons

I wholeheartedly welcome the commitment made by the Home Secretary today to refer the thorny issue of the definition of terrorism to Lord Carlile and to ask him to report to the House within a year. That issue has exercised many of us, and it is a very difficult one...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2005
Reference
439 c432
House
House of Commons

May I caution my right hon. Friend not to overstate his case? I do not question the integrity of the police in proposing 90 days, and they may well have a good case. However, according to documents released to the Home Affairs Committee, when the Government agreed to support the...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 November 2005
Reference
439 c339-40
House
House of Commons

: The Government might be storing up a problem. A number of Governments with whom we are generally friendly regard some of their own citizens as terrorists, while the British Government have taken a more ambiguous view. In the past, the British Government have said ““We cannot deal with these...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2005
Reference
438 c1042-3
House
House of Commons

Although such an attack is clearly terrorist and would be defined as such in the 2000 Act, the point is that we are considering new laws that we never thought it necessary to introduce when we faced the PIRA attacks. That is why we need to look at the definition...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2005
Reference
438 c1069
House
House of Commons

Does not my hon. Friend realise that the provision could cover people who had not taken part in any terrorist activity at all in the other country, but had glorified terrorism, which might not even have been an offence in that country? If such people came here as asylum seekers,...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2005
Reference
438 c1051
House
House of Commons

I will touch on that issue, which relates to the report from which I took the wording of my amendment, in a moment. That report was by the high-level working group established by the Secretary-General of the United Nations in preparation for the 60th anniversary world summit. The group addressed...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2005
Reference
438 c1064-5
House
House of Commons

I shall have to reflect on that, and perhaps we will be able to return to it when the Bill comes back on Report. I do not think that there are any circumstances in which deliberately targeting civilians or non-state combatants is a good idea, although it clearly happens. In...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2005
Reference
438 c1065
House
House of Commons

: What I shall say about my amendment, No. 69, will follow comments that have already been made and will, I hope, begin to show the possibility of a way of dealing with the problems that we confront—the type of civilian murder promoted by al-Qaeda, and also the type of...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2005
Reference
438 c1063
House
House of Commons

I apologise to my hon. Friend the Minister and the House for having joined the debate somewhat late. A moment ago, my hon. Friend said that the target of the measure was organisations that glorified terrorism, and he referred specifically to the causing of mass murder. Does he accept that...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2005
Reference
438 c992-3
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is possibly aware that I had been contemplating voting against the Government for only the second time in 13 years, so I am grateful for the indication that she is, if I understand her, willing to look again at the wording of the clause. That is...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2005
Reference
438 c875
House
House of Commons

: Throughout this debate we need to focus our minds on the problem that we are trying to solve; otherwise, we shall get into an abstract debate about the legislation. Despite the argument that some right hon. and hon. Members have made that there is no case for any change...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2005
Reference
438 c863-5
House
House of Commons

Is not the problem that, in the example given by my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Medway (Mr. Marshall-Andrews), if one deleted the words ““destruction of power lines””—or whatever—and inserted the words ““killing of civilians”” and ““oppressive regime””, the Government certainly intend to catch that under clause 1?...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2005
Reference
438 c841
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend recall the first President Bush, at the end of the first Gulf war, urging the Iraqi people to rise up and overthrow Saddam Hussein? Has he considered the possibility that had this Bill been in place at that time, the President would have been guilty of...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2005
Reference
438 c853
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. and learned Gentleman agree that one of the lessons of that period of history was that members of the public who supported those views were better drawn into the political process as voters who sought representation in a democracy than they were as active supporters of...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2005
Reference
438 c367
House
House of Commons

I certainly do not accept Hamas’s strategy of terrorism, or its vision of the destruction of Israel. However, we make a mistake if we believe that organisations such as Hamas are indistinguishable from organisations such as al-Qaeda. One of the problems with the Bill is that it condemns such organisations...

Member
John Denham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2005
Reference
438 c370-1
House
House of Commons