Skip to main content

1-20 of 45 results for subject:Dissolution

Member X
Thomas Docherty

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Docherty, Thomas (45)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Will the Minister give a guarantee that he will consult the First Minister and the Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland about this Committee and about the West Lothian commission?

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2011
Reference
532 c595
House
House of Commons

May I begin by asking the Minister to answer the third question I posed to him? In some ways, it is the most important—it is the question about the size of the proposed Committee. I have a huge amount of respect for the Minister and I think he secretly enjoys...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2011
Reference
532 c592
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister clarify three points? First, why has he chosen 1 June 2020 as the start date, rather than immediately after the general election on the first Thursday of May? Secondly, does he expect the whole process to take place between 1 June and 30 November 2020? Thirdly, why...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2011
Reference
532 c584
House
House of Commons

Coalition negotiations!

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2011
Reference
532 c584
House
House of Commons

I do not share the hon. Gentleman's optimism about the coalition holding together successfully for the full five years. I think that he is accepting that, in effect, we now have, permanently, a five-year Scottish Parliament and a five-year Welsh Assembly, but I am not sure whether legislation will be...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2011
Reference
532 c593-4
House
House of Commons

I have listened quite attentively to the hon. Gentleman's quite interesting opening remarks. Will he clarify something for me? If a party's manifesto—I appreciate that this is a bizarre concept for Liberal Democrats—contained a plan to reduce the length of a Parliament, should the House of Lords have the opportunity...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c708
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a perfectly sensible point, although I always caution hon. Members not to equate local elections in England to elections to the devolved Administrations. There is a substantive difference in the amount of spend that is allowed, and the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland devolved elections use...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c763
House
House of Commons

The Minister is a thoroughly reasonable individual and I am sure he will not hold that statement against the rest of Her Majesty's loyal Opposition when he considers accepting our amendments. As has been outlined previously—it would be inappropriate for me to go into great detail—we do not support the...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c762-3
House
House of Commons

I do not like to leave the House in suspense, but on this one occasion hon. Members will have to wait and see how many of our amendments the Government are prepared to accept. Clearly, if the Minister accepts all the considered amendments that we have offered, we would be...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c762
House
House of Commons

I shall keep my remarks brief as I understand that the Prime Minister might be rushing back to make a statement to the House about the commercialisation of Downing street following the revelations from the hon. Member for Grantham and Stamford (Nick Boles) earlier this evening. I understand that the...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c761-2
House
House of Commons

I am fascinated by the hon. Gentleman's logic, but does he accept that, with the exception of the Parliament between 1987 and 1992, every Parliament since the 1950s that has lasted longer than four years has ended with the defeat of the governing party at a general election? Frankly, if...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c757
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. My understanding of the procedures of the House is that Members need to refer directly to the proposals on the amendment paper, not rehash or rehearse a debate that took place previously, and at some length.

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c758
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a completely sensible point that goes to the heart of some of our arguments tonight. I will give a specific example, because there has been some discussion of the fact that none of those cases was the direct result of a no-confidence vote. I remind the...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c763-4
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman highlights a crucial element, and as my hon. Friend the Member for Foyle mentioned earlier—the hon. Gentleman will correct me if I am wrong—that was an Adjournment debate and was not even a formal resolution. That shows exactly the problem with the Bill as it is worded....

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c764-5
House
House of Commons

For the benefit of the Deputy Leader of the House and of the Official Report, my point was that my hon. Friend the Member for Rhondda (Chris Bryant) referred to the fact that up until the 19th edition of ““Erskine May”” the word ““shame”” was not allowed. My point was...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c765
House
House of Commons

I have listened attentively to the Minister's remarks. Notwithstanding his reluctance to support our reasoned amendment, will he outline where he has got to, therefore, in discussions with the devolved Administrations about how the elections will work, and outline when we will see proposed legislation? Clearly, there is a significant...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c768
House
House of Commons

I am sure that the fact that the Conservatives have had to resort to drink has nothing to do with last Thursday's result in the Oldham by-election.

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c739
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Deputy Speaker. The hon. Gentleman seems to be claiming that the Prime Minister is using Downing street for commercial purposes. Is it appropriate for the hon. Gentleman to make such a serious allegation against his own Prime Minister?

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c741
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c741
House
House of Commons

““Erskine May”” is quite clear about the fact that if Parliament is prorogued, all the Bills before the House fall. So it is not entirely accurate to say that there is no effect to proroguing Parliament.

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c744
House
House of Commons