Skip to main content

1-12 of 12 results for subject:Injunctions

Member X
Paul Farrelly

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Farrelly, Paul (12)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

(2) if he will (a) collate and (b) publish statistics on the numbers of injunctions issued in the High Court in the last five years where the claimants have been granted anonymity in the listed name of the case.

Asked by
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
498 c400W; 295034
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what information his Department holds on the number of non-reportable injunctive orders each judge of the High Court has issued in each of the last five years;

Asked by
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
498 c400W; 295031
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the Prime Minister's Answer of 14 October 2009, Official Report, column 204, what steps he plans to take to assess the implications of the injunction obtained in the High Court by Trafigura in the case listed as (1) RJW (2)...

Asked by
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2009
Reference
498 c422W; 294858
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what guidance the judiciary issues on the circumstances in which injunctive orders may be granted in such a way as to conceal the identity of the claimant; and if he will make a statement;

Asked by
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 October 2009
Reference
498 c332W; 295030
House
House of Commons

(2) what (a) guidance issued to the judiciary and (b) rules of procedure in operation to the courts govern the issuance of injunctive orders; and what provision is made in each case in respect of the qualified privilege to report parliamentary proceedings.

Asked by
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 October 2009
Reference
498 c332W; 295032
House
House of Commons

Clearly, from what has happened this week, it is not only Parliament that shares these concerns, but the Lord Chief Justice, the most senior judge in the land. Has the hon. Gentleman read his comments of yesterday—it is very rare that the Lord Chief Justice issues a press release—on super-injunctions?...

Member
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2009
Reference
497 c286WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Oxford, West and Abingdon (Dr. Harris) on securing this debate. To say that it is timely is an understatement. I also congratulate Mr. Speaker for strongly exercising his discretion in allowing this debate to go on in the face of objections by the now...

Member
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2009
Reference
497 c278WH
House
House of Commons

Strangely enough, I anticipated that question from the hon. Gentleman. As a former journalist, I would never reveal my sources. The issue has been alive on the internet for weeks for people to see, but not the British newspaper-reading or television-watching public. The Chairman of the Select Committee—I am glad...

Member
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 October 2009
Reference
497 c278-81WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of legislation to protect (a) whistleblowers and (b) press freedom following the injunctions obtained in the High Court by (i) Barclays and Freshfields solicitors on 19 March 2009 on the publication of internal...

Asked by
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 October 2009
Reference
497 c1234W; 293006
House
House of Commons

(2) what assessment he has made of the implications of the Court of Appeal judgment in May 2009 in the case of Michael Napier and Irwin Mitchell v. Pressdram Limited in respect of press freedom to report proceedings in court.

Asked by
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 October 2009
Reference
497 c1234W; 292409
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what mechanisms HM Courts Service uses to draw up rosters of duty judges for the purpose of considering time of the essence applications for the issuing of injunctions by the High Court.

Asked by
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 October 2009
Reference
497 c1234W; 293013
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice if he will (a) collect and (b) publish statistics on the number of non-reportable injunctions issued by the High Court in each of the last five years.

Asked by
Paul Farrelly (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2009
Reference
497 c1010W; 293012
House
House of Commons