Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:"Secure training centres"

Member X
Lord Garnier

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Garnier, Lord (10)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, praying that the Secure Training Centre (Amendment) Rules 2007 (S.I., 2007, No. 1709), dated 13th June 2007, a copy of which was laid before this House on 13th June, be annulled.

Primary sponsor
Sally Keeble (Labour)
Type
Fatal prayers
Date
18 June 2007
Reference
1714
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that the Government’s arguments stand at odds with our own experience? There have been a number of cases since 1998 where patients or patients’ families, or those supporting patients, have sued the NHS, in whichever guise it happens to be, in relation to the giving...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c670-1
House
House of Commons

I do not want to have an argument with the hon. Gentleman about the numbers. We are seeing self-inflicted deaths at the rate of more than six a month now. If one looks at the figures over the last 10 years, there was a dip in the early 2000s, but,...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c685-6
House
House of Commons

I suspect that it probably will. While I take on board the hon. Gentleman’s assertion that my argument is marginally off-beam, given that the Bill provides for a post-event criminal procedure, I suggest that the Bill could none the less provide a deterrent through an anticipatory effect. The Minister argued—it...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c686-8
House
House of Commons

I fully appreciate what the right hon. Member for Southampton, Itchen (Mr. Denham) has said about his motives for supporting the Government in resisting the Lords amendment. I also accept that politics is largely a game of compromise, and that the best is very often the enemy of the good....

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c683-5
House
House of Commons

Can the Minister tell the House why the argument that he is putting forward is not in conflict with his Government’s policy of introducing the Human Rights Act 1998?

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c663
House
House of Commons

If the Minister is right in his expectations, there probably will not be any prosecutions.

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c667
House
House of Commons

During the passage of the Human Rights Bill in this House—the Minister may well have taken part in those debates; I certainly did—it was pointed out to the Government that passing the Act would lead to foreseeable and obvious constitutional collision points between the courts and the Government. That is...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c663
House
House of Commons

Can I press the Minister further on that?

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2007
Reference
460 c663
House
House of Commons

Statement on details of the proposed secure training centres for young offenders. - Includes details of location. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 April 1994
Reference
241 c636-7W;241 c638-9W
House
House of Commons