Skip to main content

1-20 of 36 results for subject:Intimidation

Member X
Lord Garnier

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Garnier, Lord (36)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I intervene briefly because the noble Lords, Lord Anderson and Lord Clement-Jones, have set out with great clarity the thinking behind their two amendments, and I am very convinced by them. I am convinced by them particularly because this applies to without-suspicion seizure, which is, from my point...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2026
Reference
851 c1928
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I want to speak briefly to the amendment that my noble friend Lord Attlee spent about 15 seconds talking about; that is, his Amendment 414. At the outset of his remarks, I was worried that he might be positively going to support his own amendment, but he very...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 January 2026
Reference
851 c1948
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I fully understand the balance that there has to be between protecting British citizens under British law and the need for good diplomatic and trading relations with China. It is a difficult balance and sometimes it leads to uncomfortable conclusions. However, in the event that, as the noble...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 March 2025
Reference
844 c363
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by thanking the noble Lord, Lord Alton, for securing this debate and for all that he said in his opening remarks. His speech was a devastating analysis of the real world. If this Government and this House fail to pay attention to what he said, we...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2024
Reference
842 cc472-5
House
House of Lords

On a point of order, Sir Michael. We have less than a minute to deal with the rest of the business with which the Committee was tasked to deal. You will be invited to report that the House has considered the Bill in Committee, but clearly we will not have...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1376
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I apologise for getting ahead of myself and interrupting you earlier, but as you will know, paragraph 3 of the timetable motion states:"““On the conclusion of proceedings in Committee, the Chairman shall report the Bill to the House without putting any Question.””"...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1378
House
House of Commons

Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Bill. Allocation of time motion for proceedings on Bill. Agreed to on division (283 votes to 145). Second reading debate. Agreed to on question. House resolved itself into a Committee. Committee stage. Clauses 1-2, 4 and 8-14 agreed to. Clauses 3 and 5-7 agreed to as...

Lead member
Jack Straw
Answering member
Lord Herbert of South Downs
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HC)
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1286-378
House
House of Commons

I want to make it clear at the outset that the official Opposition do not accept the Government's timetable, although we accept the principle behind the need for the legislation. The Bill has not come up on us by surprise. The decision of the judicial Committee of the other place...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1290-1
House
House of Commons

I will if the hon. Gentleman will be very brief.

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1292
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is quite right; it only deals with the money. Since the 1979-80 Session, 60 Government Bills have gone through the Commons with all their stages being dealt with in one day. They were largely uncontroversial Bills, such as those to do with consular fees, friendly societies, the...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1291
House
House of Commons

Like the Minister, I am not a member of that secret society, the usual channels, so I have absolutely no knowledge of what has been going on behind the scenes. I can say, as she did, that there have been discussions between our party and the Government, and I dare...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1292
House
House of Commons

There we are—nor did the Government. Perhaps unwittingly, the hon. Gentleman has made my point about the lack of preparedness that the Government are guilty of. I shall stop there, because I know that others wish to speak and we need to get on with the Bill. I understand the...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1292
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman misunderstands. It is the Government's Bill. We did not see it until it was in its draft form last week.

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1292
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Member for Meirionnydd Nant Conwy (Mr. Llwyd) said at the outset of his remarks, this has been an informative debate, and we are the better for it. However, where there is broad agreement, there is a need for additional caution. It is in debates on Bills such...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1331-2
House
House of Commons

I support, to some extent, the arguments of my right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Sleaford and North Hykeham (Mr. Hogg), but I will concentrate mainly on the amendments tabled by Conservative Front Benchers. Amendment No. 21 essentially seeks to redesign subsection (3), which deals with condition A....

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1361-2
House
House of Commons

It has never stopped the right hon. Gentleman in the past.

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1349
House
House of Commons

I am fascinated by the Secretary of State's story. In the absence of a special counsel, I would accept the thrust of what the Secretary of State is saying, but as that would be the purpose of a special counsel he cannot dismiss my arguments—or rather those I borrowed—in relation...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1350
House
House of Commons

May I line myself up for an undergraduate bashing from the hon. Gentleman? I do not want to destroy his argument, but to follow on from what my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Torridge and West Devon (Mr. Cox) said about the words ““any reasonable fear””, is there...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1369
House
House of Commons

We need a clearer answer from the Minister in response to my right hon. and learned Friend's question. Judges frequently say out loud, ““I am satisfied to the criminal standard of proof,”” about this, that or the other during an interlocutory application. I know that the Solicitor-General is nodding her...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1372
House
House of Commons

Moving her head. I am reasonably sure—I am satisfied—that the Solicitor-General was moving her head. Often the question will be asked during the course of argument before a judge, ““What is the burden and what is the standard of proof?”” I appreciate that many cases are not necessarily decided on...

Member
Lord Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2008
Reference
478 c1372
House
House of Commons