Skip to main content

1-20 of 46 results for subject:"Child benefit"

Member X
Sheila Gilmore

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Gilmore, Sheila (46)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The policy on the higher tax rate is, in effect, an endorsement of tax avoidance, which worries me greatly. Some of us sat through the Finance Bill Committee and heard Government Back-Bench Members say how much they disapproved of tax avoidance, but throughout this episode we have heard people argue...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 cc679-680
House
House of Commons

Indeed, people who are working and who are, or were, paying tax stand to lose considerable amounts, particularly in the light of the way in which the tax credit system has been eroded as part of this process.

There are those who say—again, this is one of those things that keeps...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 cc680-1
House
House of Commons

That may well be the case.

What we need to do is to find ways to invest in our economy that will genuinely benefit not just those who are unemployed, but those who are under-employed. The Government like to suggest that the rate of growth in the private sector has increased...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c681
House
House of Commons

As I think the hon. Gentleman knows fairly well, the increase in inequality began far earlier than that. The point in the history of the post-war United Kingdom when the equality gap was narrowest was 1979, which, interestingly, marked the end of a 20-year period during which Labour Governments had...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 cc681-2
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c689
House
House of Commons

The problem with the hon. Gentleman’s argument is that, even if the tax threshold is raised towards the median income, as he suggested, unless the minimum wage is raised substantially, many people’s earnings will be so low that they will still live in great poverty. That was why benefits such...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c689
House
House of Commons

Generally, when changes are made and we want to assess their impact, we carry out properly independent research. On the changes to housing benefit, for example, the university of Sheffield has been commissioned to produce reports, but what research into our short experience of the 50p tax rate was carried...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c692
House
House of Commons

On Second Reading, we were given to understand that the fuel duty rise was essential to the Government’s proposals and a key piece of the jigsaw in resolving the deficit. For many weeks, that has been the clear message from the Government. I understand that Government Back Benchers were exhorted...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c636
House
House of Commons

I understand that it is in the region of £725 million. That is quite a large hole in what was presented in March—it seems a long time ago now—as a balanced Budget. That was one of the Chancellor’s key themes in his Budget speech. We now appear to be faced...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c637
House
House of Commons

It is clear from the pattern of fuel duty rises under the last Government that such things were never set in stone and were not intended to be so. One has to look at the situation with which one is faced.

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c637
House
House of Commons

We have very different views about how to stimulate and boost the economy. The Government have run demand into the ground, for example by raising VAT to 20%, which has had an effect on fuel. Ministers are reluctant to talk about that in any detail. It has to be remembered...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c637
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an important point. When the raw product goes up in price, the pump price goes up very quickly, but a downward turn seems to take a great deal longer to reach the consumer. We have made similar arguments about other energy price rises.

The hon. Member for...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 cc637-8
House
House of Commons

Indeed, and a lot of people would be glad to see the Government make U-turns in other areas, and in fact in their entire economic policy. It has been misguided, and the Opposition were clear from the start that it was the wrong way to reduce the deficit.

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c638
House
House of Commons

That is a very important point. We had a semi-answer from the Government saying that savings had been found, but they seem to be somewhat mysterious savings. We had not heard about them before, and we still do not really know where they have been found.

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c638
House
House of Commons

If the Economic Secretary is so clear that there is money to be used, I once again have to press her on some of the choices that the Government have chosen not to make. From what she has just said, it seems to me that there may be scope for...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c638
House
House of Commons

It could, and there could also have been significant investment in the building of affordable housing, which is dear to my heart. That would not just give people houses but create jobs and apprenticeships and boost the local economy. The Government could have done that if they had really wanted...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c639
House
House of Commons

National debt is sometimes essential. After all, I seem to recall that it was very much higher at the end of the second world war than it has been at any time since. There were reasons for that, and I believe we finished paying it down only a few years...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c639
House
House of Commons

I do not dissent from my hon. Friend’s view. The new President’s general intention is indeed to break away from the fixation with austerity measures. That is not the same as saying that we do not want to deal with the deficit. The question is how to do that successfully...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c639
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c639
House
House of Commons

I do not want to dissociate those things—they are linked in lots of ways. Initially, we were told that there were constraints on the Budget, including not postponing the increase in fuel duty. What happens in a few months’ time? The measure is a deferral—we are not forgetting about it...

Member
Sheila Gilmore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 July 2012
Reference
547 c640
House
House of Commons