Skip to main content

1-20 of 47 results for subject:"Data processing"

Member X
Matt Hancock

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Hancock, Matt (47)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

On the contrary: data protection laws are UK-wide, so it is appropriate that this should be done UK-wide.

The second area is services. For instance, if a new treatment is available to Scottish patients in Edinburgh, which has one of the finest hospitals in the country, and if on rare occasions...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 November 2021
Reference
704 c283
House
House of Commons
Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Government bills
Date
26 October 2018
Reference
Bill 279 2017-19
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman has made this point in these debates several times, and I want to reassure him on the Government’s precise position. I stated this in my remarks, not speaking from notes, but let me read to him what the Prime Minister said in her speech on Friday:

“we...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c103
House
House of Commons

I hate to take the wind out of the right hon. Gentleman’s sails, but it was unusual to receive that letter from techUK, because rarely as a Minister have I been lobbied so strongly in support of my own position.

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c103
House
House of Commons

Second reading. Agreed to on question. Programme motion on Committal to a Public Bill Committee, proceedings in Committee, on Report and up to and including Third reading, and other proceedings. Agreed to on question. Money resolution. Queen's recommendation signified. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Matt Hancock; Margot James
Answering member
Liam Byrne; Lord Watson of Wyre Forest
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Debates on bills
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 cc75-133
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

This House has a noble track record of working with rather than against technology. Whether it was the Electric Lighting Act 1882, which paved the way for electricity in the 19th century, or the Television Act 1954, which...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c75
House
House of Commons

I absolutely do, and the Bill does bring forward the right to the protection of personal data, as I will set out. It is incredibly important to ensure that such rights keep pace with the sort of modern technologies that the hon. Lady—she is extremely well informed on these topics—refers...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 cc75-6
House
House of Commons

Yes, of course. Everyone who is a British citizen will have the right to make sure that data about them is held fairly and accurately, and in alignment with rigorous principles. The hon. and learned Lady raises obliquely the point that the Bill contains important exemptions, including those to allow...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c76
House
House of Commons

Yes, of course. Exemptions from the GDPR are allowed so that necessary activities can be carried out, including that of making sure that a minority of individuals cannot abuse data protection law with the sole intent of undermining immigration controls. That is provided for in the necessary exemptions. I know...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c76
House
House of Commons

Of course, there are always legal opinions about everything, and our legal opinion is that that is consistent—that is the basis on which we are proceeding. As I am sure the vast majority of Members would agree, it is important that we control our borders.

The Bill provides new data rights,...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c76
House
House of Commons

Yes, I can.

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c77
House
House of Commons

Of course.

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c77
House
House of Commons

I will happily respond to both points. Under the Bill, data must be deleted unless there are legitimate grounds for retaining it. The details of what is meant by legitimate grounds will be set out in recitals and then guidance from the Information Commissioner. This is one area in which...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c77
House
House of Commons

I wholeheartedly agree with my hon. Friend about not limiting the rights of the free press. He might be aware of amendments that were made in the other place on exactly that issue and which are supported by a number of Members of this House, including, notably, some who are...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c77
House
House of Commons

I agree that this is a strong set of data protection standards. We intend to stay aligned with the EU standards, not least because they are extraterritorial, which means that anyone wanting to do any business or transactions with EU citizens would have to follow them anyway. There is therefore...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c77
House
House of Commons

I thought I had answered the question—the right hon. Member for East Ham (Stephen Timms) was nodding, so I thought I had at least had a crack at it. As the Prime Minister set out on Friday, and as we set out for the first time last August, we will...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c78
House
House of Commons

I have received representations not only from the National Association of Local Councils, but from the Suffolk Association of Local Councils and many of my own parish councils—including Moulton Parish Council—which do an admirable job in telling me about the pressures facing parish councils throughout the country. I pay tribute...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 cc78-9
House
House of Commons

I am glad that there is a telephone line. I am sure that the Information Commissioner will be watching the debate, and will hear the plea for clear guidance on how small organisations in particular should implement data protection standards, whether they are small councils or small businesses. However, the...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c79
House
House of Commons

The Bill does not change the freedom of information regime. However, it does establish a data protection regime relating to intelligence services and national security, about which I shall say more shortly, and which will no doubt be scrutinised by the House. The specific issue of the release of records...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c80
House
House of Commons

I do not wish to labour the point. I too was the Minister responsible for national security releases. All I can say is that that is not within the scope of the Bill, and I think the system works effectively.

As recommended by Dame Fiona Caldicott, the National Data Guardian for...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2018
Reference
637 c80
House
House of Commons