Skip to main content

1-20 of 46 results for subject:Monarchy

Member X
Evan Harris

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Harris, Evan (46)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am glad that the Leader of the House has urged people who care about whether our legislation is properly scrutinised to vote next Thursday for the amendment calling for the establishment of a House Business Committee, which would provide for such scrutiny. That, however, does not help us in...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Business questions
Date
25 February 2010
Reference
506 c461
House
House of Commons
The right hon. and learned Lady was right the second time. In March, the Lord Chancellor himself said that the sort of anti-Catholic and anti-woman provisions at the centre of our constitution have no place in a modern society, and that the Prime Minister was ready to consult Commonwealth Heads of Government. Will the right hon. and learned Lady suggest that he write to them, if he is too busy to consult, so that we can get on with this reform?
Asked by
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 2010
Reference
504 c807
House
House of Commons
Question 6, Mr. Speaker. ... What discussions he had at the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in November 2009 on the succession to the Crown of Catholics and women.
Asked by
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 2010
Reference
504 c807; 313307
House
House of Commons
In March, when the Lord Chancellor talked out my private Member's Bill to end the discrimination against Catholics in royal marriages and against women in the line of succession, he said that the Government recognised that this discrimination should end. Can the Prime Minister confirm that he is, as the Lord Chancellor said, ready to consult the relevant Commonwealth Heads of Government this week and that he is confident that we will then be able to sort this out, so that the all-party—
Asked by
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 November 2009
Reference
501 c532
House
House of Commons

That this House disagrees with the proposed removal of the public interest test for access through the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to information held by public authorities relating to the Royal Household's function and activities, and with the blanket ban on accessing Royal documents that would result; and instead...

Primary sponsor
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
18 November 2009
Reference
83
House
House of Commons

In fact, the extract from Professor Bogdanor's book that I read out implies that he wants that provision to be changed as well, but let me be clear: my Bill would not affect the requirement that the monarch should be not only a Protestant but in communion with the Church...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c559
House
House of Commons

Indeed, and he therefore has every right to talk it down, but I urge him to consider that the Church would grasp with both hands the opportunity afforded by the Bill to deal with what would happen if Prince William were to marry a Catholic, given the problems that that...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c592
House
House of Commons

I am an expert neither in bringing together the Churches nor in history, but I recognise the points that the hon. Gentleman makes. It is interesting to note that the Bill has brought together a coalition—I was going to say an unholy coalition, but that would be wrong. Some people,...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c557
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend did indeed propose that Bill in 1991, and part of it was implemented voluntarily. I do not seek to speak for the royal family, but I cannot see that the change would cause them a problem. They cannot opt to make the changes themselves, because it requires...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c557-8
House
House of Commons

I am glad that the hon. Gentleman mentions Kevin McNamara. I was going to come on to him next, but the hon. Gentleman has put it far better than I could. I had my disagreements with Kevin McNamara about discrimination in the school system against people who were not of...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c558-9
House
House of Commons

Of course I accept that. The hon. Member for Thurrock (Andrew Mackinlay) says that he supports the Bill. However, what is in the Bill is possible and practical, whereas it would be more difficult to go further. I wish him luck in the ballot next time.

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c560
House
House of Commons

I am asked to resist that suggestion. I do not want to get ahead of myself by thinking about the Committee: that is a distant dream at 10 o'clock in the morning on a Friday, discussing a private Member's Bill. I shall deal first with the discrimination against women. Princess...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c560-1
House
House of Commons

That may be so, but sometimes there is something wrong with being seen to be a Vatican stooge. That is the point. In correspondence, after I had announced the title of the Bill, I was surprised to find that, despite understanding the limits of the measure, a small number of...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c561-2
House
House of Commons

If the hon. Gentleman will forgive me, I will get in my quote from Kevin McNamara, who pre-empted me on the issue. He said, in debate on his ten-minute Bill, the Treason Felony, Act of Settlement and Parliamentary Oath Bill:""the Act of Settlement…is extremely offensive in that regard. It stipulates...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c562
House
House of Commons

That is a point well made. Of course, we are here primarily as parliamentarians, but those who wish to identify themselves with the religion have the ability to do that. If one considers the psephology, we see there is no sign, even in Scottish seats, that any preference is given...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c562-3
House
House of Commons

Another benefit of the Bill would be that Peter Phillips could marry someone with whom he fell in love without that person feeling that they needed to change their religion in order to retain his place in the succession. One wonders how many other people's private lives or religious allegiances...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c628
House
House of Commons

I think that the Secretary of State has indicated in those remarks that he has not read the Bill, because it is not about whether Catholics should be in the line of succession—it is about who can marry into the line of succession—and it leaves completely untouched the requirement that...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c626
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is very wise and therefore, although he may agree with everything that is written in the Daily Mail, he might not agree with everything that is spun out of Government. It is my view, though we have yet to hear from the Secretary of State, that the...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c613
House
House of Commons

Actually, off that point. I am loth to interrupt the Secretary of State, but his recalling of the long history of oppression of certain religious minorities, in this case Catholic, combined with the list of the discriminations that he—with the support of those on these Benches—has rightly got rid of,...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c624
House
House of Commons

Will the Secretary of State give way?

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 March 2009
Reference
490 c624
House
House of Commons