Skip to main content

1-20 of 67 results for subject:Vetting

Member X
John Hayes

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Hayes, John (67)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The right hon. Gentleman knows me well, and he knows of my disdain for Gladstone and my deep admiration for his rival Benjamin Disraeli, who in my judgment was the greatest ever Prime Minister by far.

The key thing about the ISC, on which I sit—I am grateful for the Minister’s...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 cc1203-4
House
House of Commons

I will take up the point that the right hon. Member for Islington South and Finsbury (Emily Thornberry) raised about mitigation later in the debate—should I catch your eye, Madam Deputy Speaker, which is not a given. Will the Minister address the issue of when the Metropolitan police asked for...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1207
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend’s point is about the relationship between this House and the Executive and, more than that, the relationship between Ministers and officials. It is time that this House asserted its authority in that respect, and the Humble Address does exactly that—it is an assertion of the House’s authority—and...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1211
House
House of Commons

On that particular point raised by my right hon. Friend the Member for New Forest East (Sir Julian Lewis), what is not clear, however, is the relationship between the due diligence process, particularly in relation to Epstein, and the vetting process. It is pretty hard to believe that the UK...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1212
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right that that was highlighted in the ISC’s statement on these matters, and that is an issue to which it may return. It is not for me to prejudge that, but it is a matter of considerable concern. It was raised during the period of the...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1216
House
House of Commons

It would be entirely inappropriate for me, or for any other member of the ISC, to say what we have received, which has now been sent to the police, but given that following an urgent question just before the recess I challenged the Chief Secretary on the issue of mitigations,...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1222
House
House of Commons

This House stands tall when those across it find common cause in speaking for the people. Our authority is derived from just that. There is immense wisdom present in the House today, and probably even greater wisdom that is not present, but that is not the essence of the root...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 cc1235-7
House
House of Commons

Indeed, you will chastise me if I do not stick to my chronology precisely, Madam Deputy Speaker.

As the Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, the right hon. Member for Islington South and Finsbury (Emily Thornberry) said, there is some confusion about the character of mitigation. We certainly know that nothing...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 cc1237-8
House
House of Commons

That is true. Indeed, that might have been reflected in some of the messages that I have suggested to the Department that it might, even at this late stage, make available to our Committee—perhaps that is the most sensible thing given the terms of the Humble Address—and subsequently, in a...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1238
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Lady will know furthermore that Ian Collard, through a letter sent on his behalf to the Foreign Office, told MPs that he had sent an email

“recording the fact of the decision (but not any of the underlying discussions or reasons for doing so) and mitigations”.

She is absolutely...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 cc1238-9
House
House of Commons

I would not recommend it.

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1239
House
House of Commons

I will say no more except this: Disraeli said that circumstances are beyond our control, but we all have control of our conduct. Of course it is true that the context in which the appointment of Peter Mandelson was made was beyond the control of the Chief Secretary to the...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1239
House
House of Commons

Following on from the point made by my right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Kenilworth and Southam (Sir Jeremy Wright), I would add, “or later”. He is right that the Government could have said, “This is too broad,” at the outset, but they were provoked—encouraged—to look at it...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1241
House
House of Commons

I do not think that anyone wants to publish that document. The point is that it was a document that could have been made available to the ISC not for publication, not for disclosure, but for scrutiny, because it might have informed our understanding of the whole process.

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1243
House
House of Commons

In those terms, at what point did the Metropolitan police ask for the vetting summary? Clearly it is now a known fact that there was an assumption that that vetting summary, but not the granular detail, was likely to be published, albeit in a redacted form, having been through the...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1259
House
House of Commons

When the Metropolitan police have concluded their investigation, all of that material will return to the ISC, and presumably the Government will then want to publish the information, albeit in an appropriate and redacted form.

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1262
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 June 2026
Reference
786 c1203
House
House of Commons

The Minister will be aware that on 21 April the ISC, on which I sit, made it clear that the

“Humble Address does not allow for documents to be withheld from Parliament, only for redactions to be made where the ISC has agreed to them.”

Last week, we were obliged to issue...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2026
Reference
786 c406
House
House of Commons

When I was privileged to serve as Security Minister, the Prime Minister was my shadow. As we dealt with matters of the most significant national security, he was straightforward with me, as I was with him, so I hope that he will answer this straightforward question. The Humble Address made...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2026
Reference
784 c45
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether people deemed to be from under-represented groups are subject to different vetting procedures as part of the hiring process for police officers in England.

Asked by
John Hayes (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 January 2026
Reference
104131
House
House of Commons