Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:Monarchy

Member X
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Hayter of Kentish Town, Baroness (13)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It would be useful to know how this actually relates to the wording of the amendment.

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c47
House
House of Lords

The speaker’s own background is exactly the one that he is now criticising others for. He also has forgotten the people that Boris Johnson put in. So could we just have a little humility?

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c47
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government when the Succession to the Crown Act 2013 will be brought into force.

Asked by
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 March 2015
Reference
HL5280
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is for exactly those reasons that the Opposition very much welcomed the Bill. If I understand it, it is only Australia for which we now wait. We just hope that before the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge get to Australia, it may have done the necessary. Although their first born is a son, were they to have a brace that come further, the order of succession may still be important for those subsequent children. Can the noble Lord perhaps use his good endeavours to see this speedily enacted?

Asked by
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c923
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is an interesting discussion but, as the House will know, the Bill has three purposes, all of which are about changing the succession to the Crown. One is to allow women to inherit if they are the eldest; the second is to allow people not to have...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2013
Reference
744 c271
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as we said in Committee, the Duchy is about property, business, title and, indeed, money. Although we agree that those are, as my noble friend said, important issues and we would undoubtedly welcome the end of the inequality—the mistreatment, we might say, of women—as regards the Duchy, they...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2013
Reference
744 c277
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join others in thanking the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Guildford for the clarity and fullness of his contribution, which was appreciated around the House.

The noble Lord, Lord Cormack, seemed to imply that allowing Catholic marriage would somehow endanger the Protestant succession. I think he is...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2013
Reference
744 c285
House
House of Lords

I will live up to what the noble Lord, Lord True, expects and disappoint him. Not everyone was here in Committee, when this was discussed at greater length and there was an amendment to reduce the number—I think to four, or even to zero—so it was not as clear-cut then...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2013
Reference
744 c297
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking the noble Lord, Lord Lang, for his historical insight. As a mere contemporary historian, I think more in months than decades. However, I note that in the period I have studied, families have become rather smaller; having two or four children seems to be...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2013
Reference
743 c1242
House
House of Lords

My Lords, given that we support the Bill, this amendment does sound rather like, “Please make me chaste, but not quite yet”. Some of us have waited, particularly for the first part of it, for many years and we certainly would not want to see any delay. Therefore, we hope...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2013
Reference
743 c1186
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the noble Lord, Lord Deben, says, the issue is a sensible one. I then break with the tradition of everyone else who has spoken by saying it may be a sensible issue, but the issue is about property, the ownership of an estate, about title—as reflected in...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2013
Reference
743 cc1193-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be brief. I am sure that the Minister will give good answers to the questions raised. Perhaps he may also, for my clarification, let us know about the implications for adoption in this. I am sure that it is in the noble and learned Lord’s briefing....

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 February 2013
Reference
743 c1216
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble and learned Lord the Minister for opening the debate in that way. He says that he looks forward to a learned debate. I fear that I will not be able to start at that level, but I hope that others will raise the level...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 February 2013
Reference
743 cc785-7
House
House of Lords