Skip to main content

1-13 of 13 results for subject:Injunctions

Member X
Paul Robert Holmes

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Holmes, Paul Robert (13)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Government are trying to introduce a complex and bureaucratic procedure to deal with the problem of wheel-clamping on private land, which is often carried out by cowboys who are effectively indulging in extortion. We made that point in Committee, and experienced a glorious defeat by one vote. It would...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 March 2010
Reference
507 c111
House
House of Commons

The amendments are variously technical, minor and consequential, and we support them. I add my thanks to everybody who has taken part in this process over the past year. The only group that we have forgotten is the humble parliamentary researchers, including mine who did all the work earlier in...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c417-8
House
House of Commons

Lords amendments 40, 41 and 42 are very welcome, because they remove the Government's attempt to give themselves a blank cheque to act on such a controversial issue, whereby in light of the European ruling on DNA, they would say, "We'll go away and come up with suggestions in private....

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c414-5
House
House of Commons

Although we welcome amendments 30 to 39 as a partial step forward in the right direction, we need to remember the background. The courts rejected the experiment in Birmingham on the grounds that other measures, such as ASBOs, could be used instead, and that there was not enough evidence from...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c409-10
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Member for Leicester, East (Keith Vaz), the Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee, observed that it was good to see constructive engagement between Government and Opposition. Over the past year I have probably seen more give and take, with the Government listening to suggestions and adopting them,...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c403-4
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman's comments bring me on to the point that I was about to make. I recommend that the Minister and his colleagues also look to take more proactive action. Let me give the example of something I witnessed when on patrol in Chesterfield with Derbyshire police this summer....

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c404-5
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Lady agree with my earlier comment that we need to hear from the Minister exactly how the Government envisage the consultation by those local authorities that do not adopt the legislation taking place? If that consultation consists of an advert in the local paper that nobody responds...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c394
House
House of Commons

As the Minister said, Lords amendments 6 to 10 improve the definition of how we establish that a sex worker has been coerced into that line of work. They use the words "exploitative conduct", which allow for a wider definition that includes things such as deception and threats—for example, the...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c391-3
House
House of Commons

I agree with the points that have just been made. These are very straightforward technical arrangements to facilitate co-operation between two forces working across force boundaries so that they can have a controller from one force area and a handler from another force area, if that is relevant to an...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
499 c389
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a powerful case about the lost opportunity for Back Benchers, members of Select Committees and so forth to contribute. However, that even applies to those of us who served on the Public Bill Committee and had fruitful discussions with the Minister. During the last week of...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1353
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Gentleman share my concern about the example I gave in Committee? Two boys had their DNA taken because they built a tree house in a cherry tree—many people probably built tree houses when they were young. Earlier, the right hon. Gentleman asked whether children's DNA would...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1369
House
House of Commons

Absolutely, but as the case was well made during the debate on the programme motion, I shall not go back over that ground. The injunctions on gang members were said by the Government to be very effective in Birmingham, but Nottingham county court and then the Court of Appeal ruled...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1393-4
House
House of Commons

As was said during the programme motion debate, this complex issue was introduced late in the Public Bill Committee—in the last week. That meant that we could not discuss it in full and prepare properly in Committee, and we have a derisory 30 minutes to discuss it now, so clearly...

Member
Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
492 c1392
House
House of Commons