Skip to main content

1-15 of 15 results for subject:Separation

Member X
Baroness Howarth of Breckland

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Howarth of Breckland, Baroness (15)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I join other noble Lords in congratulating the noble Lord, Lord Northbourne, not just on this debate but on how he badgers, cajoles and speaks out on behalf of parents and children. I have been at the other end of it too, even though I am a lowly...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 March 2007
Reference
690 c1825-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not speak about parenting plans, but I want to say a quick word about mediation, because it is a word that is banded out and has many meanings depending where you stand on the professional spectrum. There is a real misunderstanding about the role of mediation...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c871
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do indeed, as I know the noble Baroness too well to think otherwise. I was simply commenting on her being a children’s champion. Over the past few weeks, I have spoken to judges, magistrates and our own staff, who all consider that such an amendment would simply...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c841-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand absolutely the sentiments behind the amendment. I believe that all sides of the House have the interests of children securely at heart, I simply think that we come at the issue from different positions. I shall outline why I cannot support the amendment. First, let us...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c839-41
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree that many people find contact issue difficult. I believe that that is because we do not have the right kind of remedies to ensure that contact can be enforced. That is not the same as the initial contact orders being made with the paramountcy of the...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c864
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is no excuse for having that much.

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c871
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should probably have said all that I am going to say when I spoke about mediation. I have a great deal of sympathy with the noble Baroness’s amendment, but I have concerns that I need to express. I am speaking as a practitioner, rather than as the...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c878
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry if I gave that impression. There are many good mediators who work with that form of mediation and for some people it works. With families where there is drug or alcohol abuse or issues of aggression, that type of passive mediation is not always the...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c878-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was not going to speak to these amendments but, having been goaded by the noble Earl, Lord Howe, I need to say a couple of words. First, I admired, as I always admire, his carefully reasoned arguments. They are always carefully thought through and, I believe, very...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c859-60
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I admit to now being totally confused. I should be grateful for some clarification from the Minister about what the amendment intends. Clearly, parents should be given as much information about what happens in court and the possible outcomes. Indeed, there are real efforts to ensure that that...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c883
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at this late hour, I almost did not get up to speak. I simply want to say that it is an absolutely legitimate concern to ensure that we look at the cases on their needs, rather than on which way they come through the system. Although I am...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c932
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c932
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not want to repeat what the noble Baroness, Lady Pitkeathley, has said. I also have to ask for the leave of the House as deputy chair—I clearly have a vested interest. I begin by thanking the Government for the money that they have already put into...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c922-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that it would be very difficult to put the provision into operation, except to say that the child’s needs must be paramount again. It is the old argument. I do not see how you compensate in difficult situations between two adults without causing problems for the...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 November 2005
Reference
675 c918
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when working on the lines at Childline, I was always struck by the way children would defend and care about the most destructive and difficult parents imaginable. Faced with fathers or mothers who were alcoholic, drug users, abusive, violent or emotionally destructive, their primary concern was most frequently...

Member
Baroness Howarth of Breckland (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2005
Reference
673 c603-5
House
House of Lords