Skip to main content

1-10 of 10 results for subject:Iraq

Member X
Robert Key
Subject X
Nuclear weapons

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Key, Robert (10)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Nuclear weapons (10)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It is a particular pleasure to follow my hon. Friend the Member for Canterbury (Mr. Brazier), not just because he and I both have the privilege of representing very fine cathedral cities, but because he has unrivalled expertise and practical knowledge of our reserve forces. It was also a pleasure...

Member
Robert Key (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2009
Reference
490 c521-3
House
House of Commons

Yes, of course. I was extremely interested in that part of my hon. Friend's speech in which he talked about the importance of clearing and detecting mines around our shores. That issue deserves far more attention and research, and we must undertake, too, practical detection and destruction of those mines....

Member
Robert Key (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2009
Reference
490 c523-4
House
House of Commons

I fear that I am not in a position to be able to answer that. If I could change places with the Minister after the general election, doubtless I would find many Chinooks flying operationally. I saw, however, that real progress has been made on that programme, and there is...

Member
Robert Key (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2009
Reference
490 c524-5
House
House of Commons

Will my hon. Friend share his perspective on the problem that Macedonia's name holds for the Greeks, who hold the right to block any progress for that new democracy because of the disputed name?

Member
Robert Key (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2009
Reference
490 c529
House
House of Commons

I had better take note of that; I apologise to the House.

Member
Robert Key (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2009
Reference
490 c482
House
House of Commons

Has the Minister read today's National Audit Office report on the Red Dragon project, which tells us that it has cost the taxpayer £113 million—

Member
Robert Key (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2009
Reference
490 c482
House
House of Commons

The Prime Minister says that he wants a national debate about what sort of defence forces we should have. I welcome that. I suspect that the conclusion will be that we have no choice. Against the current position of overstretch and underfunding—in respect of people and procurement—we need to take...

Member
Robert Key (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c436-9
House
House of Commons

Not true.

Member
Robert Key (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 February 2007
Reference
456 c427
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the unanimous decision taken by the UN Security Council and applauds its determination to deal with Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction; expresses the hope that the regime in Baghdad will not obstruct the UN weapons inspectors in any form; notes that Resolution 1441 clearly states...

Primary sponsor
Marquess of Lothian (Conservative)
Type
Early day motions
Date
13 November 2002
Reference
67
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion for the adjournment on defence and the armed forces (first day). (Inc ref to HC 158, HC 452, HC 100, HC 629, HC 264, HC 732, HC 433, HC 930 and HC 347-I 1999/2000).

Lead member
Geoffrey Hoon
Answering member
Iain Duncan Smith
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
1 November 2000
Reference
355 c717-810
House
House of Commons