Skip to main content

1-20 of 4,087 results for dept:"Ministry of Defence"

Member X
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Lancaster of Kimbolton, Lord (4,087)

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton. I start by declaring an interest that, as of 15 June, I was appointed Assistant Chief of the Defence Staff, with responsibility for reserves and cadets. I am now the de facto most senior reservist in defence....

Member
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2026
Reference
858 cc51-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I also take this opportunity to welcome this provision. I just have one question, and I apologise in advance to the Minister that it is detailed, but I am attempting—dare I say—to help the Government. Since this Act became an Act, the Armed Forces Bill has been published,...

Member
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
853 c442GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interest as director of the Army Reserve. Successive Governments have rightly linked defence investment to economic growth. Of course, a key element of that is the export element. However, we have a history of procuring the exquisite, which naturally limits its exportability. I simply ask...

Member
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1733
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether the third updated submission by the BRIXMIS Association, which the Ministry of Defence acknowledged receipt of on 24 June, will be considered by the Independent Advisory Military Sub-Committee on 9 July.

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 July 2025
Reference
HL9173
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support this continuation order. I start by declaring my interests as a director of the Army Reserve and the chairman of the Reserve Forces review in 2030. I will ask a couple of questions but, in looking forward to next year’s Armed Forces Act, I also want...

Member
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 cc207-210GC
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to the Minister for giving way. I suppose I bring good news: I do not think we have a problem with recruitment. The one thing we do not have is a shortage of people wishing to join the Armed Forces. The problem we have is the...

Member
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2025
Reference
847 c214GC
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether withdrawing from the Ottawa Treaty would have any benefit in meeting recommendation 42 of the Strategic Defence Review 2025 "to increase lethality ten-fold".

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 July 2025
Reference
HL8845
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the announcement by Poland, Finland, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia that they intend to withdraw from the Ottawa Treaty banning anti-personnel mines; and whether they intend to consider withdrawal as well.

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 June 2025
Reference
HL8317
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government on which dates since 2016 the Advisory Military Sub Committee has met.

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 May 2025
Reference
HL7076
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether minutes of Advisory Military Sub-Committee meetings are kept.

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 May 2025
Reference
HL6890
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I oppose Amendments 1 and 6. While I have enormous sympathy with their intent, when I heard the noble Baroness say that this would expand the role of the commissioner a little bit, I am afraid I thought it would do anything but. If we consider that there...

Member
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 cc1248-9
House
House of Lords

It does, apart from the clarification of what defines a veteran, on the basis that when a regular member of the Armed Forces leaves, they still have a reserve liability. We like to call them veterans, but they become part of the regular reserve and, subsequently, the recall reserve, so...

Member
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 April 2025
Reference
845 c1250
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government under what circumstances they would reconsider the decision not to award a clasp to the General Service Medal for service in BRIXMIS.

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 April 2025
Reference
HL6253
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what definition they use for "family members" in the Armed Forces Commissioner Bill.

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
HL5555
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what conditions (1) regular members of the British Army, (2) members of the Army Reserve, (3) members of the Regular Reserve, (4) members of the recall reserve, and (5) civilians employed by the Ministry of Defence are subject to under service law; and what conditions...

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
HL5556
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the value of the Defence Gateway in enabling communication with and the work of the active and strategic reserve.

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
HL5512
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to extend or replace the contract for the Defence Gateway.

Asked by
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
HL5513
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with the greatest respect to the noble Baroness, I will speak against Amendment 2. I declare my interest as a member of the Army Board.

I understand the intent, but my objection to Amendment 2 is based on practicality. The recruitment process has changed dramatically in recent years. Indeed,...

Member
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 cc332-3GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness makes a reasonable point, which is why I said at the start of my remarks that I understood the intent behind what she is trying to achieve. Without getting distracted, the challenge that we face at the moment is a crisis not of recruitment but of conversion....

Member
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c333GC
House
House of Lords

I sense that we are in danger of confusing the recruitment process and recruits. The recruitment process is the process through which you apply to join the Armed Forces. That ends at the point of attestation, when you join the Armed Forces. You then become a recruit in training. It...

Member
Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 March 2025
Reference
844 c335GC
House
House of Lords