Skip to main content

1-18 of 18 results for subject:"Data processing"

Member X
Lord Lansley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Lansley, Lord (18)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Contrary to my intention, I must intervene to correct what I regard as a mischaracterisation of my views. It was not my view, and not the view I expressed, that courts have no role: I entirely accept the proposition at the heart of this that courts will make a determination...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 c1079
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad to have an opportunity to contribute to this important debate. I thank the noble Lords, Lord Collins of Highbury and Lord Alton of Liverpool, my noble friend Lord Blencathra and other noble Lords for bringing forward amendments. They give us an opportunity to consider some...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc1047-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad to follow the noble Lord, Lord Purvis of Tweed, who set out the arguments for Amendment 6 with his customary clarity and precision, for which the House will be most grateful. In large measure, I agree that we have managed to secure quite a degree...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 December 2020
Reference
808 cc980-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad to have this opportunity to say a few words about these two amendments. I can be a bit simpler than I had intended to be because my noble friend and the movers of the amendments say that these are probing amendments. To that extent, I...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2020
Reference
806 cc988-9
House
House of Lords

I am grateful. Just for the avoidance of doubt, will my noble friend the Minister agree that it is not without precedent for pre-appointment hearings to take place for appointments made by Ministers? I think that under the Cabinet Office guidance there are about 50 of such. I was not...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2020
Reference
806 c1076
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad to have this opportunity to move Amendment 64, the purpose of which is to seek from Ministers an annual report, starting after the end of 2021, showing what measures they have taken to exploit the benefits of the trade agreements into which the UK has...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2020
Reference
806 cc1015-7
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lansley

64: After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause—

“Trade promotion

The Secretary of State must lay a report before Parliament in relation to each year from 1 January 2021, prepared as soon as practicable after the end of that year, including—

(a) the measures adopted by the Secretary of State...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2020
Reference
806 cc1014-5
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the Minister for his response and to all those who took part in the debate. Everyone expressed their views in a positive way, and there was widespread support for the amendment’s objectives. I particularly thank my noble friend for his support for the objectives of...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2020
Reference
806 cc1024-5
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend for his response to the debate. I want to make one point. I fear that the noble Lord, Lord Purvis of Tweed, may not have understood my point about the unilateral scheme of preferences in developing countries. It was simply that, since Amendment...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2020
Reference
806 c997
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with Amendment 58 and I hope all noble Lords agree with it, because it is our shared intention. I am pretty sure that it is the intention of those negotiating on the part of the European Union that they will enter into an agreement that is...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2020
Reference
806 cc1005-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad to have the opportunity, in this group, to follow my noble friend Lady McIntosh. She will forgive me if I do not speak to her two amendments but instead confine myself to Amendment 93 in my name, which relates to free zones and free ports....

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2020
Reference
806 cc1047-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, at this late hour, I draw noble Lords’ attention to the debate on the predecessor Bill on 4 February 2019, in which I made similar points to those that are reflected in the three amendments in my name in this group. Regarding what the noble Baroness, Lady Kramer,...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2020
Reference
806 cc1071-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend will forgive me if I ask for a point of clarification. If Amendment 9 is passed, after the sunset clause is implemented, powers could only be made in relation to a healthcare agreement. However, Clause 3 says that a healthcare agreement can concern either healthcare...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2019
Reference
796 c948
House
House of Lords

Further to that point, I think following the list exactly may be the most difficult thing for the Government to do. Amendment 16 sets out to commit to a report on payments. We have healthcare agreements with, for example, Australia and New Zealand where no money changes hands. As I...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2019
Reference
796 cc960-1
House
House of Lords

The costs are exactly what the Government are proposing to report on. The Australian agreement, for example, does not involve payments to and fro. So costs do not arise. We have mutual, reciprocal agreements about treating each other’s citizens in our domestic healthcare system.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2019
Reference
796 c961
House
House of Lords

The Minister may wish to advise on this. I understand that we probably do not—because there is no requirement to recover the money—whereas, under an EU agreement, we collect the data because we are required to charge the Governments who are the competent authorities for those patients.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2019
Reference
796 c961
House
House of Lords

I am making a simpler point: it is no good asking for information that is not collected. There is a good reason why it is not collected. Although, this might happen in future, at the moment I do not think anybody is proposing to switch the Australian and New Zealand...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 March 2019
Reference
796 c961
House
House of Lords

In so far as the noble Baroness has referred to Amendment 43, which we might otherwise reach on Thursday, I completely understand the motivation, which we have seen elsewhere, to make no deal so intolerable a prospect that one does not want to enter into it—I do not want us...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 February 2019
Reference
795 c2252
House
House of Lords