Skip to main content

1-20 of 185 results for subject:Devolution

Member X
Lord Lansley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More
Lansley, Lord (185)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I have two amendments in this group: Amendments 65 and 73. Rather than the broader issues of funding, mine are much more nitty-gritty questions about the transparency of the business plan and how the funding processes for Great British Railways are to work.

Amendment 65 is to Schedule 2,...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c306GC
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for that correction. He has shared the email with me. I think it is worth putting on the record the point,

made in that email, that it is important to distinguish between joint ventures on the one hand and corporate activities of companies on the...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc306-7GC
House
House of Lords

I think that was an intervention. I can only speak for myself, but I do not think I am confused now. The Bill does not inhibit this from happening in future and that is a satisfactory position for us to have reached. That is relevant to this debate in that...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc307-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak on my two amendments in this group, Amendments 67 and 72. Amendment 67 is simply another opportunity, as there was in the last group, to explore and, I hope, again extract assurance from the Minister that the business plan and GBR’s statements in it will...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc318-320GC
House
House of Lords

I am not sure if that is a question to me, but let us assume it is. I am not sure that I am saying that. I am saying that, as things stand under this Bill, the Secretary of State is not providing money to GBR for the purpose of...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c320GC
House
House of Lords

I have a question pursuant to the debate about the powers to fund the GBR business plan. I understand from the Minister’s reply, and it is a reasonable proposition, that the Secretary of State should provide financial assistance in relation to activities set out by GBR in its business plan....

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c325GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lansley

59: Schedule 2, page 70, line 18, leave out “may” and insert “must”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment would require the Secretary of State’s statement of objectives to include objectives as to the standards to be achieved in relation to railway services.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c329GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have two amendments in this group. Amendment 59 looks at the statement of objectives that the Secretary of State sets out for GBR and what is intended to be achieved over the funding period. The objectives, as we can see in paragraph 2(2),

“may include objectives as to...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc329-330GC
House
House of Lords

May I just interrupt my noble friend? I think he has moved on to the next group. We are on the group led by Amendment 59, to which I just spoke.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c330GC
House
House of Lords

Forgive me for interrupting. I cannot find where it is required that there be an annual business plan. I can see there is a provision for the business plan to be kept up to date, but nothing that says this has to be done at any specific time or on...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c334GC
House
House of Lords

Surely there is, between the long-term rail strategy and the business plan, the statement of objectives. Surely the question, which I think my noble friend through his amendments has explored quite positively, is that the statement of objectives needs to be quite specific. Some of them need to be performance...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c334GC
House
House of Lords

Forgive me, but I do not see it as a conflict at all. I am expressing, as I think the Minister has done on a previous occasion, that there is a difference between what is long term and what needs to happen this year, next year and indeed, for the...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c335GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who took part in this interesting debate. To my mind, we established one or two rather important propositions.

The first is that, when the Government are setting out their statement of objectives, in relation to which GBR writes its business plan, it would be...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc339-340GC
House
House of Lords

I take that point, but, of course, that is if the financial assistance under this is restricted to infrastructure, which we debated a short while ago. If there is a requirement to notify of the financial assistance, I do not see it at the moment. The Minister might have a...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c340GC
House
House of Lords

I think it might fall to me to speak next, if my noble friend does not want to speak to his amendments at this stage.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c278GC
House
House of Lords

I have four amendments in this group: Amendments 26, 64, 304 and 333. They are all on the same point, which is that, in the Bill, the definition of a “relevant local government body” is expressed as mayoral combined authorities, mayoral combined county authorities and passenger transport executives. Those first...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c279GC
House
House of Lords

I have a quick question. Why, then, is there not a similar provision saying that the rail strategy may not make provision about the functions of Welsh Ministers?

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c284GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his response to my amendments. To avoid us further returning to this issue, I should say that there are other amendments to exactly the same purpose that I did not notice had not been grouped together, in Clauses 16 and 83 and elsewhere in the...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 cc286-7GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lansley

32: Clause 7, page 5, line 29, leave out from “section” to “in” in line 30

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment, and the amendment in the name of Lord Lansley to Clause 7, page 5, line 36, would remove the exclusion of issues including access to infrastructure, the infrastructure capacity...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c290GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are two sets of issues in this group. Mine is terribly simple and it is by way of a question to the Minister, just to be clear.

I do not understand why, in Clause 7, at the point the Secretary of State may give directions to Great British...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 September 2026
Reference
859 c290GC
House
House of Lords