Skip to main content

1-20 of 52 results for subject:Testing

Member X
Lord Lansley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Lansley, Lord (52)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I wanted to intervene just to say one or two words in support of my noble friend Lord Moylan’s amendment. In a sense, it challenges the Government to explain what they are trying to achieve, and if that is to regulate flavour descriptors, that is exactly what we should put...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2025
Reference
850 cc106-7GC
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister tell me exactly where in the Bill the power to regulate flavour descriptors is to be found?

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2025
Reference
850 c109GC
House
House of Lords

May I make a suggestion? It seems that we are trying to find out whether it is the Government’s intention to regulate flavours—that is, to determine which chemical additives can or cannot be added to vapes, which would end up determining what flavours are allowed—or whether it is the Government’s...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2025
Reference
850 c111GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lansley

154: After Clause 110, insert the following new Clause—

“Industry self-regulation

Insofar as the Secretary of State makes regulation under this Part relating to vaping products or nicotine products, they may have regard to the availability of relevant codes of practice, guidance or standards made by independent self-regulatory bodies which...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2025
Reference
850 c122GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in this group we are, in a way, returning to an issue that we discussed earlier in relation to my noble friend Lord Udny-Lister’s amendment on the nature of the regulatory regime and how it will be deployed. I freely admit that mine is by way of a...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2025
Reference
850 cc122-5GC
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Lansley

154A: After “Part” insert “or Part 6”

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2025
Reference
850 c125GC
House
House of Lords

I hope noble Lords will forgive me: I have tabled an amendment to my own amendment, just for the purpose of making it clear that it became apparent that, in relation to brand sharing, for example, it might be appropriate for this to apply in Part 6 as well as...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2025
Reference
850 c125GC
House
House of Lords

Before my noble friend moves on to that helpful analogy, I would like to say—not least in response to what the noble Baroness, Lady Northover, said—that I do not regard what I am putting forward as asking for industry self-regulation. In fact, I am asking for co-regulation in that relationship...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2025
Reference
850 c128GC
House
House of Lords

I will give the Minister a moment to drink a glass of water.

If I may presume to ask a pointed question, I am looking for Ministers not to say, “Well, you didn’t do it in the past, therefore you can’t be expected to do it in future”, but to have...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2025
Reference
850 cc131-2GC
House
House of Lords

If I may intervene, since this is Committee and we cannot interrupt each other on Report and have this conversation, the point I am making is very simple: the past is not a necessary guide to the future. The fact that the industry did not do something in the past...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2025
Reference
850 c132GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had plenty of opportunities to respond as we went along during the debate, so I simply take this opportunity to beg leave to withdraw Amendment 154A.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2025
Reference
850 c132GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am likewise very grateful to my noble friend the Minister for his very clear explanation of the purpose of these regulations. I wish to speak only to the first set, relating to blood safety and quality.

As the Minister quite rightly explained, the purpose of the regulations is...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 November 2020
Reference
807 cc229-231GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I draw attention to my interests in the register as chair of the Cambridgeshire Development Forum. I welcome this Bill; I also welcome my noble friend Lord Greenhalgh to his first legislative responsibilities—I hope he enjoys them.

I will talk about the element of Part 3 relating to planning—not...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 July 2020
Reference
804 cc947-8
House
House of Lords

No, it is next door.

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c83
House
House of Commons

I share my hon. Friend’s view that restoring public confidence—on the face of it, that is the Government’s intention—can now be done in Staffordshire only on the basis of an independent and public inquiry. We are committed to that. However, he must recall that the problems—the quality issues—at Stafford hospital...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c62
House
House of Commons

Happily, the Secretary of State is now present for the debate on Third Reading—[Interruption.]

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c124
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Notwithstanding the recent debates on tobacco, at the heart of the Bill was the intention that incorporating the NHS constitution and measures relating to quality and innovation in the Bill should drive forward an improvement in the quality of health care for the people of...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c125-6
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c51
House
House of Commons

The Minister will recall that the intervention by Monitor took place on the same day as the publication of the Healthcare Commission’s report on Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust. The same thing happened in relation to Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust. Given that the Secretary of State, not Monitor,...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2009
Reference
497 c51
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health when the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency first began investigating the withholding of data from clinical trials of paroxetine; when she expects the Criminal Investigation Unit to take a decision on whether to refer the case...

Asked by
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2007
Reference
118142; 459 c339W
House
House of Commons