Skip to main content

1-9 of 9 results for subject:Decriminalisation

Member X
Lord Lilley

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More
Lilley, Lord (9)

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Newport West (Paul Flynn), who for many years and with great consistency has pursued his campaign on this front and, sadly, has not yet achieved his objective.

Some years ago, members of the press asked Front Benchers from both parties whether...

Member
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 cc7-9WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has not stated a specific study, but certainly that was not the view in the Lancet review of cannabis. I find that there is a searching around for evidence. It is policy-based evidence—evidence that has been looked for to justify a policy, rather than being found and...

Member
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 c8WH
House
House of Commons

That is absolutely right. The product is most likely to be unhealthy if it is illegally obtained and probably impure—of course that is even more true of hard drugs—and likely therefore to cause side effects that are not necessarily caused directly by the cannabis itself. Obviously, it is usually used...

Member
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 c8WH
House
House of Commons

Yes, I think the hon. Gentleman puts the issue in perspective with that remark. There is evidence that cannabis may precipitate psychosis in those prone to it anyway, and they should certainly be discouraged from using it, as I would discourage everyone from using it, but it is better that...

Member
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 c10WH
House
House of Commons

I certainly agree that the medical arguments are overwhelming. I cannot think of any good reasons for not allowing the use of cannabis and its derivatives for medical purposes, although there clearly are arguments, which I do not find compelling, for prohibiting it generally.

The more I examine the arguments for...

Member
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 cc10-1WH
House
House of Commons

To make the right hon. Gentleman’s contribution into a genuine intervention—I had finished—I will say that there is quite an overlap between conservatism and liberalism, and if he would abandon the wrong bits and keep the right bits, he could join a larger party.

5.14 pm

Member
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 c11WH
House
House of Commons

We obviously listen with great respect to the hon. Lady because of her expertise, as we did to my hon. Friend the Member for Central Suffolk and North Ipswich (Dr Poulter), who has similar expertise. I just wonder whether the studies that she and he have mentioned consider the prevalence...

Member
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 c26WH
House
House of Commons

Surely the hon. Gentleman agrees that the one argument that those opposing our position have leant upon is the evidence of the Royal College of

Psychiatrists studies, but the very fact that studies can be carried out on people who use and do not use cannabis shows that the present...

Member
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 October 2015
Reference
600 c36WH
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on royal commission on drug abuse and cannabis use.
Asked by
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 July 2001
Reference
371 c16-7
House
House of Commons